Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5893 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I just hit the MP58 and 2008 AP2 both with PX 5.5. All I can say is WOW. Both of these irons felt amazing. The MP58 felt a little bit more buttery but the AP2 still felt great as well. The top line of the MP58 was a little thinner and looked a little bit better at address.

Why not get an iron suited to your GAME, not an iron that will hinder your mishits.

What I Play:
Wilson Mini Stand Bag | PING G10, 10.5°, Proforce V2 HL S | PING G5, 15°, 18°, Aldila NV 75 S | PING G5, 19°, Aldila VS Proto By You 80 S
Mizuno MX200 4-PW S | Ping Tour W 50/12 X | Ping Tour W 58/TS X | A selection of putters, all 35.5 inches.

Posted
Why not get an iron suited to your GAME, not an iron that will hinder your mishits.

I agree 100% with this post. "Players" irons will always be there and I wouldn't rush in to buy something over your head. I've heard the 57's and 58's are forgiving enough for a 12 Hcp or so..... However a friend of mine, a legit single digit Hcp, got rid of 57's because they would punish him severely on distance with mishits. You should be looking at the AP1's.......

R9 460 9.5
R9 3-Wood
Irons AP1 4-PW
Wedge X-Forged 62*, 56*, 50*
Studio Select 34" MS Newport 2 TP Red


Posted
I don't think either club is over my head. I can hit either fine. Yes I might make mis hits once in a while but that just means I need to practice some more. For whatever reason I hit the GI irons about the same if not a little worse.

Bag: Corza Stand Bag
Driver: Launcher 460 Comp 9.5
Woods: Burner 3/5
Irons: TA7 Tour 4-PW
Wedges: 588 Tour Action 51*/57*Putter: Two bar blade center shaft


Posted
I would say go ahead and get what you want. You have the itch, it won't go away. I do the same thing. I have my eye on the new Titleist CBs coming out. Beautiful club, but know they are beyond my current ability to hit them consistently.

R9 460 9.5
R9 3-Wood
Irons AP1 4-PW
Wedge X-Forged 62*, 56*, 50*
Studio Select 34" MS Newport 2 TP Red


Posted
I would say go ahead and get what you want. You have the itch, it won't go away. I do the same thing. I have my eye on the new Titleist CBs coming out. Beautiful club, but know they are beyond my current ability to hit them consistently.

Those are some beautiful clubs. If you have enough time to dedicate to practice I say you should get them.

As for me, I think I'm going to get the AP2. It will be more forgiving on mishits and it is cheaper. If I really want it, I can trade in for or get the MP58 later.

Bag: Corza Stand Bag
Driver: Launcher 460 Comp 9.5
Woods: Burner 3/5
Irons: TA7 Tour 4-PW
Wedges: 588 Tour Action 51*/57*Putter: Two bar blade center shaft


Posted
My advice? Take your money and use it to buy some lessons. Your clubs are not whats causeing your 27 handicap, its your swing. Hate to sound like a jerk but its true.

Posted
My advice? Take your money and use it to buy some lessons. Your clubs are not whats causeing your 27 handicap, its your swing. Hate to sound like a jerk but its true.

I agree with this post. Why punish yourself on mishits with a players iron? When you could just get a set of game improvers which HELP your game. It is just new club confidence making you hit the ball good 95% of the time, and that confidence will soon wear off when you hit some shots 50 yards off the toe.

What I Play:
Wilson Mini Stand Bag | PING G10, 10.5°, Proforce V2 HL S | PING G5, 15°, 18°, Aldila NV 75 S | PING G5, 19°, Aldila VS Proto By You 80 S
Mizuno MX200 4-PW S | Ping Tour W 50/12 X | Ping Tour W 58/TS X | A selection of putters, all 35.5 inches.

Posted
Ok I was lazy and didn't change my handicap but just to clear it up I've edited it. I know you're not trying to be rude. Your input is appreciated. My money is spent on lessons. I have one almost weekly and practice anywhere from 1-5 times a week. My iron play is the best part of my game. My 100 yards in, including putting is also pretty good. It is my woods that kill me the most. My driver could also be better but I'm working on both of those.

Bag: Corza Stand Bag
Driver: Launcher 460 Comp 9.5
Woods: Burner 3/5
Irons: TA7 Tour 4-PW
Wedges: 588 Tour Action 51*/57*Putter: Two bar blade center shaft


Posted
Hi danieldsuh.
I play off single figures (UK) ordered myself a set of MP58s, now thinking bout changing them! Fine when you strike them good but when your just off you get very little back. I am thinking more like Mx300s, we dont need to make the game any harder for ourselves! Good luck in your search.

Posted
I agree 100% with this post. "Players" irons will always be there and I wouldn't rush in to buy something over your head. I've heard the 57's and 58's are forgiving enough for a 12 Hcp or so..... However a friend of mine, a legit single digit Hcp, got rid of 57's because they would punish him severely on distance with mishits. You should be looking at the AP1's.......

Really good advice, but there is simply no convincing most people on this board once they decide they want blades or player's cavity backs. I'm sure the AP2s will work, but there is no reason an 18 handicap shouldn't play the AP1s. You can learn to hit the sweet spot with cavity backs, but not be punished so severely for your mishits.

Either way, I'd go with the AP2s if they're that much cheaper.

Posted
Really good advice, but there is simply no convincing most people on this board once they decide they want blades or player's cavity backs. I'm sure the AP2s will work, but there is no reason an 18 handicap shouldn't play the AP1s. You can learn to hit the sweet spot with cavity backs, but not be punished so severely for your mishits.

The reason is that I hit the AP2's better then the AP1. I also hit the TM Tour Preferred better then the Burners. For whatever reason I just strike the ball better when I'm not hitting a GI iron with a big sole.

Bag: Corza Stand Bag
Driver: Launcher 460 Comp 9.5
Woods: Burner 3/5
Irons: TA7 Tour 4-PW
Wedges: 588 Tour Action 51*/57*Putter: Two bar blade center shaft


Posted
The reason is that I hit the AP2's better then the AP1. I also hit the TM Tour Preferred better then the Burners. For whatever reason I just strike the ball better when I'm not hitting a GI iron with a big sole.

Hey-then more power to you, my mistake for lumping you in with the crowd that thinks 20 cappers should play blades cause it will really improve their ballstriking, or those that say their ballstriking is superb but other issues are adding 10-15 strokes to their index (cause I don't buy that argument). If you hit both sets and are genuinely better with one then that is the one to choose. The AP2s are great clubs, I've got a set of 775s that slot somewhere in between the AP1s and AP2s in terms of forgiveness and size, though I'd check out the 710 series AP1s in a few weeks if you can, allegedly they are significantly improved.


Posted
Well my ballstriking isn't superb but its not bad at all. Of course there are times when I'm off but not anything major enough to make me want to shy away from a player's iron. Even if I only hit 5 out of 10 swings really well, it makes those 5 well struck shots that much more enjoyable for me. Having that feeling of hitting it really well and working to improve on the bad shots is what I enjoy about golf. Plus my misses aren't so bad that I'm severely penalized for them. Having said that, I do agree that I shouldn't punish myself TO much so I'm leaning more toward the AP2 for that little bit of extra forgiveness. Hitting these I still feel that great sensation when hitting a really good shot but enough feedback to let me know when I could've made a better swing. Thanks for the input everyone. I still haven't made up my mind yet but I am leaning more toward the AP2.

Bag: Corza Stand Bag
Driver: Launcher 460 Comp 9.5
Woods: Burner 3/5
Irons: TA7 Tour 4-PW
Wedges: 588 Tour Action 51*/57*Putter: Two bar blade center shaft


Posted
Really good advice, but there is simply no convincing most people on this board once they decide they want blades or player's cavity backs. I'm sure the AP2s will work, but there is no reason an 18 handicap shouldn't play the AP1s. You can learn to hit the sweet spot with cavity backs, but not be punished so severely for your mishits.

Speaking the truth. I thought just like alot of people on this forum last year. Went out an bought the MP 60 irons (great deal), thought I could be a real player. In one year my index went up 3 points. I was coming up 20 yards short on not so bad of strikes (not fat or thin, a bit towards the toe) and not able to make pars. I didn't break 80 all year this year (did it 3 times the year before). Anyway, I just got the Titleist 775s and it is so much better for me. I am a full club longer, hit them higher, mishits are on the front of the green. My index went down .5 after just two rounds.

I know I sound like a broken record about this but the truth is unforgiving irons will hurt most players.

Brian


Posted
I'll add a brief personal anecdote. I don't get a chance to play all that often, and while I have a high handicap, I have developed enough skills to now strike my irons well and make solid contact most of the time. It is mostly my accuracy that needs to improve. Anyway, I recently had a chance to pick up some used MP-57 irons cheaply, and figured I'd give it a shot. They came with the Exsar IS2 Tour Spec Graphite in stiff flex.

I took the MP-57 irons to the range with me the other day, together with my Big Bertha 2006 irons. To be blunt, I was shocked at how little distance I was getting with the MP-57s. I am sure it had most to do with the fact that I am just not ready to move to an iron like the MP-57, but it also could have been the shaft (to be honest, the Tour Spec graphite stiff was very stiff, maybe too stiff for me). To get any viable distance, I really had to strike it perfectly. Anything else just did not carry. The bottom line for me was that it was a good experiment, but it proved that I should be using a more forgiving iron than the MP-57.

The interesting thing was that going back and forth over the course of about 120 balls, my Big Berthas were looking more and more clunky and chunky as the session wore on. Man, those MP-57s were beautiful to look at. The "shovel" moniker for many of the GI and SGI irons really does have some truth to it. But for me, I probably should just keep playing my Big Berthas for awhile, as despite their chunkiness, they really are nice irons to hit. And if I do get the urge to switch, I will forego the tougher irons and likely go with the MX-200's from Mizuno, which I also demo'd and found very enjoyable to hit and to be a great blend (visually and playable). For me, there is simply no reason to make this game tougher than it needs to be.

Equipment:
Ping K15 Driver (10.5º) - Diamana BB R flex; Ping G15 4 Wood (TFC R flex); Ping G15 20* Hybrid (TFC R flex); Ping G15 23* and 27* Hybrids (AWT R flex steel); Ping G15 Irons 6-GW (AWT R flex steel); Ping I-Wedge 54* Wedge; CG14 BP 58* Wedge; Odyssey Black Series Tour Designs #9 Putter


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
the 2008 ap2 irons are amazing
DRIVER: titleist 910d3 9.5* project x 6.0
3WOOD: titleist 910fd 15* project x 6.0
HYBRID: titleist 910h 19* project x 6.0
IRONS: titleist 710 ap2 3-pw nippon xstiff
WEDGES: titleist vokey 52.08 & 58.08
PUTTER: scotty cameron studio select newport 2

Note: This thread is 5893 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.