Jump to content
IGNORED

R7 vs. Cleveland Launcher Comp 460


Note: This thread is 6964 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Anyone tried out both the R7 and the Launcher Comp 460? What are your thoughts. How does the distance and accuaracy compare? And how do they compare with control(Shot shaping)?

Titleist 905R 8.5 w/ UST V2 75 S
Taylor Made R7 TP TS 13 w/ Vista Pro 80 XS
Titleist 695cb 2i w/ Rifle Project X 6.5
Titleist 695.mb 3-PW w/ Rifle Project X 6.5
Titleist Vokey Tour Chrome 54.14 w/ Project X 6.5Titleist Vokey Tour Chrome 60.08 w/ Project X 6.5Titleist Cameron Studio Style...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Anyone tried out both the R7 and the Launcher Comp 460? What are your thoughts. How does the distance and accuaracy compare? And how do they compare with control(Shot shaping)?

Distance wise, if you've got a good swing and the right shaft you'll be hitting the same distance with any modern driver head IMHO, it's all about how you want to get there.

Pretty much every comp driver I've tried (Wilson, Cleveland, Cobra) has such a low and deep center of gravity that the launch ends up being ridiculously high. If you can't get the ball up in the air, they're a good choice, but I'll be sticking with conventional all titanium drivers for now. One thing I do like about the Cleveland is that it sits nice and square at address, I've never seen one with a hook face. The R7's a great club head, I'm guessing you loved it since you seemed so set on getting a 905. The deep face is really low spin and once you find the center of the club face it's just going to explode. As far as working the ball, you've got to be an iron byron to effectively work a 460cc. Not even Tiger's got the repetitive swing to control his draws/fades with that big a club head (as his accuracy numbers have been showing). I may catch a lot of heat for this, but I really feel the days of workign the ball with the driver are pretty much dead as long as you've got decent distance. Just bomb it out there, and I bet you'll be doing that with the R7. Just out of curiosity, did you happen to get on teh launch monitor with the R7? I'm curious to see if it lowered your spin numbers any.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
I may catch a lot of heat for this, but I really feel the days of workign the ball with the driver are pretty much dead as long as you've got decent distance. Just bomb it out there, and I bet you'll be doing that with the R7.

I never disagreed with you, but if I think about it, it seems right. It seems that whatever swing I put on my driver, I get a soft little fade...

If you want to work the ball, perhaps the play is to use your 3-wood and learn to hit it far by hooding it down to 13 degrees or so.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I never disagreed with you, but if I think about it, it seems right. It seems that whatever swing I put on my driver, I get a soft little fade...

You definately weren't the one to disagree with me about working the ball iacas, there are a lot of members at my club who think that just because they get a hook out of a driver that's 3° closed, they're "working the ball."

From everything I've seen and read, it seems that the larger the headsize is, the harder it is to close the face and get a draw out of it. To combat this, manufacturers are starting to increase heel weighting and building drivers with shut faces to help higher handicappers close the face at impact and fight the slice. Of course, then there are guys like Vijay who plays with a driver that's 4° open.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I love my R7. I got it last friday, and couldnt be happier. I have gone from an average of 276 off the tee with my 983E to 296 average with the R7. And am hitting it longer each time out. Today I played nine and went out off #1 cold. I hit it stiff 310 yards. No warm up other than some light stretching and a few practice swings. I hit 6 of 7 drives 300+, the 7th was a miss hit and still went 260 yards with a draw. Wow this thing is long. This thing is as accurate as it long. I am averaging 10 of 14 FIR with the r7 apposed to 6 of 14 FIR average with my 983E. 50% of my misses is my misalignment. This thing is great.

I have it setup with the slight draw bias. And hit it dead straight or a slight draw. Havent really messed with the weights. I am currently using the stock Taylor made stiff shaft, but have ordered a grafalloy blue stiff. I am going to wait to install the new shaft as the stock shaft is helping me smooth out my tempo. It has helped with all my clubs. I am hitting the ball better than ever.

I really am not sure what the deal is with this club and me on the launch monitor. According to it I shouldnt be hitting the r7 as well as I hit my 983E. But I am, I am killing it. I think alot of it may have been the fact that I was trying to hit it too hard in the shop on the monitor. Now that my tempo is getting more smooth I am going to go in and retest before and after reshafting. So we will see what the deal is then.

Titleist 905R 8.5 w/ UST V2 75 S
Taylor Made R7 TP TS 13 w/ Vista Pro 80 XS
Titleist 695cb 2i w/ Rifle Project X 6.5
Titleist 695.mb 3-PW w/ Rifle Project X 6.5
Titleist Vokey Tour Chrome 54.14 w/ Project X 6.5Titleist Vokey Tour Chrome 60.08 w/ Project X 6.5Titleist Cameron Studio Style...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Awesome to hear, I figured you'd be picking up a few extra yards with a S flex shaft. A lot of people think that since a stiffer shaft bends less more energy goes into the ball from the swing. It's actually the opposite - more like a spring, and the more bend you can have in the shaft the more energy goes into the ball. When John Daly competed against the long drive guys he switched out to an R flex. The problem is with very fast swings which can overpower R and S flex shafts, hence long drivers, but that's all changing now with shafts like Fujikura's Zcom which are superlight weight but still very low torque even with 130-140 mph swings.

Once again congrats on your new driver. You're putting up some awesome numbers. If you keep killing it like that, I say put that Grafalloy in the closet until needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I appreciate it. I am going to put the grafalloy away for a good while until my swing speed comes up enough to really get the use out of it. Or I might just let the shop keep it. It depends on what they are willing to do. And again thanks for all the help in my search.

Titleist 905R 8.5 w/ UST V2 75 S
Taylor Made R7 TP TS 13 w/ Vista Pro 80 XS
Titleist 695cb 2i w/ Rifle Project X 6.5
Titleist 695.mb 3-PW w/ Rifle Project X 6.5
Titleist Vokey Tour Chrome 54.14 w/ Project X 6.5Titleist Vokey Tour Chrome 60.08 w/ Project X 6.5Titleist Cameron Studio Style...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This thread started off by asking about the Cleveland Comp 460, and I tried that out at an indoor simulator at Golf Galaxy the other day. I hit it pretty good, but incredibly high, even with the crappy, stubby tee in the mat. The salesperson tried to explain that this driver is supposed to hit it higher than any of the others. When I asked him something about optimum launch angles, he didn't really have a response, I guess he was just feeding me the line he got from Cleveland. I agree, it looks good behind the ball.

In terms of being able to work the ball with the large drivers, I agree, it is next to impossible. Also, I was watching a "Playing Lessons from the Pros", months ago, with Paul Casey. He said that he recently began driving the ball much better because he had given up on working the ball with his driver and just bombing away.
Tom G.
Balls, Sticks, & Stuff &
The Sand Trap .com
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 4 weeks later...

I tried Cleveland 460 and I do have r7. What I hate about Cleveland is that "hollow" feel / sound on impact. It's just not solid enough for me. r7 is a great sounding club. As one of you mention before - with today's technology with a good swing you'll hit a good driver from any manufacturer. For me it's more about look, feel (and since I'm a gadget fan - the screws are awsome ) and r7 beats Clev hands down.

Of course it's just my opinion and I could be wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

SHot a 81 today with a new driver and going out stone cold. I feel pretty good about it considering that. I hit the launcher 460 comp, and loved it. Longest of all the clubs I tested. I hit it 3/4 speed cause it had a stiff nv and I need a X shaft. Even with the 75-80% swing I was carrying it 15 yards further than my 983, r7, or the 905. It is long and straight.

Titleist 905R 8.5 w/ UST V2 75 S
Taylor Made R7 TP TS 13 w/ Vista Pro 80 XS
Titleist 695cb 2i w/ Rifle Project X 6.5
Titleist 695.mb 3-PW w/ Rifle Project X 6.5
Titleist Vokey Tour Chrome 54.14 w/ Project X 6.5Titleist Vokey Tour Chrome 60.08 w/ Project X 6.5Titleist Cameron Studio Style...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Cant wait until I get the X shaft and i can really get at it. Should be awsome!!!

Titleist 905R 8.5 w/ UST V2 75 S
Taylor Made R7 TP TS 13 w/ Vista Pro 80 XS
Titleist 695cb 2i w/ Rifle Project X 6.5
Titleist 695.mb 3-PW w/ Rifle Project X 6.5
Titleist Vokey Tour Chrome 54.14 w/ Project X 6.5Titleist Vokey Tour Chrome 60.08 w/ Project X 6.5Titleist Cameron Studio Style...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 6964 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 120 - Played 18; much better than yesterday. Miss right now is off the heel of the club, so I need to sort that out. 
    • Today we played Pease Golf Course in Portsmouth, NH. Course was in great shape but my game didn't show up. I will say I pitched and chipped fairly well but almost everything else was very hit or miss. Cost myself a lot hitting an in play drive with pulling my approach shots maybe 85% of the time. Finally figured out I had been swaying most of the round. Only took me until 13 to figure it out. Used what felt like a much more centered turn and the ballstriking improved. 18 tomorrow using a 2 man scramble format. Just looking to contribute. Been a blast though. 
    • Day 22: Hit balls with 7-iron using mevo+ to track dispersion. Was out for a long time after work; 86 balls but the first 50+ were 50% swings focusing on top of backswing feel and then just hitting the ball as a psychic reward. Finished with 20 balls close to full speed. Pretty happy with dispersion and also no horrendous misses. I’m chunking my priority piece out into two separate feels, first and more important is the position/balance at top of backswing which is what I was working on. Once I have that engrained I’ll move to transition part. 
    • FWIW I never really had issues with the previous generation of Snells. But… I'm not sure I played them a ton, either.
    • I know Dean Snell designed the original Pro V along with a couple of other brands tour balls.  How exactly does the Snell ball have problems.  Did he change something in the design or is a manufacturing error since he cannot afford the unlimited R&D budgets of the big manufacturers to iron out flaws
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...