Jump to content
IGNORED

Who is better - Lefty or Tiger?


Rafcin
Note: This thread is 6495 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Right Now - who is better - Lefty or Tiger?

    • Tiger
      39
    • Phil
      6
    • Too close to call...
      2


Recommended Posts

If it was a match between them right now at this very moment, I believe it would be a battle of the mentally unfit.

I don't think it was the father issue, more of 2 months w/o competitive golf. One has to lose the touch, be just a split second off - and that's exactly what TW showed. His mental game is way too superior not to handle the situation...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
I'm a Phil fan, hands down. I like his creativity (although it gets him in trouble) and he always looks like he is having the time of his life. He is GREAT with the fans, a wizard w/ a wedge, a good family man, and all in all, I can't think of another player on tour that I enjoy watching as much a Phil.

Having said that, there is no doubt that Tiger is stronger (mentally and physically), more dedicated, and an all around better player. He does not really apeal to me as a fan, but I respect his work ethic.

Let's face it, Phil blew The Open, and he still looks shaken and off his game. Tiger, on the other hand, lost his FATHER (and also blew The Open) and he came back to finish tied for 2nd yesterday.

Phil, although I will be pulling for him in Liverpool, has a long and winding road ahead of him(had to get a Beatles line in there...Liverpool...never mind). Tiger, on the other hand, seems to be back.
In My Bags(s)... Main Set & Back Up Set

Driver: Rapture V2 9.o / G15 9.o (Stiff)
3 Wood: G15 15.5 / G10 15.o (Stiff)
5 Wood: G15 18.5 / G10 18.o (Stiff)Hybrid: G15 20.o / G10 21.o (Stiff)Irons & Wedges (4-L): Eye 2 +no+ / Eye 2 BeCu (Blue Dot / Stiff)Extra Wedge: 60.4 Satin Nickel Spin...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


why was this post even created... Tiger is the greatest of all time period....

Daniel Duarte
905R UST Proforce V2 76g 44" S
904F 15, Graphite Design YS6+
MD Hybrid, 19 Degree, UST V2 Hybrid S
Pro M Gunmetal 5-PW, Nippon 1150GH Pro SVokey Oil Can 52 - RAWVokey Spin Milled Oil Can 56, 60 - RAWTEI3 Newport II - Torch Copper- Prov1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Its an interesting post because soo many of you like phil, but I have to agree with DDBowdoin, pretty pointless although i have to say left has really improved these last 2 years but still tiger comes out way on top, hes been number one for ages and hes still only 30. based on form then phil comes out on top but tiger is still going to be the best in 5 years time maybe even 10!!! I wish i could say bubba watson is the best but i wil have to settle for tiger until bubba rules the game

Bubba Watson

In the Bag:

Driver: Titleist 910d3 9.5* Stiff Projext X-7A3 Rescue: Taylor Made Burner TP 20* X-stiff 3 Iron: Titleist AP2 Projext X Rifle Irons: Titleist 710mb NS PRO 105T Stiff Wedges Cleveland CG12 60* Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 56.07 Cleveland CG14 52* Putter: Titleist Scotty Cameron Studio 2.5 (2008) Ball: Titleist Pro-V1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


As much as I hate to say this I'd have to go with Tiger just because when you have to make par Tiger will do it. Phil just threw up all over himself at the thought of winning the US Open.

Both of their games are so different that I don't know which is better. Tigers is so tecnically sound, almost machine like. Whereas Phil's is so feel oriented. It's like comparing Picaso to Divinci.

What's in my bag
Driver: Taylor Made R7 425 9.5 degrees UST Proforce 65 shaft
3 Wood: Taylor Made V Steel 15 degrees
Taylor Made Rescue Dual 22 degrees (UST IROD shaft)
Irons: Mizuno MP-67 (bent 1 degree upright)Gap Wedge: Mizuno R Series Black Nickle 52 Sand Wedge: Mizuno R Series Black Nickle...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Number ! phil fan right here, and i have to break it down right now.
Right now-Phil
Overall- Tiger

As much as i love phil, and would love ot see him be #1, it would be completely abscentminded of me to overlook the accomplishments of tiger. what he has done in as little time he has done it is nothing short of amazing.

What I love about phil is his mentality. sure it kills you to watch him take out driver with a 1 stroke lead on the tightest fairway EVER, but it makes you feel like a million dollars when he pulls off shots even tiger couldnt imagine. it's his "go at it or don't play" ideals that make me push for him. its how i play, except i REALLY make it look bad haha. Not to mention i dont think there is a better short game out there, or a player with more creativity, than phil right now!

Im a lefty too, and thats reason enough for me to be a phil fan...

In My Bag:
Driver: Callaway Big Bertha Ti 454 9*
3 wood: Taylor Made 300 series
5 wood: Orlimar trimetal
Irons: Taylor Made 360 seriesWedges: Cleveland 56*, Tommy Armor 60*Putter: Carbite center shaft

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
...but it makes you feel like a million dollars when he pulls off shots even tiger couldnt imagine.

That's the thing, and something I said in the podcast: Tiger never puts himself in a position where he has to play some massively "creative" shot.

Personally, I'd put Tiger's creativity ahead of Phil's any day of the week. I think Tiger has more short-game touch, more control, and is a lot better at pulling off tough shots (even if it has a little to do with his better putting).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That's the thing, and something I said in the podcast: Tiger never puts himself in a position where he has to play some massively "creative" shot.

I've seen Tiger put himself in some pretty hairy situations before. However, most of those situations were during the first 5 or 6 years on the PGA Tour.

Personally, I'd put Tiger's creativity ahead of Phil's any day of the week. I think Tiger has more short-game touch, more control, and is a lot better at pulling off tough shots (even if it has a little to do with his better putting).

Tiger's creativity is twice as good as Phil's when it comes to 150 yards and out. Phil's creativity around the greens, however, are equal to Tiger from what I've seen over the past year or two. I can't honestly determine who is better with a wedge.

I guess I should have made that more clear. With a wedge in hand, Tiger and Phil are equal. When a putter in hand, I'd take Tiger all day, every day. 150 yards and out- Tiger With a wedge in hand- Both are equal Putting- Tiger In other words, the award goes to Tiger.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Being a leftie myself, I hate to watch Phil throw up on himself like he did at the Open. I swear, everyone talks about his creativity with a wedge in his hand, but when I see him pick up a wedge around the green, I know its because he didn't use his head and got into trouble AGAIN.

A friend of mine told me once he wished he had that low slider that I could hit. I had to have that shot because I missed so many fairways left. Phil has to have a short game because he just makes too many mistakes. You gotta love the guy for his "go for broke" attitude, but how many times is he gonna shoot himself in the foot before he develops a permanent limp?

On balance, Tiger's game both mentally and physically is better than Phil's.

****************************************
Roy McEvoy is my hero.

In My bag
TM Burner 9.5 S Flex

Wilson Invex Strong 3 and 5 wood

Maxfli Revolution 3-PW Irons

Cleveland 54/60 wedges

Odessey XG #7 Putter

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...

A perfect quote to end this thread:
"... The points separating Woods (No. 1) and Mickelson (No. 2) in the world ranking are equal to the points that separate Mickelson and Brett Rumford at No. 126...."
found it somewhere on the net over and out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

To put it in basketball terms (I know, analogy doesn't prove anything), Tiger = MJ. Phil = Reign Man, Barkley, Mail Man, etc. Some have won MVPs during MJ's era, enough to threaten and come close in the finals, but overall, no one could top MJ when he was at the top of his game. Wizards era excluded naturally.

I'm also excluding Bird, Isaiah, Magic, Kobe since their careers overlapped a little but not during the same time to make a real comparison.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


No doubt Tiger is the better player -- all the hooopla just a function of the Majors over the last year -- which, quite frankly, has been dominated by Phil.

I'd be curious who would have the highest number if you went back and added up their finishing place in the last 20 majors -- I bet it would be Phil -- but I doubt it means much, just that Phil has been more consistent in the majors and can't finish.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
No doubt Tiger is the better player -- all the hooopla just a function of the Majors over the last year -- which, quite frankly, has been dominated by Phil.

Errr, no:

Phil: 3 for the last 9 going into the U.S. Open (currently 3 for 11) Tiger: 2 for the last 5 going into the U.S. Open (currently 3 for 7) I'll take a 40% winning percentage and a 43% over 33% and 27% any day. Also remember that Tiger finished 1, T2, 1, T5 in the 2005 majors and, had he been able to putt, would have finished higher in the 2K6 Masters than his T4 (or whatever he was).
I'd be curious who would have the highest number if you went back and added up their finishing place in the last 20 majors -- I bet it would be Phil -- but I doubt it means much, just that Phil has been more consistent in the majors and can't finish.

Tiger would have more "1s" in those last 20, and that's about all that matters.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

By "last year" I meant last 4 majors -- I should have been more clear -- Phil 2 for 4, Tiger 1 for 4.....I guess it is all how you define the parameters.

You're right though, winning is all that matters -- Phil gets himself in position, but does not have the mental toughness to put them away like Tiger.

I am a big fan of both players and am least glad we are talking about how many majors Phil has won rather than if he will ever win one.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 6495 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Yea it is. A gave my brother a set of cobra irons at least a decade old and he walked away with 29 dollars worth of skin money the other day. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...