Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7212 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am really interested in getting the new Ping S58 irons but the shop that i work in hasn't gotten them yet and i was wondering if anyone has hit them and what they thought of them. A comparison to another iron would also be helpful if possible.
Driver: Titleist 983k 9.5 Fujikura Pro 95 Stiff
3 Wood: Taylor Made V Steel Stiff Flex
Hybrids: 2 & 3 Tour Edge Iron Woods X-Stiff Steel
Irons: 4-PW Tour Edge Progressive Irons X-Stiff Steel
Wedges: Taylor Made Fe2O3 56, Cleveland Tour Action 588 60 Low BouncePutter: Ping G5i UG-LE Ball: Bridgestone...

Posted
I play the S59's and they are great clubs for people with low handicaps and scratch golfers,for you they might not be the right clubs.
how about the Ping i5's?
What is in my Bag
s59 Tour(3-PW)
Tour Wedges (56* and 60*)
G5 Driver(10.5*)
G5 Fairways (15* and 18*) Dual Force 2 #1Home Course Indian Valley

Posted
I play the S59's and they are great clubs for people with low handicaps and scratch golfers,for you they might not be the right clubs.

No i am looking for the new S58 they aren't as "player" as the 59's but thanks

Driver: Titleist 983k 9.5 Fujikura Pro 95 Stiff
3 Wood: Taylor Made V Steel Stiff Flex
Hybrids: 2 & 3 Tour Edge Iron Woods X-Stiff Steel
Irons: 4-PW Tour Edge Progressive Irons X-Stiff Steel
Wedges: Taylor Made Fe2O3 56, Cleveland Tour Action 588 60 Low BouncePutter: Ping G5i UG-LE Ball: Bridgestone...

Posted
I play the S59's and they are great clubs for people with low handicaps and scratch golfers,for you they might not be the right clubs.

I also play the S59's and while I agree, they're more geared towards low-mid handicaps, I think someone with a 9-11 handicap could actually do quite well with them. Yes, they're "blades" but they're very forgiving, especially since they aren't "big, honkin' things."

From what I've read, the S58's are supposed to be more playable, so I would think you'd be very happy with them. Just make sure you get fitted from a PING dealer first.
In My Bag:
Driver: Titleist 983K 9.5°, Harmon HTD CB-65R
3-Wood: Mizuno MP-001, 13°, Harrison Striper Titanium
Hybrid 1: TaylorMade Rescue Mid TP, 16°
Hybrid 2: TaylorMade Rescue Mid TP, 19°Irons: Ping S59 Tour 4-PWWedges: Mizuno Black Nickel 51.06 / Cleveland Black Pearl 58.08Putter:...

Posted
I have hit the new S58's and they are very nice. As far as them being less "player" I think you are wrong. From what I was told by the reps and from what I saw they are even more geared toward the better player than the S59's. They look even more like blades and have slightly less offset. The longer irons were designed to have higher trajectory, and the shorter irons were designed to have a more boring trajectory. They did that by moving some weight around not by making them any more "forgiving". I would compare them to my Nike Pro combos, or really any player iron besides a blade. I really liked them and are considering ordering them, but for people with higher handicaps I would definately steer them towards another model like the i5, G5, or the new rapture irons.

Danny    In my :ping: Hoofer Tour golf bag on my :clicgear: 8.0 Cart

Driver:   :pxg: 0311 Gen 5  X-Stiff.                        Irons:  :callaway: 4-PW APEX TCB Irons 
3 Wood: :callaway: Mavrik SZ Rogue X-Stiff                            Nippon Pro Modus 130 X-Stiff
3 Hybrid: :callaway: Mavrik Pro KBS Tour Proto X   Wedges: :vokey:  50°, 54°, 60° 
Putter: :odyssey:  2-Ball Ten Arm Lock        Ball: :titleist: ProV 1

 

 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I have hit the new S58's and they are very nice. As far as them being less "player" I think you are wrong. From what I was told by the reps and from what I saw they are even more geared toward the better player than the S59's. They look even more like blades and have slightly less offset. The longer irons were designed to have higher trajectory, and the shorter irons were designed to have a more boring trajectory. They did that by moving some weight around not by making them any more "forgiving". I would compare them to my Nike Pro combos, or really any player iron besides a blade. I really liked them and are considering ordering them, but for people with higher handicaps I would definately steer them towards another model like the i5, G5, or the new rapture irons.

by being less geared toward player... i meant that they are a little more forgiving than the s59 and that they didn't have a blade like style to them... but thanks

Driver: Titleist 983k 9.5 Fujikura Pro 95 Stiff
3 Wood: Taylor Made V Steel Stiff Flex
Hybrids: 2 & 3 Tour Edge Iron Woods X-Stiff Steel
Irons: 4-PW Tour Edge Progressive Irons X-Stiff Steel
Wedges: Taylor Made Fe2O3 56, Cleveland Tour Action 588 60 Low BouncePutter: Ping G5i UG-LE Ball: Bridgestone...

Posted
by being less geared toward player... i meant that they are a little more forgiving than the s59 and that they didn't have a blade like style to them... but thanks

They do have a blade like style to them even more so than their predecessors the S59. They are not more forgiving than the S59 other than they are redisigned with different trajactories in mind. Remember, the S59 did not go over well, especially with the tour guys. These clubs are in no way redesigned with the higher handicapper in mind, these were redesigned to perform better in the hands of the professional and accomplished amateur. Ping already has several models for the higher handicapper or golfer looking for forgiveness. Why would they redesign their "players" irons to compete with them. The entire reason for the S59 and S58 was to try and entice players looking for more workablility than their other Ping iron lines provided.

Danny    In my :ping: Hoofer Tour golf bag on my :clicgear: 8.0 Cart

Driver:   :pxg: 0311 Gen 5  X-Stiff.                        Irons:  :callaway: 4-PW APEX TCB Irons 
3 Wood: :callaway: Mavrik SZ Rogue X-Stiff                            Nippon Pro Modus 130 X-Stiff
3 Hybrid: :callaway: Mavrik Pro KBS Tour Proto X   Wedges: :vokey:  50°, 54°, 60° 
Putter: :odyssey:  2-Ball Ten Arm Lock        Ball: :titleist: ProV 1

 

 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 7212 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Ok, I'm trying to find a feel to hit a consistent ball flight (irons).  My current predicament.  1. I try to do the arms down stuff better, with the club feeling like it is way behind me more. It's just a cluster of results. Most of the time, I can't get any speed on the swing. If I get my arms down faster, I just throw them out.  2. I focus all my attention on turning better. Pushing off with my left leg and getting my right side through better. On the DTL view, this doesn't produce anywhere close where the hands and club should be. The result is usually ball first contact, lower ball flight, more centered contact.  At this point, I am going with option 2. Stop thinking about what the hands do. Just make a shorter backswing, keep it wide, turn through. Somehow, the club head finds the ball. My focus is so much on just making sure I turn, it's like, "Oh, that contact was better.... Oh, that bell flight looks playable." If not, I will just be practicing my entire summer.       
    • Nope, they spent too much money. They are in over 28 million on the football roster and related NIL compensation at this point. Boosters associated with any Texas college football team has HUGE sway. The AD is between a rock and a hard place. They put a lot of money into Sorsby, at the chance of winning a NC this year. If you move on, you basically wasted a lot.  This is why Ohio State wants 3 QB's they feel can start. That is why the backups the past 5 years at some point transfer. Texas Tech has no backup near the quality of Sorsby. If they move on, they are screwed for 2026. 
    • Maybe there's something I still don't understand about the situation. Wouldn't Texas Tech do itself a favor to move on from Sorsby at this point?      
    • Day 281 6-10 Full swing, fast, getting low point ahead of "towel".  Working on flow during this seems to help. 
    • Wordle 1,817 3/6 ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.