Jump to content
IGNORED

Why when you see a 250-260yd drive, it's a bomb!


jcard71
Note: This thread is 5429 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I understand that no matter what club they use on those two holes, thats the yardage they use as the average. I was under the impression that he though EVERY drive on every hole was averaged.

I wouldn't say he's wrong. The PGA does only measure two holes per 18, but they only measure the distance. Mileydog's post was pointing out that those measurements aren't always for the players driver. A long hitter might hit his driver 300+ yards and could take 3 wood/Hybrid off the two holes they measure and average 275 yards in driving distance, but this wouldn't be an accurate estimate of how far they can actually hit their driver.

In my bag:

R9
Burner 3w
Burner 5w Burner Plus 4I-SW 60* LW, 52* GW Rossa Spider putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey man you're killing what ppl think of me on the course lol. I at least want ppl to

LOL,,,Sorry man, I didn't mean to pick on tall people :)

In My Bag:
Driver: :Cobra Amp Cell Pro 9.5*, Stock X-Flex

3 Wood: :Cobra Bio Cell 16*, Stock X-Flex

5 Wood: Cobra Bio Cell 20*, Stock S-Flex
Irons: Bridgestone J40-CB 3-PW, Project-X 6.0

Gap Wedge::Vokey: 52* CNC  

Sand Wedge: :Vokey: 58* CNC  

Putters: Scotty Cameron Newport II 

Ball: Bridgestone 330-S(2014)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Sorry dude, you ARE NOT AVERAGING 300-305YD drives, Tour Pros dont average that...You MADE MY POINT!

I'm sorry for bringing this thread back to life, but I played today after work. I met up with some co-workers when they were teeing off on #9, then played #10-13, skipped over and played #16-18 because it was getting dark, so in all I played 8 holes.

Anyway, I marked all my tee shots where I hit my driver just to see what my average distance was. Here's how it went: *9 -> 295 yds (rough and uphill) #10 -> 325 yds (downhill off tee but landing area is upslope so no roll) #11 -> 335 yds (drop-off at 315ish and rolled down it) #12 -> 298 yds (rough) #13 -> 290 yds (rough) #16 -> 306 yds (in fairway, flat and level) #17 -> par 3 so no drive #18 -> 295 yds (rough) The average comes out to 306.3 yards. This includes uphil and downhill shots as well as 'mishits' that weren't on target and/or hit flush. I know this is beating a dead horse, but oh well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


So what's your excuse for not being able to play under par with typically 100 or less yards to go?

Cobra GT stand bag
Cobra S9-1 F Speed
Ben Hogan Apex Edge 3-PW
Titleist Vokey Wedges 56, 60

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have caddied for five tour professionals in my life, as well as several high-level collegiate golfers. I also played Division 1 collegiate golf.

Every single competitive player in the field could drive it over 300 yards if they reached back for it. Every single one.

A really good swing with good mechanics can hit a ball about 300 yards without a huge, strong person behind it and most highly competitive golfers have developed those muscles quite a bit.

The longest tour pro I caddied for averaged almost 340. He reached two 600 yard par 5s with an iron and drove a 375 yard par 4. When he reached back and swing as hard as he could, and made solid contact, he was putting it out about 360-370.

But on tour, his driving average was stated (according to the PGA tour website) was 307.1. That put him near the very top of the tour, but the point is... his average drive... when he reaches back and DRIVES the ball, is about 340, but his actual stat was less because he frequently played 5-wood off the tee, about 285 yards or so. His name was James H. McLean if you want to look him up. I don't think he is currently playing though he did 5-6 years on the Nationwide Tour and a few years part time on the PGA tour.

Cory Pavin, regarded as one of the shortest hitters in competitive golf for years (official average of about 260) and says he can reach the green at the 12th at St Andrews with even a moderate tailwind if he reaches back and swings at it. That hole is 320-some yards in competition, if I'm not mistaken.

Anyway. The point is that most amateurs reach back and try to pound every drive. They also tend to only report those with pretty solid contact when counting their "average".

The tour pro often hits shorter clubs and frequently lays off his swing to 80% in order to hit more fairways and work the ball.

Although I agree some people exagerate, I think it's not absurd for an amateur to average close to 300.

I personally average about 270 at sea level, but that's a nice smooth swing, not a rip. When I'm swinging really well, it's probably 10-15 more. I rarely reach back for everything though. I have hit 380+ and can hit 300+ on command if I reach back, swing hard and make good contact. I rarely reach back to hit like that unless my swing is really on, because I'm liable to miss the fairway and I'd rather hit the short stuff at 270 than be in the trees at 310. Of course, I have been as low as a +3.5 handicap, so I may be an exception.

Driver: 905S 8* - Graffaloy Blue 65S Shaft (tipped 1" Short)
Fairway: 960F (15*, 19*)
Irons: T-Zoid Pro 4-PW w/ True Temper Steel
Wedges: MP-R Black 52*, 56*
Lob: 60* CG-10 (nice and rusty)Putter: OZ Putter (with oversized Winn Blue Grip)Ball:: One Tour

Link to comment
Share on other sites


So what's your excuse for not being able to play under par with typically 100 or less yards to go?

Both of my home courses are very penalizing if you are not in the fairway. At Hardscrabble, it's because you have to be very accurate off the tee to have the proper angle to hit at its small greens. At Champions, there really isn't any rough; your either in the fairway or in the pine trees with nothing really in between. Basically what I'm trying to say is that it's when I miss the fairway that causes bogeys on my scorecard.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5429 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Not sure if this is best to post here or start a new thread but I'm curious which stats you pay most attention to/how you utilize Shot Scope's data/charts to drive your improvement/practice?   I have 81 holes in Shot Scope now so starting to get a decent sample size of data about my game. I can obviously see the strokes gained numbers but I'm not quite sure where to go from there in terms of how to assess what specifically I need to work on.  Obviously it's approaches and short game for me, but when I go into those tabs on the left for those specific areas, I'm not quite sure how to use the information to make it actionable in my practice.   
    • I guess we’re kind of getting into semantics here, but you state “trading a bunker lie for a grass lie”. I would argue that a bunker under water is no longer a bunker. It is basically a small pond where there isn’t supposed to be one. The course has an unplayable condition due to weather and poor maintenance. Hitting a ball out of three inches of water is not a realistic option any more than hitting through a temporary grandstand is. Just my opinion.
    • So here’s the thing, you’ve treated the bunker as if it were GUR, which would actually be the appropriate course of action except you and your playing partners are not authorized to determine that for yourselves. The Committee in this case would be the golf course and in an ideal world, they would have handled their responsibilities and told you at the beginning of the round that X bunkers are under water, treat them as GUR. I’m actually ok with how you handled the situation in a casual round TBH but this is the rules forum and you asked about a rules clarification so there’s a specific procedure for that. As for your proposed rule, I don’t agree with the logic at all for the reason I outlined in my previous post. You are trading a bunker lie for a lie in grass for no penalty. And also, there are already rules in place that address the exact situation you found yourself in, including relief options for if the bunker was appropriately marked as GUR or not.
    • Someone asked would pros accept someone else keeping score. It’s done in every other sport. That’s what scorekeepers are for. It’s an antiquated rule. It’s fine for non-professionals.  I feel like there is a lot of resistance to rule in golf, as if these rules were brought down on stone tablets by Moses.
    • Y'all can appoint a few good men from your own league that have proper understanding of the rules or at least access the USGA rules (book, online, etc.) when necessary. They don't have to have some kind of official certification or blessings from any outside org/entity to my knowledge.  Yes, y'all could have collectively declared it GUR under F-16 as @DaveP043 posted as the self appointed committee and you would have been fine to drop outside of this particular bunker. Remember to not declare all bunkers as GUR on a wholesale basis. It is case by case only.  Now you might say 'who's got time for all that' (going around which bunkers should be declared GUR) then I can somewhat understand  your pain but at the same time you cannot fault the tedium of rules  enforcement as a general reason to declare them 'lacking in common sense'.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...