Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7013 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I started golfing a few months ago and bought this set from K-Mart to get started.

It's served me pretty well thus far, but I have some concerns that it's beginning to hold me back. I do OK with the irons though I don't hit nearly as far as a lot of folks seem to (100 yds, with a 9i), but the 3 & 4 hybrids and woods don't seem to agree with me nearly as well. The shafts seem unduly flexible for one thing and I can't get any kind of consistency especially with the hybrids. Lately I've been able to get decent results driving with my 3-wood (around 200' off the tee and generally straight-ish) but I wonder if I'm actually getting better or just learning how to hit that particular club.

Budget is a concern so simply replacing my entire set isn't an option at this point. I'd like to get a club or two at a time to try and spread out the cost of replacing everything, but don't really know where to start.

I can hit my 5i pretty consistently to 150 yards. My 3 & 4 hybrids go more or less 165 & 185 with much less consistency in both distance and accuracy. The 3 & 5 wood I hit very inconsistently (except off the tee with the 3 as noted above) and let's not even talk about the driver.

So the advice I'm seeking is whether any of you have any experience with these el-cheapo sets & what might be holding me back. If there's any possibility of a new driver significantly improving my distance & accuracy I would probably prefer to start there since distance off the tee is my #1 biggest flaw. If not, I'd consider starting by replacing the hybrids and starting from the bottom up so to speak. I'm also wondering about whether I could expect a higher quality (Callaway, Cleveland, etc.) brand of irons to perform significantly better than my current irons.

I realize that without seeing my swing it's hard to offer advice, but let's concentrate on the equipment for this post.

Thanks in advance.

Posted
Since graphite shafts are more expensive it is possible that poor quality graphite shafts are in the hybrids and woods. Even inexpensive metal shafts are at least ok. If you are generally athletic you may be generating to much clubhead speed for the shafts in this kind of set. Your short iron distances will improve as your swing does. I agree with the advice to test out a swing / launch monitor. I would actually look at replacing a fairway wood first, probably the 5 since you hit the three better. I don't think it is unusual for golfers to have 2 or three different brands of woods, irons that are not matched sounds like a bad idea to me. Don't worry about the driver until you can break 95 on a good day. Unless you can reach par 5s in two it is not worth it if you can't control it.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted
Yea, I'd love to get on a launch monitor and have a pro help me out. There's no place near where I live that has one though. Looks like a road trip is in order.

Allin- the irons are steel shafted, the hybrids & woods are graphite. The hybrid shafts seem much stiffer than the woods, maybe due to being shorter, but maybe not. I wouldn't necessarily class myself as athletic, but I am a big guy, 6'-3" and well over 300lbs so maybe I am swinging too fast for those shafts. I do think I'll start with the woods, I should be able to replace both of them at once if I save my pennies.
Thanks for the advice.

Posted

I am similar in size to you (6'3" 280lbs) and I've had my irons lengthened by an 1 1/2" so I don't have to bend down as much. From what you are describing you could definitely use some stiffer shafts in your woods. The "el-cheapo" sets have poor quality very light regular flex graphite shafts. With Ebay you can get some very good deals and stay in your budget. Also, on a whim I recently went to golfsmith to check out the Mac Burrows close-outs for my "guest/2nd" set. The woods are $39 and I've had comparable results as compared to what I have in my bag. I also picked up the Powersphere 421cc for $49 and was very impressed with the results. Golfsmith just bought out Burrows golf and is selling all their components on for dirt cheap prices.

Yea, I'd love to get on a launch monitor and have a pro help me out. There's no place near where I live that has one though. Looks like a road trip is in order.

In my bag:

TaylorMade R7 Superquad - 11.5 deg - Diamana Whiteboard 63-S
Tour Edge Exotics - CB2 16 deg - Diamana Redboard 73-S
Taylormade V-Steel 24 deg - Diamana Redboard 83-STaylorMade R7 XD - 5i-AW Project X 6.552 deg Miura Forged Raw56 deg Fourteen MT-28/56V3 60 deg - Fourteen MT-28/60V2 P...


Posted
It seems to be a buyer's market for golf gear now, seasonally and overall lower demand, so now is the best time to pick up some gear that is right for you at a very reasonable cost. Find out what you need and scout out what it can be had for used.

Posted
There's always flea bay, I'm assuming you need cavities and game improvements, you can always get a new set on ebay for 400$ or a used set for 150$ depending on what models. Safe bet, go with the TaylarMade OS (newer model) This should be about 350$ for new on flea bay. Make sure its not fake!

Note: This thread is 7013 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.