Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5792 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm looking to replace my wedges because I'm digging way too much with them...especially on fuller shots. They were a bad purchase in retrospect. I bought them for their versatility of playing many different shots, but found that I really am only able to hit them well when I'm chipping to a pin, as opposed to trying to get to the green from 110 and in. It's really too bad because they are custom spin-milled Vokeys (TVD M grind) that cost me 200 a piece. I had them bent 1* strong to fill yardage gaps more effectively. They were 54* & 58* to start. I may trade or sell these once I find their replacement if anyone is interested. The grooves are still super sharp. I digress...

I'm definitely a digger/driver and am curious if anyone can recommend any wedges with appropriate bounce for my swing. Clearly hitting and getting fit is the ideal, but I'm looking to just research at this point. What brands (other than Scratch because I've already seen that they would work) would you recommend for someone in my position? I'm interested in Callaway X-Forged Tour, Clevelands, and Mizunos, but am open to other suggestions.

R7 Superquad

Exotics 18*

Exotics 25*

AP2 (2008)

CG15 56* & 60*

Rossa Imola 8

TP Black LDP
 


Posted
it wasn't the vokeys fault it was the person that bent them's fault, he got rid of all the bounce when he bent them and never told you.
You probably only have a couple of degrees bounce.
you'd want around 10 on the 53 and 8-ish on the 57

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


Posted
I'm looking to replace my wedges because I'm digging way too much with them...especially on fuller shots. They were a bad purchase in retrospect. I bought them for their versatility of playing many different shots, but found that I really am only able to hit them well when I'm chipping to a pin, as opposed to trying to get to the green from 110 and in. It's really too bad because they are custom spin-milled Vokeys (TVD M grind) that cost me 200 a piece. I had them bent 1* strong to fill yardage gaps more effectively. They were 54* & 58* to start. I may trade or sell these once I find their replacement if anyone is interested. The grooves are still super sharp. I digress...

I picked up a higher bounce 60* Ben Hogan Colonial last fall. They're cheap like borscht - if you can find them. I wish I'd picked up the matching 52* and sand wedge, because they were sold out when I went back.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
For your new wedges, you need to determine the rated bounce (engraved on club) and the effective bounce (adjustments for clubhead characteristics). Club designer Ralph Maltby covers this in an article called, Determining Playability of Wedges :
http://www.ralphmaltby.com/50

The Callaway X Tour and X Forged wedges (2009 reference guide) all have 10º or more bounce for the most part. A few in the lob range have 9º bounce.

I play an X Forged SW (56.14), and have good luck with it as a bunker club and fluffy rough club. My PW and GW have medium bounce, as I have a medium attack angle on my swing. If you come down steep, the Callaway wedges might be what you need. Also, some of the pre-Jaws models are selling here and there for $89 lately.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
it wasn't the vokeys fault it was the person that bent them's fault, he got rid of all the bounce when he bent them and never told you.

Bending them 1* strong would really have that much affect on the bounce? If that's the case, then having them bent back could help solve the problem right?

R7 Superquad

Exotics 18*

Exotics 25*

AP2 (2008)

CG15 56* & 60*

Rossa Imola 8

TP Black LDP
 


Posted
Bending them 1* strong would really have that much affect on the bounce? If that's the case, then having them bent back could help solve the problem right?

with high lofted wedges yes.

Ask the people at the shop you bought it at. what were the original bounces?

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


Posted
If you knew that you were a digger, then why the M's? and not the TK or V's? Bending can help, but I think you need to figure out what gaps you want to fill and then go hit some wedges. I recommend the Mizuno MP T series and I really like my Vokey Raws...

"the only thing you should force in a golf swing is the club back into the bag" --Byron Nelson

Driver 983 K 8.5 Grafalloy ProLite Stiff
Fairway Big Bertha Steel Head 4 Wood Memphis 10 Steel
Irons 3-PW CB 690 Flighted Rifle 6.0 +.50..+1^Wedges Mild Steel Raw 254-10 & 260-10..+2^Putter 8802 the...


Posted
I bought them from Bob Vokey's website. The 54* is listed as having 14* of measured bounce but 10* of Effective bounce. The 58* is listed as having 14* of measured bounce but 8* of Effective bounce.

R7 Superquad

Exotics 18*

Exotics 25*

AP2 (2008)

CG15 56* & 60*

Rossa Imola 8

TP Black LDP
 


Posted
I saw one of the mini-lessons on the golf channel this morning. They took a tee and placed it on the wedge club face to show the direction of your shot. Then they showed how your launch angle will shift if you have more "toe" or more "heel". It made me rethink how important it is to keep the wedge on the ball at the correct plane. Too much "toe" will also make a deeper divot. If you added 1* strong, you have in effect made the face dig in the ground more.

Posted
I bought them from Bob Vokey's website. The 54* is listed as having 14* of measured bounce but 10* of Effective bounce. The 58* is listed as having 14* of measured bounce but 8* of Effective bounce.

bending wouldn't make much of a difference if you've got that much bounce on your clubs.

Are you only chunking them now? because the ground is pretty soft right now. And what do you think is digging down too much? taking a divot?

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


Posted
I bought them over the winter when I was living in NY. I used to practice in a golf dome. They weren't an issue there because of the mats I was hitting off. As soon as I got them on the course the digging began. The leading edge just digs in behind the ball and doesn't come out of the turf. The contact would be okay if the leading edge wouldn't dig and ruin the shot. I used to play Cleveland CG11s (tow dot) and had no issues. I think I'll just need to get new wedges. Someone will be happy with some new wedges once I get mine replaced.

R7 Superquad

Exotics 18*

Exotics 25*

AP2 (2008)

CG15 56* & 60*

Rossa Imola 8

TP Black LDP
 


Note: This thread is 5792 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.