Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Shaft stiffness calculations


Note: This thread is 5932 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Are there set numbers of swing speeds that declare what stiffness of shaft you should have (mainly driver)
(EX. 85-95 regular flex, 96-110 stiff, so on and so on)

people have told me just from looking at my swing that i need stiff shaft. but i went to a simulator and my SS was only like 96-98, but i have also heard these things could be way off.. my main reason for asking is because im pretty sure im not hitting my driver as long as i should(as i hit my snakeeyes 3 wood as long as my '09 burner most of the time), and im wondering if its because im not getting enough flex/lag in the shaft or not. Also some of the time my drives sky rocket instead of making a piercing ball flight. even on the center sweet spot hits.

:cobra: Speed ld-f 10.5 Stiff
:snake_eyes: 3 & 5 Woods
:adams:A4 3 hybrid
:bridgestone: J33 Forged Irons 4-pw
:ping: 50th Aniv. Karsten Ansr Putter56*, 60* wedges


Posted
I was on the simulator not too long ago right after I JUST got off being sick (still like 99.6 temp haha). Anyway, I was averaging like 102 SS, and the guy there told me I was hitting better with a regular flex shaft than with a stiff shaft. I'm going to be looking into the weight and the flex of the shafts I have. I think the weight of the shaft I have right now is like 60 grams, and a stiff flex. I'm looking to get a 75 gram shaft, and maybe regular flex. Hope It helps :)

~RHPM

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha Diablo 9º
2 Hybrid: Callaway Big Bertha Heavenwood
Irons: Nike Slingshot OSS 6-3 iron
          Taylormade Tour Preferred PW-7 iron
Wedges: Cleveland CG14 50º, 54º
              Taylormade RAC 58º
Putter: Ping Darby 32" shaft


 


Posted
Each company has different flexes. One's stiff might be another's x-stiff. There are many factors like kickpoint, tip stiffness, length, etc. I am sure there is probably a blanket number you could use, but it could vary by manufacturer.

The other big factor is the the quality of the swing. I have seen people with slower (but excellent) swings and they might use an x-stiff. Other people with really fast swings might use a regular or stiff because they their swing isn't good enough to control a stiffer shaft.

Best thing is to try as many as you can and see what works best.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.


Posted
Each company has different flexes. One's stiff might be another's x-stiff. There are many factors like kickpoint, tip stiffness, length, etc. I am sure there is probably a blanket number you could use, but it could vary by manufacturer.

i have the stock TM re-ax superfast 60g stiff shaft

:cobra: Speed ld-f 10.5 Stiff
:snake_eyes: 3 & 5 Woods
:adams:A4 3 hybrid
:bridgestone: J33 Forged Irons 4-pw
:ping: 50th Aniv. Karsten Ansr Putter56*, 60* wedges


Posted
What did the clubfitter running the simulator have to say?
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
What did the clubfitter running the simulator have to say?

there was no club fitter. i just went to golf galaxy and used it my self.

:cobra: Speed ld-f 10.5 Stiff
:snake_eyes: 3 & 5 Woods
:adams:A4 3 hybrid
:bridgestone: J33 Forged Irons 4-pw
:ping: 50th Aniv. Karsten Ansr Putter56*, 60* wedges


Posted
Each company has different flexes. One's stiff might be another's x-stiff. There are many factors like kickpoint, tip stiffness, length, etc. I am sure there is probably a blanket number you could use, but it could vary by manufacturer. The other big factor is the the quality of the swing. I have seen people with slower (but excellent) swings and they might use an x-stiff. Other people with really fast swings might use a regular or stiff because they their swing isn't good enough to control a stiffer shaft. Best thing is to try as many as you can and see what works best.

Hit the nail right on the head. My swing speed is around 105. I play with a 75 gram x-stiff with 8.5 degrees of loft. I need the x-stiff because of how I load and release the club at impact. Other people that have smooth swings can play softer shafts with faster swing speeds. It's all very individual so one thing will not work for everyone.

My swing thoughts:

- Negative thinking hurts more than negative swinging.
- I let my swing balance me.
- Full extension back and through to the target. - I swing under not around my body. - My club must not twist in my swing. - Keep a soft left knee


Posted
There are many factors like kickpoint, tip stiffness, length, etc.

Tip stiffness more or less dertimines the kickpoint, no? The stiffer the tip, the higher the kick point. The softer the tip, the lower the kick point.

Hit the nail right on the head. My swing speed is around 105. I play with a 75 gram x-stiff with 8.5 degrees of loft. I need the x-stiff because of how I load and release the club at impact. Other people that have smooth swings can play softer shafts with faster swing speeds. It's all very individual so one thing will not work for everyone.

Exactly and why it's crucial to get fitted correctly. When I was fitted on the Trackman, my average swing speed was around 110. I have a 9.5 degree with a 68 gram stiff shaft (AxivCore Red) but I have a more Ernie-like swing so I don't really overpower the shaft.


Posted
To the OP, I was talking to one of the guys at my local golfsmith and he was explaining to me that these simulators have to be calibrated fairly often. From what he's seen, he said that some of the numbers are fairly accurate (SS, ball speed, spin rate, launch angle, etc.). The simulated distance and dispersion are touch and go.
My SS seemed to average around 105 with some of the swings peaking at 112 and some bottoming in the low 100s.

FWIW, I found that the tee height contributes to my actual trajectory. When I tee it with about 50% of the ball above the top of the club, it goes high. When it's about 30% above, it's my desired piecing trajectory.

I find MiniMoe's and the others are saying very interesting about the type of swing being a factor. This also validates a lot of my thinking as of late. I have a very smooth swing with my irons, but my driver swing is almost violent. Needless to say, I'm much more consistant with my irons than my driver. So I can probably benefit from a heavier shaft and slowing down my swing. I have the 49gram reax btw. It's a feather.

'09 Burner (UST ProForce V2 77g - S)
4dx 15.5 hybrid (UST V2 - Stiff)
'99 Apex Plus 3-EW (Stiff)
TM rac 50/6 GW
Arnold Palmer The Standard SW (20-30 years old)'99 Dual Rossie Blade


Posted
the weight of the shaft play a big roll in how it acts during the swing. I can't swing a lightweight shaft, even if it is a double x stiff. They just don't keep up and the head lags too much at the bottom. I have been fitted by one of San Antonio's best club fitters. I totally disagreed with him on his assessment of what I need in terms of shaft and degree of loft on the driver. Some of the fitters go by the numbers alone to determine what someone "need" or does not "need". IMHO, that is just the beginning of the fitting process. I want someone that will work with me to find a driver that fits my needs and expectations. I don't want someone to tell me that the numbers don't lie and I need to change my swing to fit the driver that is "optimum" for me.

Don't get into a hurry. It takes time to find the right driver/shaft combo.

My swing thoughts:

- Negative thinking hurts more than negative swinging.
- I let my swing balance me.
- Full extension back and through to the target. - I swing under not around my body. - My club must not twist in my swing. - Keep a soft left knee


Posted
the weight of the shaft play a big roll in how it acts during the swing. I can't swing a lightweight shaft, even if it is a double x stiff. They just don't keep up and the head lags too much at the bottom. I have been fitted by one of San Antonio's best club fitters. I totally disagreed with him on his assessment of what I need in terms of shaft and degree of loft on the driver. Some of the fitters go by the numbers alone to determine what someone "need" or does not "need". IMHO, that is just the beginning of the fitting process. I want someone that will work with me to find a driver that fits my needs and expectations. I don't want someone to tell me that the numbers don't lie and I need to change my swing to fit the driver that is "optimum" for me.

So if the club head lags too much at the bottom, does this mean your shot would result in a push if you were to swing a lightweight shaft ?

'09 Burner (UST ProForce V2 77g - S)
4dx 15.5 hybrid (UST V2 - Stiff)
'99 Apex Plus 3-EW (Stiff)
TM rac 50/6 GW
Arnold Palmer The Standard SW (20-30 years old)'99 Dual Rossie Blade


Posted
for me it was always a push when the club lagged too far behind. Then after a while, I started to compensate and flip the wrists to try to get it to hook after the push. Finally I realized the shaft was crap and I changed.

My swing thoughts:

- Negative thinking hurts more than negative swinging.
- I let my swing balance me.
- Full extension back and through to the target. - I swing under not around my body. - My club must not twist in my swing. - Keep a soft left knee


Posted
I am looking to make a change this winter and going to a heavier stiffer shaft. I am going to get the stuff so I can install it myself (something to do). I like my current head and the shaft works for me, sometimes. I like the way the shaft feels but I can feel it flexing a ton and if I am quick at all, it becomes unplayable. I was considering purchasing a 75 G UST pro force s and give it go. I like my ball flight right now so I am a little wiery because I don't want to lose the hieght I hit it, I just want control and something I can go after and don't miss right because of the shaft.

Does that option make sense or should I do as I preach and just go have a quality fitter help me? I think club building will be fun but don't want to make a bunch of mistakes either and waste money I can't afford to waste.

Brian


Note: This thread is 5932 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.