Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5656 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Simple question here:

At impact for the driver where should ones hands be. I know the Snt swing says hands ahead at impact, but im after a more conventional swing perspective. The videos i have watched of most pros the hands are about level with the ball when striking the ball with the driver.

Posted

Watching this video of Scotty McCarron in slow motion, it is apparent his hands are slightly ahead of the ball at impact but the club head quickly passes his hands as he releases. Though I hit the driver pretty well this summer, I experimented with this. The only thing that I discovered was a "hook" when I tried to keep my hands behind the ball at impact.

Titleist 910D2 10.5* Stiff / Taylormade 3 Wood - Superfast 2.0 15*  3 Superfast 2.0 Rescue 18* Stiff Shafts


Posted
Interesting thread Binga. I find a stronger grip (than my old one) and the hands leading the clubhead through impact, along with learning about lag, has transformed my golf game this past year. I apply that to the driver as well. I have not hooked a ball this year. The hook was my long time nemesis. But truthfully, what I perceive as the hands ahead of the clubhead (with the driver) may in fact be more equal. I have a Casio FS10 coming in tomorrow ($99 on Amazon) and will get some 210 fps footage and see. You got me curious to be honest. I know my hands are leading the clubhead on irons. Bobby Clampett's "The Impact Zone" taught me so much. A must read if anyone has not read it. But for the driver, I can't honestly say, but I perceive my hands are in fact ahead of the clubhead at impact with my driver. When I over do it, or when I over do the lag, I tend to push my drives. However, no hooks and no slices, so for now I am content. Still working out the bugs, but these are small potatoes compared to what I was dealing with a short time ago. I was a classic flipper. No more thanks to Bobby Clampett.


-Dan

Posted
A little off subject but how does this Casio camera compare to the FH-100?

PB
Canadian PGA Life Member
Peter Boyce Golf Academy
Strathroy, Ontario
:tmade:


Posted
The Casio FS10 is $100 and the FC-100 is about $250. For $250, I would look at the FH20 or newer FH25. I have a FH20 and it is awesome. However, I work out of state and left mine back home. So I bought a FS10 so I can record my golf swing now. I don't get back home till Jan 18th. At $100 I was willing to pick up a second camera. The FS10 is much smaller than my FH20 so I will keep it in the golf bag in a small hard case I bought for it. Joby Gorilla pod (flexible and small tripod) will attach camera to golf bag. Pretty convenient. As for quality, the FS10 is the lowest, but I saw some great footage on Youtube before buying mine. Go to Youtube and search FS10 golf swing. 210 fps is a great recording speed and all these cameras will do this. In good sunlight, either of these three will work great. In low light situations, the FS10 will be the poorer performer. Amazon has all three models.

-Dan

Note: This thread is 5656 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Probably since the golfer has to swing the club back and up. The hands have to move back and up. You can feel them go back and up just by turning the shoulders and bending the right arm, because it brings your hands towards your right shoulder.  The difference is if you maintain width or not. Less width means a shorter feeling swing path so the more you need to lift the arms. Being as someone who gets the right arm bend at 110+ degrees, it's 100% a timing issue. I am use to like a 1.5+ second backswing. It probably should be like 1 second at most. Half a second or more will feel like an eternity. I have had swings where I keep my right arm straighter and I am still trying to time the downswing based on the old tempo.  Ideally, for me, it is probably going to be a much quicker and shorter (in duration) backswing, while keeping the right elbow straighter. Which also means more hinging to get swing length without over swinging. 
    • Wordle 1,789 5/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I'm currently recuperating from surgery, so no golf, but have been thinking about this quite a bit. This and the don't overbend the right arm thing. It's hard for me to even pose the position, so I'm not 100% sure, but I feel like it's impossible to have the right humerus along the shirt seam and not overbend your right arm, unless your hands are down near your hips. If the left arm is up at or above the shoulder plane and your right arm is bent less than 90 degrees, then your right humerus has to raise or your hands will get pulled apart. Your left hand can't reach your right hand unless either the right upper arm is up or the right arm is overbent. Is that right? If it is, then focusing on not overbending the right arm would force you to raise the humerus. And actually thinking further on it, if you do overbend your right arm, then you're basically forcing your upper arm down or forcing your left arm to bend. Since (for me at least) bending the left arm too much is not something I think I need to worry about, it means that the bend in the trail arm is really the driving force behind what happens to the right humerus. 
    • I managed to knock off a 3, a 13, and a 15 a couple of weeks ago. The 3 was a 185 yard par 3 with a 6 iron to 12 feet. 13 was a 350 yard par 4, which was a 2 iron and a 9 iron to about a foot. 15 was a 560 yard par 5 with a driver in a bunker, 4 iron into the semi, gap wedge to 8 feet and a putt.
    • Wordle 1,789 4/6* ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟨🟩⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.