Jump to content
IGNORED

Women in the British Open


Note: This thread is 7208 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Keep women on the LPGA where they belong. Michelle Wei has NOT proven herself in the least to compete on the PGA. She got humiliated at ehr home course. I would be embarassed if I were her. SHe needs to grow up and concentrate on her own tour.

  • Administrator
Keep women on the LPGA where they belong. Michelle Wei has NOT proven herself in the least to compete on the PGA. She got humiliated at ehr home course. I would be embarassed if I were her. SHe needs to grow up and concentrate on her own tour.

Fair enough opinion, but you know every US major (Masters, US Open, PGA) is technically open to women as well, right?

It's just that they never qualify, nor are they ever granted a sponsor's exemption. The British Open would simply be following suit... I'm sure you read our story on this , right?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I agree, Eric. However, I am a big advocate of keeping women in the LPGA, Men in the PGA. Women just cannot compete with the ability and skill sets of men. Granted, I am sure there are a few out there that can put up a fight, but is it really worth it? What are the proving? Until a woman wins a PGA sanctioned event, I will stand my ground. I cannot see it happening anytime in the near future.

Fair enough opinion, but you know every US major (Masters, US Open, PGA) is technically open to women as well, right?


  • 2 weeks later...
I agree, Eric. However, I am a big advocate of keeping women in the LPGA, Men in the PGA. Women just cannot compete with the ability and skill sets of men. Granted, I am sure there are a few out there that can put up a fight, but is it really worth it? What are the proving? Until a woman wins a PGA sanctioned event, I will stand my ground. I cannot see it happening anytime in the near future.

Considering both the British Open and US Opens are "Opens", the women would have to go through qualifiers to get into these tournaments. If they make it through the qualifiers then they very well can compete with the ability and skill sets of men. They aren't really trying to prove anything, they just want to see how good they are, and if I were a woman I would want to play in any of the male majors because they are the most famous golf tournaments in the world. The LPGA majors aren't nearly as well known, I think I only know one...the Kraft Nabisco one, whatever it is. I don't see why they should be kept on separate tours if they are good enough to play. Not many females have proven themselves in the tournaments they have played in, but they also haven't played in many. So far they have shown they are about as good as a mediocre male tour player, but those mediocre tour players are still on the tour and aren't criticized nearly as much as those women who have tried.

I can kind of understand why this is news, but there's always been a way for women to get onto the Open and onto Tour, Q-school. It's open to any man, woman, or child with $4500 to burn. Elizabeth Biesiegel tried it this year and didn't make it past the first phase. The day's going to come when a woman's good enough to make it through and gain full time status on Tour, and as long as they can compete that's fine with me.

Note: This thread is 7208 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 313 - I played 18 today. First and last holes were ugly, but I actually played pretty well. Driver was great, irons were alright, and the short game was better than average. 
    • Day 205 (23 Nov 24) - Worked with the alignment rod and 7i  in reference to ball position in relation to lead foot on full iron shots, noticed an increase in thinned shots last couple of rounds - better contact with the balls (hard foam) during the drill/swing rehearsals.
    • Have you gone to a fitting? A good fitting will not only give you a clubhead but a shaft, etc. that will suit you.
    • It's not like the Nike Vapor Pro are exactly a highly sought set of irons.
    • Last night I was putting my Nike Vapor Pro Irons back in my bag.  I had my sons i500’s in there the last couple months after we all went to Top Golf .  I picked up the Nike’s this past spring and they are like new.  I feel guilty using them… I have other irons that aren’t valuable that I could use instead.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...