Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Scrambling recovery?


Note: This thread is 5970 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
You may be referring to the times when a player finds himself not having reached the green in regulation and must get an up and down for par.

Posted
Not finding the green in regulation and getting par or better on the hole. Doesn't matter if you're in the rough, fringe or bunker.

"He's scrambling well today", means a player is missing a lot of greens, but playing well around and on the greens so he still manage to score par or better.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
okay. So what it means is that is you have say a 25% GIR, you would like atleast a 50% scramble recovery?

Posted
You would always want 100%. If you miss 33% of the greens, which would be 6 greens and get up and down 3 times, you have a 50% scramble recovery. If you get it up and down 6/6 times, you have a 100% scramble recovery. This is of course depending on the severity of your misses, your shortgame and putting. Keeping record of it is a way to track your progress in the shortgame.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Okay, I see now. My last time out, I was 50% fairway, 28% GIR, 50% sand save, 1/2, and like 10% scramble. Is this kind of average for most golfers? I had 36 putts, : (, but i still shot an 89. For right now, thats pretty good for me unfortunately, but I should easily be in the low 80's to high 70's.

Posted
It sounds like your short game needs work. Hitting 28%- 5 greens in regulation should yield 5 pars minimum, but for a good player 4-5 genuine birdie chances. 36 putts is reasonable in theory if you hit 18 GIR though you would still expect some 1 putts. But if you miss your GIR you are essentially meant to scramble. You miss 72% GIR, I would work off the basis that you should have taken 26-28 putts in that round. Of the 13 greens you have missed you've played the chip/bunker shot but taken 2 putts far too many times. Obviously some shots from off the green are harder than others, but if you have a short to medium range chip the goal is to get it in the hole or real close.

Note: This thread is 5970 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 5/6* ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ 🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛ 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Now we’re getting all science-y.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.