Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6003 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I play the Adams Speedline "hybrid-fairway" 3 wood. Pretty darn easy to hit off the turf, though I generally only need to use it off the tee, if I need to ensure that my drive doesn't go too long.

Gary

Nakashima HTEC 460 9.5, 65g Fujikura Motore F1 (s)
Speedline 3W, 70-gram Grafalloy Prolaunch Axis
SQ 2 18 Deg. Hybrid, stock stiff graphite
R7 irons, 4-LW, stock stiff steel
White Steel 2-Ball SRT PutterSunMountain MPB bagIGolf Neo


Posted
No matter what you read here, Fairway Woods will always hit the ball higher than a hybrid. Just look at the club design. They are longer face to tail therefore getting more weight lower which does what? Right, launch higher. Hybrids should be considered for giving you a bit easier time out of the rough. Yeah, you can use it for those longer distances instead of a FW but it will definitely not get as high. There are a couple hybrid clubs supposed to be more comparable to fw's like Adams has, but most of them are targeted at iron replacements.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I do (in a way) I carry a 13.5 3wood, but i almost never use it from the deck. I carry a 17 degree hybid that i use for any shot from 220 to 230+ (depeding on wind) Ive used my 3wood from the deck less than 5 times all season. Its more or less a second driver for me. I dont play courses that are long enough to where i need to hit a shot 240 or more yards.
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted
I hit a hybrid instead of a 2-iron or 5-wood.

Same. I still carry a 3w and get good distance out of it. I opted for the 2i/5w vs a straight 5w on hitability. The mis-hits with the hybrid are much better for me.

I've spent most of my life golfing - the rest I've just wasted.

In my bag todayâ¦.
Driver: 2009 S9-1 10.5
19d Hybrid4-SW:2008 FP 58/10 Mizuno MP T-10Putter: White Hot XG Sabertooth

Posted
I carry both a 3W and a 3 iron Hybrid with 20º loft. i prefer to hit my 3H because its more consistant, for me anyways. i'd rather give up a little distance to be on the fairway or green for my next shot vs the rought and closer.

NBC Tour Member

In my Nike bag:
Cobra Speed LD OS Driver
Nike Ignite 3H Nike Ignite irons 4 - PWCheap no name LW (60*) and AW (54*)Nike OZ #3 PutterPro V1x or Noodle+ BallsFootJoy ShoesNike glove


Posted
I carry all hybrids (as noted below). I had some old Cleveland QuadPro fw's that I hit fairly well but since going to the hybrids both my distance and direction have been much more consistent.

BO THE GOLFER

In my Top Flite stand bag:

Driver-Ping G400+ 10.5 degrees regular flex Hybrids-Ping I25 17 & 20 degrees stiff flex Irons-Ping I3 O-size 4 through lob wedge regular flex Putter-Nike Oz 6


Posted
I carry a 3 wood but really only use if off the tee. Have hit it out of the fairway probably 2 times this year.....max. If I'm 200+ out I prefer to hit my 17° hybrid. 180-200 out is my 21° hybrid. I don't carry a 5 wood.

Posted
No matter what you read here, Fairway Woods will always hit the ball higher than a hybrid. Just look at the club design. They are longer face to tail therefore getting more weight lower which does what? Right, launch higher. Hybrids should be considered for giving you a bit easier time out of the rough. Yeah, you can use it for those longer distances instead of a FW but it will definitely not get as high. There are a couple hybrid clubs supposed to be more comparable to fw's like Adams has, but most of them are targeted at iron replacements.

Thats interesting that you say that because my fw goes pretty low. anyway, I am just looking for a easier to hit club to replace my 3 wood. If I replaced my 15 degree 3 wood to a 15 degree hybrid, do you think they will go about the same distance?

In my Bag-

Driver: 909 d3 Matrix Ozik XCON 6 stiff
3 wood: 906 f4 Graphite Design YS-6+
Irons: r7 tp Dynamic Gold S300Wedges: vokey spin milled Putter: tei3 newport 2


Posted
No matter what you read here, Fairway Woods will always hit the ball higher than a hybrid. Just look at the club design. They are longer face to tail therefore getting more weight lower which does what? Right, launch higher. Hybrids should be considered for giving you a bit easier time out of the rough. Yeah, you can use it for those longer distances instead of a FW but it will definitely not get as high. There are a couple hybrid clubs supposed to be more comparable to fw's like Adams has, but most of them are targeted at iron replacements.

If I have a perfect lie im going with the FW, if the grass is a tad tall or kinda in the rough going with the hybrid. Though i can see why some are ditching the FW because i can hit my 3hybrid almost as far as the 5w

Posted
I volunteered at the U.S. Women's Amateur last week, working the morning the second-round match play began.

At least a third of the women had a long hybrid (17-20 degrees) in the bag along with a 3-metal or 4-metal. I don't recall if any had zero fairway woods, and all hybrids.

I was mainly watching for hybrids as long-iron replacements. Several of the women carried 3-irons, but I didn't see any 2-irons.

During May, I used a hybrid instead of a 5-wood, but went back to a 5-wood, which I hit longer and straighter.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Adams is now selling what they call wood hybrids. As someone who struggles on occassion with my woods, I'm very interested in trying them out. They are the 9032ti.
Driver :Adams Speedline 9032LS 10.5*
Woods:Wilson Staff FYbrid 3W
Hybrids:Wilson Staff FYbrid (wood/hybrid gap)
Hybrids:Ben Hogan Edge CFT 3H & 4H
Irons:King Cobra S9 5I-PWSand Wedge:Cleveland CG12-58*Putter:Ping Redwood AnserBall:Nike Karma/Topflite GamerFavourite Gizmo:Club Caddy

Posted
I use a hybrid instead of a fairway wood. Its almost the same feel as a wood, but in my opinion they are much harder to hit then a wood and aren't as forgiving.
In my bag:
Driver: Burner
Irons: R7's
Hybrid: Burner
Wedge: CG14 Putter: white hot

Posted
I have always struggled with inconsistently with my fairway wood. Companies make hybrids with 15 degrees of loft, which is basically a 3 wood...

Yeah I use a Titleist 585.H 17* utility with stiff flex Aldila Prototype shaft to replace my old Ping G2 5 wood of the same loft. The utility is easier to hit and has a lower, longer and more consistent flight. Also just purchased a 13* (3+) 909F3 Fairway wood and it goes a mile even into wind.


Posted
My sig line is current.

I dabble with different set ups.


I've seen both sides of it. I replaced my 7 wood with a 3 hybrid.

I think I'll keep the 3 wood in the bag.
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Note: This thread is 6003 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Like others have said, get fitted. Since 2011, I have played some combination of 4W + 7W. I had a Cobra 3H and 4H a couple of years back, and would swap out the 7W for a 3H in cold months (keep out of cold wind, and rough thinner for wayward drives.) The 7W matched up with yardage often with 3H; the current 4H goes almost as long as 7W, but has a lower trajectory. 4H also bumped out 4i in last bag redo; I learned to hit stinger with 4H so that's my driving iron on tight holes with shallow landing area. Again, a side-by-side test will tell you which way to go. If 5W or 3H is meh, keep the 7W. Also, are you looking to replace the 7W with a 5W or 3H, or add a second bridge club (5W or 3H) to your bag?
    • Makes sense and aligns with other literature. Static stretching, especially for longer durations, can impede performance in strength and power activities. I would not want to do like hamstring, quad, and calf stretches then go immediately sprint. To me that sounds like a terrible Idea. I would rather start off walking, then jogging, then running, then ramp up to sprinting.  To me, static stretching isn't even a warmup activity. I like the term warmup; you want to get some exertion going before the activity.      a { text-decoration: none; color: #464feb; } tr th, tr td { border: 1px solid #e6e6e6; } tr th { background-color: #f5f5f5; }
    • Going to Florida for the usual February golf trip, and with our current weather, that date won't get here soon enough. Heading to Augusta GA for the Tuesday Master's practice round, will definitely get some golf in while I'm in the area for a few days. Hope to be able to catch up with @coachjimsc if he's around. Then it's back to Scotland first of July.  Playing 7 new courses, can't wait for that.  Then somewhere after that is the Rhode Island CC Member-Guest and then my normal October golf trip to Myrtle Beach.  
    • It sucks to carry around a lot of water, but ideally it should be way more than we think.  I buy those gallon jugs of water and hang them from my pushcart when I walk. I agree with the electrolytes as well. You don't just sweat out water, but you lose electrolytes as well. 
    • A 2010 study from the Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research compares the effects of different pre-round stretch routines for competitive golfers. Active Dynamic Warm-up: Swing Medicus driver, hit 3 shots each with selected clubs. Passive Static Stretches: Various athletic stretches such as hamstrings, chest stretch and reverse trunk twist. The subjects were collegiate golfers with a HDCP index of 5 or less who engaged regularly in strength and fitness routines. All golfers had two test days: one with active dynamic (AD) warmup, a second with AD followed by static stretches (SS). The results were then compared, within golfers and across golfers. For performance testing after the warmups, golfers hit three driver shots at time 0, 15, 30 and 45 minutes after the warmup. The study shows that static stretch formats produced poorer performance outcomes in the four measures shown in Table 5, which shows Time Zero results. The performance deficits under the PSS protocol decreased over time. Some suggestions on why the passive protocol was tied to lower performance than the active protocol: The passive stretches routine induced excessive range of motion,  basically producing wobbles in the golf swing. Other research indicates that the stretching produced slack in the tendons, lessening the amount of muscle force that could be transferred into the shot. One caveat: The study had good scientific controls and balancing of treatments (test routines). This was, however, an exploratory study and raises as many questions as it answers. Also, although the study was done back in 2010, it is still cited as a primary work in recent reviews. A quick online search did not reveal any follow-ups on the study. For those interested, the study PDF is below. PassiveStretchGOLF.pdf  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.