Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
assassin307

Ping Eye 2's

Recommended Posts

I would buy a set of Eye2's that fit you, are in good shape, having matching serial numbers, have the set make-up you want, etc. $210 for such a set is OK IMO.

Thanks for the advice!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Ping Zings were the best set of irons I ever owned and foolishly sold. Luckily I never gave up the eye 2 irons and never will. My son-in-law has been trying to pry them from me for years. My every day irons are Ping G10's, nice steady club but I will use the eye 2 every 3rd or 4th time I play. The grooves sre getting bad and will need to work on them over the winter. Anyway Zings are another great product from Ping.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do have a bit of a slice, so these may work. I found a set of Zings in a local store for $159, but they set was missing the 9 iron. I also found a set of eye 2's in the same store for $210, with all the clubs in the set (3-w I believe). Prices seem ok? Both were in good condition, but could use new grips.

To me, those prices are a bit high, the Zings at $159 are worthless w/o the 9..there is no resale value for a set missing pieces, the only thing they are good for is a jr set or sold off in pieces. $210 for the eye seem alittle high ($30-60) high, unless they have new grips and are in great great shape. The salesman is partial to his paycheck NOT your golf experience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To me, those prices are a bit high, the Zings at $159 are worthless w/o the 9..there is no resale value for a set missing pieces, the only thing they are good for is a jr set or sold off in pieces. $210 for the eye seem alittle high ($30-60) high, unless they have new grips and are in great great shape. The salesman is partial to his paycheck NOT your golf experience.

The price on the Zings is good, but I agree that they are worthless without the 9 iron. One can always pick up a Zing 9 iron on Ebay, probably for very little money, but the serial number (and possibly the shaft and grip as well) will be different from the rest of the set. Karsten Mfg. will not change the serial number. Zings are sort of the bastard child of the Ping family. Not too many people like them but those who do are pretty fanatical about them.

I definitely agree that $210 is a little pricey for a set of Eye 2's. I checked Ebay just a few minutes ago and saw several sets with "Buy It Now" prices of less than $200, not to mention several auctions that are ending soon and have high bids of less than $200.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I definitely agree that $210 is a little pricey for a set of Eye 2's. I checked Ebay just a few minutes ago and saw several sets with "Buy It Now" prices of less than $200, not to mention several auctions that are ending soon and have high bids of less than $200.

If you buy them on Ebay you don't know exactly what you're getting, or if the seller is honest. And even if he is, you still need to pay shipping (which for a set of irons is going to be more than $10 bucks, even more if insured), and then wait 2 weeks or so during prime golfing season to get them.

So if the OP has found a set that he has tried, that suit him, in a store, for $210, that he can take home and start using immediately, it seems like a good deal to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you buy them on Ebay you don't know exactly what you're getting, or if the seller is honest. And even if he is, you still need to pay shipping (which for a set of irons is going to be more than $10 bucks, even more if insured), and then wait 2 weeks or so during prime golfing season to get them.

1. Ebay provides seller feedback ratings, and these should always be checked when bidding on an item. I always do and in 12 years of buying on Ebay I have never been burned. Moreover, anyone paying with Paypal for an Ebay item automatically gets a customer satisfaction warranty that provides for a full refund if the item is not as described.

2. It doesn't take two weeks to ship clubs anywhere in the continental U.S. With Priority Mail it takes two days. With parcel post it usually only takes a couple of days more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a set of ping eye 2's blue dot.I got them last year when i started to play golf and i quickly got my handicap down from 36 to 26 in the space off a couple off weeks their so easy to hit with.

I would recommend anyone starting out to pick up a set.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Ebay provides seller feedback ratings, and these should always be checked when bidding on an item. I always do and in 12 years of buying on Ebay I have never been burned.

I do a fair amount of business on ebay, so I think I can speak with some experience that feedback ratings don't guarantee squat despite your own happy experience. And priority shipping ain't free.

As for how long it would take to get them, the best case scenario is that the seller ships them without delay, which is not always the way it is. In any case, if you can find them near you and test them first, for the same money as it would cost to order them and get them shipped to you, why would you buy them online?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To me, those prices are a bit high, the Zings at $159 are worthless w/o the 9..there is no resale value for a set missing pieces, the only thing they are good for is a jr set or sold off in pieces. $210 for the eye seem alittle high ($30-60) high, unless they have new grips and are in great great shape. The salesman is partial to his paycheck NOT your golf experience.

I was able to get a set of black dot Zings 3-SW, new grips and matching serial #'s for less than that from Golf Galaxy. I would keep looking.

A few weeks ago there was a set of Eye 2s on CL locally for $75. I really wish I would have jumped on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a set of ping eye 2's blue dot.I got them last year when i started to play golf and i quickly got my handicap down from 36 to 26 in the space off a couple off weeks their so easy to hit with.

This is what I found in the store. I may go back today and take a better look at them. Perhaps try to work on the price as well.

I must admit its nice walking out with them in hand and seeing what I am buying vs ebay. But i understand there are great deals to be had on ebay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do a fair amount of business on ebay, so I think I can speak with some experience that feedback ratings don't guarantee squat despite your own happy experience. And priority shipping ain't free.

I do more than a fair amount of busines on Ebay and I am quite positive I can speak from experience. Reputable sellers value their feedback ratings and wise buyers know this. As I said previously, anyone who pays via Paypal (which is how the vast majority of items are paid for these days) gets a money back guarantee.

And of course priority mail shipping isn't free. For the average golf club shipment it's about $10.90 and the buyer receives them in 2 days. Virtually all reputable sellers ship the day payment is received; otherwise, offering priority mail shipping would be pointless, so your argument about sellers delaying shipment has no merit. Finally, the idea here is to save a few bucks, not to spend the same amount. You obviously haven't been paying attention to my argument. As I said before, I have seen many sets of Eye Two's on Ebay for less than $200. With priority mail shipping a set of Eye Two's that sells for a final price of $150 would end up costing $161. That's considerably less than what it costs to buy them in a store.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont worry about dot color! You can ship the set back to ping at anytime and they will bend to adjust lie to any color code you want. They will also weaken or strengthen the loft. The whole set will cost you $18 total. 2 weeks from the time you send them, they will be back to you. They clean, repaint the bottom groove white, paint the numbers again and change the color code on the iron. Get the best deal you can on the set and ship them to ping. I just got mine back. I bought them 12 years ago and needed to adjust the lie from gold to orange. Best customer service in the business!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont worry about dot color! You can ship the set back to ping at anytime and they will bend to adjust lie to any color code you want. They will also weaken or strengthen the loft. The whole set will cost you $18 total. 2 weeks from the time you send them, they will be back to you. They clean, repaint the bottom groove white, paint the numbers again and change the color code on the iron. Get the best deal you can on the set and ship them to ping. I just got mine back. I bought them 12 years ago and needed to adjust the lie from gold to orange. Best customer service in the business!

There are limits to the adjustability of Eye2 dot color (i.e. lie angle) as spelled out on Ping's website here:

http://www.ping.com/about/clubrepair.aspx In short, some Eye2 models can be adjusted a maximum of 2 degrees, other models cannot be adjusted at all. So telling someone "Don't worry about dot color!" is very bad advice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ping Eye-2 ranks as a SGI club with an MPF above 700.

What clones did you have, I had a set I bought in 85' called Tiger Eye. I haven't seen any other sets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There are limits to the adjustability of Eye2 dot color (i.e. lie angle) as spelled out on Ping's website here:

You and I may disagree as to whether it is better to buy on Ebay as opposed to a shop, but on this point I agree with you wholeheartedly. A golf pro I know who is an authority on all things Ping says that in many cases when Eye Two's are bent to a different lie angle due to some elasticity characteristic in the metal they will eventually revert back to that at which they were originally cast. Obviously the color code is important and for that reason I would not buy a color code other than the one that is right for me with the expectation that it can be bent to my specifications.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do more than a fair amount of busines on Ebay and I am quite positive I can speak from experience. Reputable sellers value their feedback ratings and wise buyers know this. As I said previously, anyone who pays via Paypal (which is how the vast majority of items are paid for these days) gets a money back guarantee.

I thought we were talking about a set on ebay that was $200. If we are talking about a set that is significantly less than that, then I agree it could be cheaper and possibly better for the OP to go this route. Personally, though, I still like to try before I buy . . .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I ended up buying a set of Zing 2's in very good condition. I will try them and see what I think. If I don't like, back they go and I will try the eye 2's. Thanks for all the help!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • That's dumb. If you are "developing your swing" it's made better by the right amount of feedback. And > 1/2 of the time, the "feedback" doesn't even really include what the ball does. The ball flight takes care of itself. It is. Significantly so. From 140 yards, the gap in fairway vs. rough is a fifth of a shot. From 160, a quarter of a shot. There you go again putting words in my mouth, or (willfully?) mis-remembering stuff. I've pointed out the opposite many times: that the advances in equipment have narrowed the gap between players like Tiger and his peers. You couldn't mis-hit a muscleback 2-iron. You can mis-hit a 3-hybrid a little and still do okay. The gap in skill has been artificially reduced. Jack says it. Tiger says it. I've said it. Of course the modern ball is the "best" BALL "ever." But I've never said it's the best thing for the game, or makes the game most interesting, or whatever you're actually trying to say. 0 for 2 there @Jack Watson. Sorry. Yet… you were wrong. They didn't. They hit down. They launched the ball too low, and with too much spin.
    • The bottom line is very simple.  If you are developing your swing or a students is it made better by more or less feedback?  I recommend anyone developing to use the highest spin balls they can find because it gives more feedback. Higher spinning ball is more feedback.  Tour players today would hit straighter with a ball just like a Pinnacle.  Rocks were available back in the day.  No spin isn't what pros want in a ball.  They don't choose no spin because of many reasons. Often players now aim at rough because it's often not what anyone would call rough.  I think it's obvious that I was not making a statistical argument there just pointing out a tendency in the modern game that shows how course setup is weak/favors bomb and gouge brainless golf.  Rough is supposed to be harder to hit from than fairway.  That's also lost on modern gamers for the most part. Joro will agree,  he was there.  A higher spin ball helps separate wheat from chaff.  So many pros agree on these points...You seem to be somewhat alone in your contention that modern golf is the best thing ever... Anyways I have to go so no more time now for this...  I used caps because it's insulting to people to tell them they didn't know what they were doing. Again Best wishes to all for a safe holiday!
    • You can't go back to that, because pros could simply play a 1997 Pinnacle and hit it long and straight. The only thing about the new ball is that they made the 1997 Pinnacle spin more with shorter clubs. So wrap a 1997 Pinnacle in some softer outer layers, and bam, you've accomplished nothing. Balls are better now. So are clubs. So is the understanding that pros have to how important power is in the game. No, it's correct. When players first got launch monitors, the vast majority were hitting down too much, generating too much spin, and effectively hitting ballooning, rising shots. The Frank Nobilo piece, for example, says: So no, it's not arrogant or incorrect. It's perfectly valid. Nobody said anything about gear effect. Yell about it then. Sorry, no. You're simply and provably wrong here. Where do you come up with this bullshit? The rest I've left alone as it's your opinion and that's fine, but don't just spout out shit like it's fact when it's not, please.
    • I know  for myself as a golf fan I want to be able to watch golf and have it entertain me.  There's really only three tournaments anymore I pay attention to Masters British and US Open.  The last couple years the US has been a dud but I keep watching hoping it will once again become the ultimate test. I want to see the best quality golf.  I think that's where this whole discussion of distance comes in.  Nicklaus Snead et all for the most part could swing much faster than they did.  Sometimes they would bash one but not usually.  Hogan did some long drive stuff at times early on and he was puttin the wood to it espescially for his height.  In order to score best these guys played a golf swing that was not maxed out because the ball spun so much that slight misfits were truly bad you had to manage the strike just right at high speed to keep spin down and get the launch right or it would be an embarrassing balloon ballflight.   They were playing the game of skill not the game of maximum speed alone.  Very self disciplined approach.  It kinda makes me mad when I hear younger folks say "part of the reason for the distance now is that players understand launch conditions better" Really?  To me it's preposterous to try to assert that modern players only in the last few years learned launch conditions.  It's also arrogant and incorrect.  Like gear effect also.  Heel low cuts and toe draws were shots people practiced with balata back to Jackie Burke! THE BALATA PLAYERS WERE MASTERS OF SPIN COMPARED TO THE GUYS NOW!  TO SAY THAT THEY DID NOT KNOW WHAT THEY WERE DOING IS ABSOLUTELY VERY VERY INSULTING TO THEM AND ANYONE WHO IS CONNECTED WITH THEM!   They were masters because the higher spinning ball gave them much better feedback while developing their swings.  You have to know how to create certain launch conditions to get that balata out there like Norman or Nicklaus or whoever.  Maybe they did not know their numbers on Doppler but they ALL knew who could do it and who couldn't and more I,portent how THEY did it.  Now they are all bashing it because there's no reason not to.  The ball  doesn't spin as much and the clubs are forgiving.  The courses are setup so that being in the 'rough' is better than the fairway. You get brain dead robots like DJ out there hitting miles.  Where's the variation and challenge?  Where are the courses made to challenge the modern technology?  It's not good for the tour to make the game into a distance contest.  They are marketing the thing poorly and results have been showing and will show the next few years as more and more courses close. Golf with a higher spinning ball would be so cool to even watch on tv with shot tracer.  That's what golfers used to aspire to the low launch and correct shape.  They might not hit as far as pros but the shaping that's what's been totally lost today. I think with a game focused on power and distance over self control and skill you get a bore.  With most tour stops it's like watching a Ferrari F1 car racing a guy in a Prius.  (The Prius being the course.) A golfer with the skill of Corey Pavin simply couldn't make it today and that's sad.  Guy was a great competitor striker of the ball.  He was shaping fw wood shots into greens.  You don't see that stuff anymore and really the younger crowd doesn't know what they don't know.   To me the whole game of golf boils down to decisions and self knowledge and control and is made more interesting the more difficult the course gets.   With the modern week to week game with older courses and modern clubs it's basically a free minus six or more every week due to par fives alone for a good touring pro. This is a long rant to forgive me.  I just wish golf were more entertaining now.  It's largely not.  I'd like to see the pros have to face the challenge of a higher spinning ball and takeaway Some for and max volume on drivers and fw clubs.  The reason for this is I want to see what kind of level mankind can reach in this game.  I want to see the best quality.  IMO the way the game is goin is wrong for that.  It's a putting contest now.  They all bash it they all hit greens it's just who gets a hot putter. I wanna make it more challenging and truly separate the wheat from the chaff.  To me that would be more interesting. Or we can just leave things as they are and really never know what a great golfer is truly capable of because the game now really doesn't require that skill anymore.  Heck just carry a driver some short irons and wedges and a putter.   Sorry for the rant but many of us get angry when it's said that modern players have been taught new things by trackman.  Sorry guys,  equal some Nicklaus or Hogan or Knudson et all scores with balata then you can talk.  That's real feedback hit ball watch ball.  Ball no do what you want do something else! Happy Holidays!      
    • One thing I like about our semi-private course is that everyone is very friendly and welcoming. Our seniors group is fun to play with, although they sometimes forget that I'm one of the unretired! and have to go to work most days. The course is a Nicklaus design with lots of challenging holes. The drawback is that the developer envisioned Winged Foot Way Out West, sporting a private-equity membership with everyone living in $400,000 homes. Thus, he contracted for an extremely difficult course with lots of bunkers. Legend has it that Nicklaus cautioned the developer against going overboard on the difficulty of holes, and the complexity of the bunkering (as in high maintenance costs). Well, much less $$ showed up than was forecast, and the developer was forced to sell. Fast forward, the greens crew has had a rough job in recent years trying to keep the bunkers in repair. A few pits have been removed as they settled out oddly, or ended up permanently flooded.  But, those remaining really keep the greens crew busy. We just don't have a Winged Foot maintenance budget. One other drawback: the driving range is at the top of a sloping hill, so it's a bit had to determine your true club carries because you're hitting down hill. Overall, I really like the course, the crew and the members.
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. DeadMan
      DeadMan
      (31 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.