Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6004 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
In my Xtreme Sport II bag:
Driver: Dymo2 11.5*
3-Wood: Dymo2 15*
Hybrid: (4) 23*
Irons: Sumo 4-SW
Wedges: CG14 60* LW
Putter: 34" White Hot XG Sabretooth

Am I missing any clubs from my bag?

More specifically do I need to add a 5-Wood?

Or is it OK, to have the 3-Wood and 4-Hybrid arrangement?

Thanks in advance for the feedback!

Posted
Is your handicap really 30? If so you might want to if you have the cash. I have a 3 wood 15* and hybrid 19* then I go to the 3 iron. All Depends on your game. I have less clubs in my bag now than I ever had and my scores keep getting lower.
What's in the Bag

Driver: Burner 09 9.5* S-Flex
3 Wood: Burner 09 15* S-Flex
Hybrid: r7 Rescue 19* R-FlexDriving Iron: 12*Irons PW-3: Ping Zing 2 SW: Pro Series X-14 56*Putter: G5i ALLY 35"Ball: Tour Fire

Posted
In my Xtreme Sport II bag:

Yes, your bag is complete. You have the max amount of clubs.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2


Posted
Also were you branded by Nike because of a sales person or because thats what you like. Cleveland branded me about 4 years ago and I thought I was doing the right thing by changing all my stuff to the full set from irons to drivers and even putter and it ruined my game.
What's in the Bag

Driver: Burner 09 9.5* S-Flex
3 Wood: Burner 09 15* S-Flex
Hybrid: r7 Rescue 19* R-FlexDriving Iron: 12*Irons PW-3: Ping Zing 2 SW: Pro Series X-14 56*Putter: G5i ALLY 35"Ball: Tour Fire

Posted
Yes, your bag is complete. You have the max amount of clubs.

Thats if you play in a serious league. I play by the book all the way but alot of people that arent that great dont really care.

What's in the Bag

Driver: Burner 09 9.5* S-Flex
3 Wood: Burner 09 15* S-Flex
Hybrid: r7 Rescue 19* R-FlexDriving Iron: 12*Irons PW-3: Ping Zing 2 SW: Pro Series X-14 56*Putter: G5i ALLY 35"Ball: Tour Fire

Posted
Yep, handicap is really 30.

Suppose I've made a pretty big investment considering my relatively poor handicap - although combined will all the time I've been putting in at the range and professional instruction these will surely see my handicap reduce.

I bought these clubs after having a demo day and fitting session: tried out various brands inc. Callway, TaylorMade, Cobra, Ping etc...and really enjoyed the Sumo irons and Dymo2 woods. So I wouldn't say I've been "branded". To be honest I was initially quite reluctant to even try out Nike, I never saw them in the same regard as companies such as Callaway, TaylorMade and Ping etc...what can I say, I just hit straighter and longer with these clubs!

Just wanted to know when a 5-wood is better to use than a 4-hybrid. I left it out because I felt that in that range, the accuracy of the hybrid is better than the additional yards I may get out of a 5-wood.

Also I've heard that sometimes a 4-iron is better than a 4-hybrid. Is this true, and if so in what situations?

Posted
The gap between your 3w and the hybrid might be a bit much, considering you have a 4 iron AND a 4H. Maybe you could replace the Hybrid with a 20* instead of adding a 5w??

I don't know though, making a change just based on lofts is not always the wise option. My setup is unconventional but fits my game, so I would recommend you go with what fits yours, regardless of the numbers on the clubs.

Posted
take out 4 iron and put in the 5 wood
DriverMonster Hi-Bore XLS/w Mintsubishi Diamana Fit-On M Gold Stiff 55g
Woods906F4 3 Wood/w Aldila VS Proto Fairway Stiff 80g
Hybrid3dx red 20 and 23 degree
Irons3dx red 5-pw
Wedgesharmonized sand wedge 56 degree loft and harmonize lob wedge 60 degree loftPutterWhite Hot XG SabertoothBallNoddle or ...

Posted
Why do you have a 4-hybrid and a 4-iron? Do you hit your 4-iron well? If so, I would recommend using your 4-iron, tossing the 4-hybrid and getting a 3-hybrid.
In my blue & white Omega V Bag:

Irons - MX-200 Irons
Wedges - CG15 56˚ & 60˚
Hybrid - Burner 33 Metal - Tour Burner 15˚Driver - R9 460 10.5˚Putter - White Hot XG 2-Ball SRTBall - Pro V1

Posted
Thats if you play in a serious league. I play by the book all the way but alot of people that arent that great dont really care.

It's simply cheating if you are going to carry more than 14 clubs in your bag - it's LAME. I don't care if you are playing in a serious tournament, league, or just for a score for your handicap. It's stupid, follow the rules at least A LITTLE. I can only imagine how you are following the rules on the golf course if you can't even keep the clubs to the 14 club limit.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2


Posted
Why do you have a 4-hybrid and a 4-iron? Do you hit your 4-iron well? If so, I would recommend using your 4-iron, tossing the 4-hybrid and getting a 3-hybrid.

I was thinking of getting the 3-Hybrid, it would certainly have filled in the gap better between the 3-Wood.

But I prefer the loft and ease of use of the 4-Hybrid. I can't hit the 4-iron anywhere near as well as I can hit the 4-Hybrid. Think I'm going to just toss the 4-iron.

Posted
I would add a 3 hybrid and 5 wood and get rid of the 4 iron, that would give you 14 clubs as you have 13 now.

In my bag
Driver-top flite cannon 460 cc 10.5 deg, reg flex
3 Wood-ACUITY GOLF RCX 14°
3h-warrior golf tcp 20°
4h-warrior golf tcp 23°5h-warrior golf tcp 26° 6-pw-AFFINITY / ORLIMAR HT2 SERIES irons steel shafts regular flex56° sw-tour seriesram puttergolf balls-intech beta ti


Posted
I'm in a similar situation to yourself (skill level, existing clubs etc) and have considered a few different options...

In the end I tossed the 4 iron and put in a 3 hybrid...

I'd also look at the other end of the bad and consider a 56 degree wedge assuming the sand wedge is only 52 or so...

"Let the bears pay the bear tax I pay the Homer tax!"


Note: This thread is 6004 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.