Jump to content
IGNORED

Do I need a rangefinder?


Note: This thread is 4831 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Just get a hunting range finder for $100. It won't have pin seeking but it'll find your yardages just fine and will save you $200.

Waiting out the 2 feet of snow that just dropped on the course....

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Do NOT buy a hunting rangefinder.  The electronics (programming) of a hunting rangefinder are opposite of what you want for a golf rangefinder.  The hunting rangefinder is programmed to ignore small objects and search for large objects so that it ignores branches, brush, etc. in order to 'see' the large object (game such as deer, etc.).  The golf rangefinder looks for the small objects (flag, pole, etc) and that's what it can return the range to.  It also sees large objects (such as hills, sides of sand traps, trees, etc.) and returns those ranges too.  So, you can use the golf rangefinder for distance to the flag as well as the hill behind the green, the sandtrap in front of the green, the tree at the bend in the fairway, etc.  A hunting rangerfinder may not see the flag, especially if there is no wind.

With regard to whether or not to buy a golf rangefinder - I bought one about three years ago and wouldn't be without it.  It saves me at least 3-5 strokes per round (18 holes).  I don't have a 'home' course.  I prefer to play different courses as much as possible and find it invaluable for both tee shots as well as approaches.  But, I also have a very good idea of how far I hit each club.  Shortly after I bought my rangefinder, my golfing buddy also got one.  He also knows his club distances and found knowing the distance to the green (from my rangefinder) was saving him 3-5 strokes per round.

With regard to brands – I bought the least expensive Nikon I could find (about $275) and he bought an inexpensive Bushnell (about $250).  My Nikon performs much better than his Bushnell.  I can ‘see’ the flag much better across all weather conditions (no wind, windy, whatever) than he can.  At close ranges (less than 160 yards) it really doesn’t matter, but at longer ranges it makes a difference.  It may not matter with more expensive units from each manufacturer, but it does seem to matter with the lower end units.

One last item – GPS versus rangefinders.  They both have their pluses and minuses.  Many of the GPS units (especially the better ones) require a subscription in order to keep their data (maps, distances, new courses, etc.) up to date.  A rangefinder just needs batteries.  But, a GPS can ‘see’ around hills and a rangefinder can't.  I opted for the rangefinder.  By the way, I worked on developing and supporting the GPS system and still decided to go with a rangefinder.  It is more accurate overall and actually has a small amount of magnification so you can see where you are hitting to better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I use a skycaddie and love it! The battery lasts about 5-6 rounds. The strange thing though is my best round ever,83, I shot at a course I never played without it. I think not using one made me think more and take my time but it really does help me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I purchased Golflogix and having the exact front, middle and back yardages helped my game by reinforcing confidence on a shot to the green.  It also sped up my round by eliminating the need to pace out yardages from sprinklers or the 150, 200, etc yards stakes.  All I have to do is pull up to my ball and boom, there is the yardage.

With a rangefinder, the same would apply.  Keep in mind that you don't only have to laser flags.  You can laser trees in the distance, sand traps, water, front of the green, people, whatever you want.  You can also easily laser stuff from other fairways vs. pacing out the distance from a sprinkler or yardage stake all the way on the hole that you were playing.

The point is, a rangefinder is much more versitile than ONLY flag lasering and for me, knowing how much room I have to "play with" yardage wise while course managing helps tremendously.

Deryck Griffith

Titleist 910 D3: 9.5deg GD Tour AD DI7x | Nike Dymo 3W: 15deg, UST S-flex | Mizuno MP CLK Hybrid: 20deg, Project X Tour Issue 6.5, HC1 Shaft | Mizuno MP-57 4-PW, DG X100 Shaft, 1deg upright | Cleveland CG15 Wedges: 52, 56, 60deg | Scotty Cameron California Del Mar | TaylorMade Penta, TP Black LDP, Nike 20XI-X

Link to comment
Share on other sites


They are pricey, but worth it. Bushnell makes the best. I use a Garmin G5 because I was given it by a member. I love it, you are able to pinpoint yardages. I prefer the display ones, but Bushnell makes a damn good laser finder. I used the free apps on my Droid and did not like them, the battery is sucked up faster than you can snap hook one OB. If you use your phone though, put it on Airplane mode and leave your GPS on (or disable wireless communications). I was able to keep my phone fully charged alive for about 4 hours when I did that. If you got the cash go for it, if not, the phone apps will do just fine.

titleist.gif 910 D2 10.5 -- Diamana A'hina X
titleist.gif 909 F3 15.0 --  Matrix Ozik X-Con
titleist.gif 910 CB 4-PW -- Project X 6.0
cleveland.gif CG10 52, 56, 60.
cameron.gif   Studio Design 1.0   titleist.gif Pro V1    c2_beer.gif It's a Wisconsin thing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


My take on rangefinders vs gps vs nothing at all -

Having either a rangefinder or gps is like having a microwave: No one needs a microwave, but once you've had one, you can't live without it.

I have had a rangefinder, a gps, and a gps app on a droid phone.  I prefer the rangefinder, I like to know the exact distance to objects (i.e. flags) rather to the middle, front or back of the green.  I don't think the gps on a mobile device is all that accurate, and as such i think the yardages on a mobile device are inconsistent (at least with my anrdoid phone).

Driver : ping.gifG15 10.5* Serrano Stiff
3W: callaway.gif RAZR 15*
Hybrids : adams.gif A7 19*
4- PW : mizuno.gif MP - 63
Wedges : vokey.gif50*, 54*, 60*Putter: cameron.gif Scotty Newport 2.5Bag: sunmountain.gif 2011 SunMountain C-130

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by ronbo25

My take on rangefinders vs gps vs nothing at all -

Having either a rangefinder or gps is like having a microwave: No one needs a microwave, but once you've had one, you can't live without it.

I have had a rangefinder, a gps, and a gps app on a droid phone.  I prefer the rangefinder, I like to know the exact distance to objects (i.e. flags) rather to the middle, front or back of the green.  I don't think the gps on a mobile device is all that accurate, and as such i think the yardages on a mobile device are inconsistent (at least with my anrdoid phone).

Couldn't agree with you more. I really never fretted over distances too much before I started getting really serious. I was fine walking off distances and taking educated guesses at courses I was familiar with. However, once I used my Droid for distances, that all changed. I hated the phone apps because they killed my battery faster than I could play. I personally am not a big fan of rangefinders where you shoot your own distances, I always am shaky on the pins and am annoyed when branches or trees are in the way. Laser-Links are great, but useless at most muni's and resort courses.

I'm on a vacation now in Palm Springs, and when I played the other day I brought my Garmin G5 Approach with me, and forgot an extra set of batteries. My batteries were dead upon arrival, and it was the WORST round I've had in years. I still used my phone app, but I really missed distances to bunkers and hazards, etc. Once you have one, there is no other way to play, that's for sure.

titleist.gif 910 D2 10.5 -- Diamana A'hina X
titleist.gif 909 F3 15.0 --  Matrix Ozik X-Con
titleist.gif 910 CB 4-PW -- Project X 6.0
cleveland.gif CG10 52, 56, 60.
cameron.gif   Studio Design 1.0   titleist.gif Pro V1    c2_beer.gif It's a Wisconsin thing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4831 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • A couple of things.  Some of the clubs in your bag should be dropped immediately.  A 2-iron for example with what obviously seems to be a lower swing speed or possibly not great swing yet is a definite no-no.  To be hitting that 120-140 yards, which I assume includes run, is a sign that you are not getting the ball airborne at the correct angle to maximise distance.  The reason your 3 and 5 hybrid are going the same distance is that your launch angle is better with the 5.  Loft is your friend. Ideally I would suggest going to a golf or sporting store where you can hit golf balls on a simulator without being disturbed to understand your club carry distances and hopefully swing speed.  With that information we can definitely guide you better.
    • Let us be clear, unless you have proof of cheating, you just sound like a case of sour grapes.  In our club we have a guy who won club titles for many years.  Yes, he was a low single digit handicapper, but there have been quite a few others who played at his level.  Yet his mental strength and experience helped him win in many years when he shouldn't have.  Did he sandbag.  DEFINITELY NOT.  Did he just minimize his mistakes and pull out shots as and when needed.  Definitely.
    • Day 111 - Worked on my grip and higher hands in the backswing. Full swings with the PRGR. 
    • First off please forgive me if this is not a proper post or not in the proper location, still learning the ropes around here. Second, it's important that I mention I am very new to the game with only about 10 rounds of golf under my belt, most being 9 holes. Only this year have I started playing 18. That being said, I am hooked, love the game and am very eager to learn and improve. To give you an idea of my skill, the last 2 18 rounds I played were 110 and 105. Not great at all, however I am slowly improving as I learn. Had been having bad slicing issues with the driver and hybrids but after playing some more and hitting the range, I've been able to improve on that quite a bit and have been hitting more straight on average. Irons have always come easier to me as far as hitting straight for some reason. Wedges have needed a lot of improvement, but I practice chipping about 20-30 mins about 3-5 times a week and that's helped a lot. Today I went to the range and started to note down some distance data, mind you I am averaging the distances based off my best guess compared to the distance markers on the range. I do not currently own a range finder or tracker. From reading some similar posts I do understand that filling gaps is ideal, but I am having a some issues figuring out those gaps and understanding which clubs to keep and remove as some gaps are minimal between clubs. Below is an image of the chart I put together showing the clubs and average distances I've been hitting and power applied. For some reason I am hitting my hybrids around the same distances and I am not sure why. Wondering if one of them should be removed. I didn't notice a huge loft difference either. The irons I have are hand me downs from my grandfather and after playing with them a bit, I feel like they're just not giving me what could potentially be there. The feel is a bit hard/harsh and underwhelming if that makes sense and I can't seem to get decent distances from them. Wondering if I should be looking to invest in some more updated irons and if those should be muscle backs or cavity backs? My knowledge here is minimal. I have never played with modern fairway woods, only the classic clubs that are actually wood and much smaller than modern clubs. I recently removed the 4 and 5 woods from my bag as I was never using them and I don't hit them very well or very far. Wondering if I should look into some more modern fairway wood options? I appreciate any feedback or advice anyone is willing to give, please forgive my lack of knowledge. I am eager to learn! Thank you.  
    • I would think that 3 in a row with the same players might get some behind the scenes examination from the SCGA if they were suspect.  Are there any clubs questioning the results?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...