Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

What's harder to do?? A Hole in One or...


Note: This thread is 6220 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. What is harder to do?

    • Hitting a Hole in One on a Par 3
      43
    • Shooting a round of golf under par
      59


Recommended Posts

Posted
i think the question should be changed to which would you rather have...

I want both!!! :rubs hands together greedily:

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
That would mean that some 75% of all players will never shoot under par. Yet a fair number of those players will make at least one ace in their lives, and many will make more than one.

And this is based on what? Because of the stats that I have seen only about 20% of ALL players ever get a hole in one.

BTW - Had this question been, what requires less skill? I would have said hole-in-one. But if you asked the best players in the world what is easier getting a hole in one or shooting under par, they would laugh. IF geting a hole in one was easy, they would be as common as birdies. Just because anyone can theoretically do something doesn't necessarily make it "easy" to do. Easy suggests repeatable.

Posted
And this is based on what? Because of the stats that I have seen only about 20% of ALL players ever get a hole in one.

Geez, I thought this was over. What stats? You keep talking about numbers and statistics that you have, but they all seem to be pulled out of nowhere. As Erik previously pointed out... based on your simple equation for an average golfer being able to shoot under par (.5)^71 = 4.235164736271502e-22, I can assure you this is a much smaller number than a 1 in 15,000 chance of scoring a hole in one. IF this was actually a viable mathematical equation (which it is not for the simple fact that you cannot simplify the overwhelming amount of variables involved in playing golf, AND there is NO variable that can mathematically calculate luck), then "by the numbers" your stance would be in fact all but empirically disproven. And, by the way, if you asked a group of the best players in the world that question, I dare say that they would admit that for the majority of amateurs (and therefore the majority of players in the world), they have a better shot of a hole in one. Because they (the best players on the world) of all people know what it takes to do what they do and make it look so easy. The fact is, it is not.
Penta TP Ball || Nakashima Golf HTEC Tour Driver - w/ Mitsubishi Rayon Bassara 83g || Izett Golf 15* Deep Face 3-Wood - w/ Royal Precision Rifle Steel || MD 18* Hybrid - w/ Aerotech SteelFiber 110g || MP-58 3, 4 Irons... MP-60 5, 6 Irons... MP-32 7-PW - w/ Dynamic Gold || MP-T 53-08...

Posted
As Erik previously pointed out... based on your simple equation for an average golfer being able to shoot under par (.5)^71 = 4.235164736271502e-22, I can assure you this is a much smaller number than a 1 in 15,000 chance of scoring a hole in one.

Not that I care much anymore, but I said "lower" number, as in 1 is lower than 3, just like .000000001 is lower than .01. And no I did not make up the equation its basic probability, but I did make up the % of good shots vs. bad shots for a 20 handicap. I don't know if its 50% or 10% or 60%, but it doesn't matter much.

Its comical to me that people can't even understand when we are in agreement.

Posted
My head is spinning.

:slowly sneaks out of thread with mathematical stuff going on:

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Welp.... 'bout time for me to be hittin' the ol' dusty trail......

Penta TP Ball || Nakashima Golf HTEC Tour Driver - w/ Mitsubishi Rayon Bassara 83g || Izett Golf 15* Deep Face 3-Wood - w/ Royal Precision Rifle Steel || MD 18* Hybrid - w/ Aerotech SteelFiber 110g || MP-58 3, 4 Irons... MP-60 5, 6 Irons... MP-32 7-PW - w/ Dynamic Gold || MP-T 53-08...

Note: This thread is 6220 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Posted a couple swings here. I think my attempt to blend the movement still results in a more “around” back swing?
    • I never heard dislike for them.  From my perspective, they are just like any other club. Though, they were always probably over-priced, until recently as other club manufacturers have been raising prices the past 5+ years. You had to wait for them to go on sale, which you can get them closer to other club manufacturers.  They sell good clubs. Nothing crazy..
    • Why do so many people dislike PXG clubs and constantly criticize them? All the folks at my club and especially online, I never hear good things about them except from people who bought them and defend them. They look fine to me but curious is there some sort of quality issue or is it just stereotyping the buyers.
    • I have the LM1 launch monitor and I’ve been very impressed. I agree with your assessment and it’s very accurate for me and ease of use is wonderful. The price point of $199 is very hard to beat with this form factor and performance. I was previously using a PRGR.
    • Wordle 1,830 3/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟨⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.