Jump to content
IGNORED

Women in the British Open


blueteez
Note: This thread is 6995 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Keep women on the LPGA where they belong. Michelle Wei has NOT proven herself in the least to compete on the PGA. She got humiliated at ehr home course. I would be embarassed if I were her. SHe needs to grow up and concentrate on her own tour.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Keep women on the LPGA where they belong. Michelle Wei has NOT proven herself in the least to compete on the PGA. She got humiliated at ehr home course. I would be embarassed if I were her. SHe needs to grow up and concentrate on her own tour.

Fair enough opinion, but you know every US major (Masters, US Open, PGA) is technically open to women as well, right?

It's just that they never qualify, nor are they ever granted a sponsor's exemption. The British Open would simply be following suit... I'm sure you read our story on this , right?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I agree, Eric. However, I am a big advocate of keeping women in the LPGA, Men in the PGA. Women just cannot compete with the ability and skill sets of men. Granted, I am sure there are a few out there that can put up a fight, but is it really worth it? What are the proving? Until a woman wins a PGA sanctioned event, I will stand my ground. I cannot see it happening anytime in the near future.

Fair enough opinion, but you know every US major (Masters, US Open, PGA) is technically open to women as well, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...
I agree, Eric. However, I am a big advocate of keeping women in the LPGA, Men in the PGA. Women just cannot compete with the ability and skill sets of men. Granted, I am sure there are a few out there that can put up a fight, but is it really worth it? What are the proving? Until a woman wins a PGA sanctioned event, I will stand my ground. I cannot see it happening anytime in the near future.

Considering both the British Open and US Opens are "Opens", the women would have to go through qualifiers to get into these tournaments. If they make it through the qualifiers then they very well can compete with the ability and skill sets of men. They aren't really trying to prove anything, they just want to see how good they are, and if I were a woman I would want to play in any of the male majors because they are the most famous golf tournaments in the world. The LPGA majors aren't nearly as well known, I think I only know one...the Kraft Nabisco one, whatever it is. I don't see why they should be kept on separate tours if they are good enough to play. Not many females have proven themselves in the tournaments they have played in, but they also haven't played in many. So far they have shown they are about as good as a mediocre male tour player, but those mediocre tour players are still on the tour and aren't criticized nearly as much as those women who have tried.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I can kind of understand why this is news, but there's always been a way for women to get onto the Open and onto Tour, Q-school. It's open to any man, woman, or child with $4500 to burn. Elizabeth Biesiegel tried it this year and didn't make it past the first phase. The day's going to come when a woman's good enough to make it through and gain full time status on Tour, and as long as they can compete that's fine with me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 6995 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
    • Very much so. I think the intimidation factor that a lot of people feel playing against someone who's actually very good is significant. I know that Winged Foot pride themselves on the strength of the club. I think they have something like 40-50 players who are plus something. Club championships there are pretty competitive. Can't imagine Oakmont isn't similar. The more I think about this, the more likely it seems that this club is legit. Winning also breeds confidence and I'm sure the other clubs when they play this one are expecting to lose - that can easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
    • Ah ok I misunderstood. But you did bring to light an oversight on my part.
    • I was agreeing with you/jumping off from there.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...