Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7711 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am sure similar questions have been posted numerous time, so I apologize for the repetiveness of this post.

I am planning on buying a new set of irons within the next week or so and have narrowed my choices down to either Cleveland Launchers or Ping G2s. I have tried both of them out at my local shop, but they only have an indoor range, so it is a little hard to judge my ball flight in the 10 feet between the hitting mat and the net. Would anyone mind giving me their opinions on either set?

As far as background, I am a high handicapper (this will be my second full year playing). I would like a set of clubs that will make the game enjoyable now, but that I can also grow into. Also, the $150 price difference isn’t really a consideration.

Posted
...either Cleveland Launchers or Ping G2s....

I'm Taylor Made fan and didn't find a match for fine-tuned Quad r7 TP... but between these two - from my own experience - pick G2. Distance-wise similar, look similar with slight edge to G2, forgiveness - definite G2 edge, I think sound is the only complain I had about G2... But do you care how it sounds when it's way down the middle of the fairway ?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
To clarify...
It sounded like you took my post to mean that I was considering buying a driver. Actually, I am refering to a set of irons.

Posted
To clarify...

oops, indeed - I wasn't aware Clev has "Launchers" irons ;) Haven't seen them, haven't hit them. Please disregard my response

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Tell us a bit about your game? If you're a higher handicapper, I'd really consider going with the Pings. I know a lot of good players that still use the Pings they got 10 or 15 years ago.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
This is my second full year playing and I guess it would be best to describe my game as it stood at the end of last year because I am still trying to get some of the rust out. I have never "truly" broken 100 (i.e. not using any mulligans). I normally hit a 6 iron 155 yards, but as is the case with most beginners, I am very inconsistent. Ummm, whatelse? I don't really have a problem with slicing or hooking, but more of a problem hitting shots fat or thin. I have asked various people at my local golf shop and they have all said that the Cleveland Launcher irons are the easiest to hit and that they would recommend them ahead of the G2s. Which leaves me a bit confused because I thought the G2s were supposed to be some of the easiest clubs to hit.

Another question I have is that I have always hit a 3 wood off the tee, but I am looking at getting the Ping G2 driver. I am a bit confused with the options of shafts and lofts. What are the differences between Aldila and Grafalloy? Based on the distance I hit my 6 iron (155 yards) does it seem like I would just need a regular flex shaft? Also, is 10 degrees probably the optimal loft to get for me? I should mention that I know it ultimately comes down to what feels right, but I just wanted to get input from more experienced people who have gone through this whole thought process before. Thanks!

  • Administrator
Posted
This is my second full year playing and I guess it would be best to describe my game as it stood at the end of last year because I am still trying to get some of the rust out. I have never "truly" broken 100 (i.e. not using any mulligans). I normally hit a 6 iron 155 yards, but as is the case with most beginners, I am very inconsistent. Ummm, whatelse? I don't really have a problem with slicing or hooking, but more of a problem hitting shots fat or thin. I have asked various people at my local golf shop and they have all said that the Cleveland Launcher irons are the easiest to hit and that they would recommend them ahead of the G2s. Which leaves me a bit confused because I thought the G2s were supposed to be some of the easiest clubs to hit.

Between the Pings and the Launchers, pick the clubs you see yourself using the longest. In other words, as you get better, which are you likely to keep longer? What's their "playable range"? If one stops being effective when you hit an 18 handicap and the other at 9, I'd go for the one that ends at 9.

As for the shafts, get fitted. IT's free if you buy the driver, usually, and it's the best thing you can do for your game.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
My view with the G2's and the Launchers is that there isn't going to a tremendous amount of difference between the two clubs. It seems Cleveland kept the G2's in mind when the made the Launchers. Both clubs have similar qualities. Example: oversized heads, low center of gravity, big offset and overall qualities of a "game improvement" iron. I don't think that the differences are going to be huge between the two clubs. It might just come down to which set looks right to you... the set you feel most comfortable with.

I've read good reviews on both sets. The G2's were named Gold Digest's game improvement iron for 2005 and the Launchers have gotten great reviews from players. You might Google "G2 iron review" and "Launcher iron review" to see what players are saying. In the end its up to your personal opinion. I've got a hunch that if you stick with it either set will become very natural for you to swing and should help your confidence level.

Hope that helps.

Jeff

10.5° Callaway FT-iZ Tour

18°, 20°, 23° Adams Idea Pro Prototype Hybrid

4-9 Titleist 690.CB
48° Titleist Vokey Tour Nickel
54°, 58° Titleist Vokey Tour Oil Can

Scotty Cameron NP2, 33"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
dont forget about the taylormade HT's or OS's. since you are a high handicapper these clubs will get your ball up even on misshits. they are extremely easy to hit with great distance. i tried the ping g2 and dont get me wrong they are great clubs but the HT's are just as good with a lower price tag. i havent tried the launchers but i hear great things about them too. what you need to do is go to the store and try them out or even go to a demo show at your local range and see which set feels right for you.

In the Bag:

Driver: Taylormade r7 425 10.5
Woods: Taylormade Rescue Fairway #3
Irons: Taylormade Rac HT 3-PWWedges: Callaway Vintage Black 52 Top Flite 56 sandwedge Top Flite 60Putter: Taylormade Rosso Sport Marenello #2Ball: ...


Posted
I should have mentioned that I ended up going with the Launchers. It came down to how the clubs looked and felt at address and I just couldn't get used to the G2s. I tried some other clubs (TaylorMades included), and I ended up happiest with the Launchers. I have hit them twice at the range and played 36 holes with them and I must say that I am very pleased. I would definitely recommend them to any high handicapper looking for a set of clubs.

I also picked up the G2 driver and I never thought I would say this about a driver, but I can't stop the darn thing from going left on me. It isn't so much a hook but mor of a pull. Luckily, the ball usually ends up on the fairway, its just that it is always on the left side. Anyone lese have this issue?

Posted
One thing you haven't considered is the lofts on the two sets of clubs. I think if you check, ping is really weak lofted. Cleveland and TM are a bit stronger. Which i think you will want later as you improve. Good luck.

Posted
Forget blaming the clubs....no offense but if you truely haven't broken 100 then you need lessons not new irons, drivers or special shafts.

**I don't mean to sound like a grumpy man - It's a catch 22, you need decent clubs to play but you need a semi-consistent swing to have a good feel for the clubs...I wish you luck my friend.

Personally I started playing the G2's and loved them. I chose them becaue I liked the looks, I trust the company and I also live near them so I know if I needed adjustments I could get them done cheap and quick. Basically a set I can grow with.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Lessons would be pointless without practice and practice would be pointless without clubs. I have started taking lessons this year and if you read my first post, I have been playing golf for a total of maybe 4 months (3 months last year and 1 this year). Perhaps I am a slow learner, but from what I understand, most people haven't broken 100 after 4 months. Especially considering that I can only play occasionally on weekends considering that my job requires 80+ hours a week.

Posted
Lessons would be pointless without practice and practice would be pointless without clubs. I have started taking lessons this year and if you read my first post, I have been playing golf for a total of maybe 4 months (3 months last year and 1 this year). Perhaps I am a slow learner, but from what I understand, most people haven't broken 100 after 4 months. Especially considering that I can only play occasionally on weekends considering that my job requires 80+ hours a week.

I'm in a similar boat. I've only played twice. Shot a 64 and a 70. 9 holes. I started with K-Mart clubs, but I too, wanted something that can grow with me and I can have them for awhile. I chose Nike CPR irons, and fairway woods. I will continue to use my Ram driver for the time being. Good luck in your quest.
In my Arsenal.
Driver: R580 9.5°
Irons: Nike CPR Steel 5-PW
Woods:
Nike T40 3 Fairway Nike T40 5 Fairway Hybrids: Nike CPR 22° Nike CPR 26° UST Irod ShaftSW: Nike 55°Forged Chrome SeriesPutter: Nike Blue Chip putterBalls: Nike One or Callaway Warbirds
******************

Note: This thread is 7711 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.