Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6094 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I have a CobraL4v Driver and i really love how the ball comes off the clubface.......when i bought it, i had been using a stiff shaft for a while but i would occasionally lose it right (now im learning that it was most likely more swing problem than shaft problem then) and i was coming off of an injury that caused my swing speed to go down slightly so i hit the driver with the regular shaft (demo day) and thought it was the better choice so i got it.....overall ive hit it straight but ive never been able to hit a cut with it whatsoever.....and lately ive been having some weird shots that seem to not even come close to hitting the center of the clubface and will take a dead turn left after i hit it (by the way im right handed)......my swing speed is anywhere between upper 90's low 100's.......should i move up to stiff and if so what shaft? (also by the way the stock shaft is a diamana blue board)

in my bag
driver: r9 with Fujikura Motore 65g stiff shaft
3w-5w: Sz with stock shafts (aldila hm) stiff
irons(3-pw): s59 stiff
wedges: 52deg. rac satin vokey spin milled 56deg. putter: xg9ball: b330rx


Posted
The only way to really determine the appropriate shaft is through a swing frequency analysis. My initial thought is that your shaft is actually too stiff for your swing timing, which correlates to the shaft coming back to straight and square prior to impact. The result is a clubhead that is past square (more closed) at impact, making it extremely hard to deliver a fade. Of course this is purely speculation at this point. I cover this topic in some detail on my own blog if you're interested in reading more.
Driver - Kenneth Smith 460 Classic Grafalloy Blue
Woods - Kenneth Smith 3 & 5 Woods Grafalloy Blue
Irons - Kansas City KC-102 Musclebacks Harrison Professional Shafts
Wedges - Kansas City 56* & 60* KCM-Grinds Harrison Professional Shafts
Putter - Kansas City Prototype

Posted
The only way to really determine the appropriate shaft is through a swing frequency analysis. My initial thought is that your shaft is actually too stiff for your swing timing, which correlates to the shaft coming back to straight and square prior to impact. The result is a clubhead that is past square (more closed) at impact, making it extremely hard to deliver a fade. Of course this is purely speculation at this point. I cover this topic in some detail on my own blog if you're interested in reading more.

I am no expert, but based on what I've read, I believe your analysis is not correct. Here is my thinking:

Due to the flex and resulting lag, a softer shaft gives the club head more time to square up, or in some cases get a bit shut. I would recommend a stiffer shaft if he is experiencing hooks.
Bag: Flight SS
Driver: 10.5* r5 draw with Pro Launch blue 65 Stiff
Irons: CCi Forged 3i-pw
Wedges: 56* CG12 black pearl and 60* low bounce RTG 900
Putter: i-Series Anser 35"Ball: e5+Tee: Zero FrictionGlove: FootJoy WeatherSofRangefinder: MedalistShoes: Sp-6 II, Adidas 360Scores this year:92 91...

Posted
If the shaft is too soft, there would still be lag at impact, which would result in a consistent push or slice. But, since his issue is an ability to hit any cut at all, the shaft cannot be too soft.
Driver - Kenneth Smith 460 Classic Grafalloy Blue
Woods - Kenneth Smith 3 & 5 Woods Grafalloy Blue
Irons - Kansas City KC-102 Musclebacks Harrison Professional Shafts
Wedges - Kansas City 56* & 60* KCM-Grinds Harrison Professional Shafts
Putter - Kansas City Prototype

Posted
good move on the l4v, its a great club. I found in my tryouts with different shafts there wasnt a huge difference in workability with any given shaft, seeing as the club is designed to hit it long and straight. Ive got mine set up now to play a slight draw, but am still struggling to play a consistent high fade. You may want to look at your swing mechanics before you switch shafts.
If you do decide to go with a new shaft, I love mine (see sig), check it out.

In the Sasquatch Tour Stand Bag

L4V 9* Fujikura Rombax Z 6Z08
S9-1 Pro 15* Matrix OZIK X-Con
Baffler Pro 21* Golfsmith P2 irons - 4-PW True Temper Dynamic Gold X100 CG14 Chrome Wedges Dynamic Gold X100 52* 56* 60* Rossa Monza SpiderBall - TP Red


Posted
If the shaft is too soft, there would still be lag at impact, which would result in a consistent push or slice. But, since his issue is an ability to hit any cut at all, the shaft cannot be too soft.

From what i've read i thought that iWalk18 was correct: I thought that generally if the shaft is too soft the individual would experience hooks and if it is too stiff you would tend to lose the ball to the right... also, with a swing speed of high 90's-100's most manufacturers suggest a stiff shaft, yes i know it's more about tempo but i don't know of anyone with a ss of 100 or more with a reg flex shaft first thing I would do would be to switch to a stiff shaft or if you like the regular flex try hitting a shaft with a lower torque and see how your balls turn out...
Taylormade R9 TP 9.5*w/ Diamana Kai'li 70 S (SST PURE)
Callaway FT 3 Wood
Adams Pro Black Hybrid 20* w/ Voodoo NV8 S
MP-68 3-PW irons w/ KBS Tour X-flex (softstepped 1x)
Cleveland CG-12 52.10Cleveland CG-15 DSG 56.08 Vokey Limited Edition 60-V w/ KBS black nickel S-FlexCircle T Beached Center Shaft...

Posted
You're partially right, in that swing speed is not as important as swing timing. You have to understand that the amount of load placed on the shaft is not important, as it is only the time interval that makes the first basic frequency selection. A lot of club fitters never grasp this concept, but it is easily proved by placing a shaft in a frequency meter and deflecting it several different amounts. No matter how much you load the shaft, the meter will always present the same basic frequency. I call this the basic frequency because a correction has to be made to arrive at the final golf club fitting and shaft selection. So to take it one step further, the correction is based on the centrifugal force acting upon the clubhead. When a golf shaft is flexed during the downswing, the centrifugal force generated by clubhead speed is attempting to straighten the shaft, which reduces the amount of spring action required to bring it back to straight and square at impact. If there were no centrifugal force applied, then the basic natural frequency would be the answer. But, since clubhead speed is the precurson to centrifugal force, then the correct relationship can be derived as a function of clubhead speed, which would translate to reduced frequency (softer shaft) as clubhead speed increases. This basic understanding goes against the general shaft selection of the majority of the golf club industry. So, if two players have the exact same time interval between shaft release and ball impact, the one with the higher swing speed actually gets a softer shaft than the player with the lower swing speed. Why? Because the player with the higher swing speed is getting more help from centrifugal force, and requires less spring action to bring the shaft back to straight and square at impact. I once fit a long drive competitor who had a 130+ swing speed. By industry standards, everybody would agree that he should be playing the stiffest shaft as he could find. After conducting a swing frequency analysis on him, we learned that he had a very early release, and actually needed a very soft shaft. After putting him into the properly-tuned shaft, his accuracy improved, as did his carry.
Driver - Kenneth Smith 460 Classic Grafalloy Blue
Woods - Kenneth Smith 3 & 5 Woods Grafalloy Blue
Irons - Kansas City KC-102 Musclebacks Harrison Professional Shafts
Wedges - Kansas City 56* & 60* KCM-Grinds Harrison Professional Shafts
Putter - Kansas City Prototype

Posted
I agree with the idea that when you release the club really determines the shaft flex. I swing at 105 - 110 mph, but I release very late.... Sergio late. I need an x flex shaft to be able to control the ball. Now, the stiffness of the shaft will keep the ball a little lower, but I have a lot of control. My overall distance is great. I was fitted by a tour caliber club fitter, and was told I need a softer shaft with more loft to increase ball carry and over all distance. He made me a driver and I did carry the ball a bit farther, but I lost control and overall distance. Too much is placed on carry distance. The most important part is control. Never lose control over distance. Every shaft is different and every shaft will react different to your swing. It takes time and some experimentation to find the perfect shaft and flex for your swing.

My swing thoughts:

- Negative thinking hurts more than negative swinging.
- I let my swing balance me.
- Full extension back and through to the target. - I swing under not around my body. - My club must not twist in my swing. - Keep a soft left knee


Note: This thread is 6094 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦⬛🟧 ⬛🟧🟧⬛🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 Awesome, @WillieT! Go get another!
    • Wordle 1,631 2/6* ⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.