Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

"Boring" Final Round of Open Championship??


Note: This thread is 5653 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
That's true. I don't recall where, maybe on here, but I read about someone who played a round with a pro on a normal course. He said it was neat, but ultimately dead boring.

Isnt that the running joke in like every golf club? If you had a boring round you had a good one? I guess thats the same for us amateurs as for the pros.

Burner 9°
FW Burner 15°
Burner Rescue 19°
MP67 4-PW
CG10 50° CG12 DSG 54° & 60°


Posted
Isnt that the running joke in like every golf club? If you had a boring round you had a good one? I guess thats the same for us amateurs as for the pros.

Yeah, I'd kill for a round with no "fun" shots...

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted
It may have been a bit boring, but watching Louie work his magic Sunday more than made up for it.

Driver.... Nickent DX Evolver V2 65 stiff /07 Burner YS6+ stiff .
4 wood..... Nickent 4DX
Hybrids.....Tour Edge Geomax 22* 25* 28*
Irons.....TM R7 6-P + AW,SW,LW
Putter.....Odyssey White Hot XG 2 BallBag.......Callaway ORG 14 A.L.I.C.E. Ball........Bridgestone e6 / Srixon Soft Feel...


Posted
It stopped being a gripping viewing experience when Casey triple-bogeyed. Yes, Louis played really well - and I mean REALLY well, his control and accuracy in the breeze were amazing. But an exciting competition where the ultimate winner wasn't known till the last putt? Er....no.

It was disappointing that no-one really came after him. Probably the most exciting round was McIlroy's - but he was too far back, after Friday (a collapse that still has me puzzled - he has played in those conditions before, at Holywood, Portrush and Co Down. Heck, he grew up on them). That Lee Westwood came through with a strong one wasn't a surprise - but too far back, again. Darren Clarke seemed to want more wind - his performance on Friday was amazing.

It has been pointed out that Woods' win in 2000 got a lot of people excited. It did and his last round was nothing more than a triumphal procession. So maybe PR and hype are the key to keeping it interesting? I hope not - I'd rather see on the TV close contests between big names (and there were big names there - look at the final leaderboard) a couple of underdogs. So Pebble Beach was more of a spectacle than St Andrews, this year.

What to do? Well, it could be that the pin positions on Sunday were, as Monty observed, such that defensive golf was the only option. If so, maybe the powers that be should look back and remember what Bobby Jones so liked about St Andrews - the oppoprtunity to take a variety of different routes to the green. Some of them would be paths leading to glory; some would lead to disaster. It's what the Masters does, when it does it right - hold out the chance of immortality. And Jones originally modelled Augusta on St Andrews, as far as I can gather...

Just mho.

Posted
There was a moment of doubt. When he was up only 3 strokes with a lot of holes to play. Then he not only shut the door but SLAMMED it. So there was a moment there when at least I was thinking this could get really interesting. Other than that I still enjoyed the final round.

In my SasQuatch carry bag.
909D2 9.5* (Aldila Voodo Shaft)
FT 3W 15* (Fujikura E370 Shaft Stiff Flex)
FT Hybrid 21* Nuetral (Fujikura Fit On M Hybrid Stiff Flex)
FT Hybrid 24* Nuetral (Fujikura Fit On M Hybrid Stiff Flex)Irons: X22 Tour 5 thru PW (True Temper Dynamic Gold S300) 2* upright (also...


Note: This thread is 5653 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.