Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Hi everyone...trying to put a value on an old set of clubs I was given


Note: This thread is 5171 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone.  First off, while I enjoy golfing I'm not a knowledgeable or avid golfer.  My father in-law passed away and we've inherited some golf clubs.  It is not a complete set but we'd like to sell what we have.  I haven't a clue what they are worth or if they have much value at all.  I was hoping some of the more knowledgeable folks here could offer some opinions.

Specifics:

There are three different woods [1, 3 and 4]
There are four different irons [3,4,6 and 7]

These are MacGregors and have the following marking: Tom Weiskopf PERSONAL

I figure they are 1970s or early 80s vintage. I've no idea what the entire set cost in those days.
They're all in very good condition with only the typical smudges on the bottom of the clubs and on the face. Grips are in great condition. The clubs appear to have been well taken care of.

Does anyone have an idea what they might be worth today? Is there possible antique value to these clubs or are they a dime a dozen as they say?

What might you ask per club that would be fair and reasonable?  $2? $5? $25 per club?   I know very little about golf and clubs per se so your opinions would be a big help.  I don't even know if these would be worth getting appraised.  That's why I've come here.

I figure they might make a good starter/practice set for the right person. I realize a couple of more clubs are needed.

Beagle


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
Cant really help you with the value question, sorry. But Possibly if you move the thread to the clubs section one of the regs in there might know. Just a suggestion, Cheers

Posted

Thanks dhanson for the pictures.  My club heads look closer to the top picture but without the yellow lines.

Unfortunately I cannot show you a picture but I'll try to describe it for you.

1. Same surface as top picture

2. Tom Weiskopf  is where those yellow lines appear.  His signature has first name and second name below first name

3. To the right of the signature is the word: P)E)R)S)O)N)A)L  as depicted with crescent shaped lines.

These clubs may in fact be of 1960s vintage.  I just don't want to sell them for $5 each of they have significant vintage value.

They are either vintage/antique clubs or simply "old" clubs that golfers have up in their attics.

I'll try and get a pic if I can.

Beagle


Posted

Go to eBay and do a search on those clubs. From there you'll have a way to view "completed listings" (there'll be a little box you can check on the left side of the screen) of the same sets. That's your best bet on determining a fair market value.

I collect old Hogan clubs and from what I've seen lately, the market has fallen out of the bottom, much like with most collectibles these days. I couldn't imagine your set would be worth more than $100. Particularly since you don't even have a complete set...

Callaway RazrFit Extreme 9.5 w/Project X 6.5
Callaway XHot Pro 15* 3Wood w/Project X 6.5
Callaway XTour 18* 2h w/S300
Callaway XHot Pro 4/5 irons w/S300
Callaway XForged III 5-PW irons w/S300
Callaway Forged 52*/58* Wedges
Odyssey 7 Versa 90
Callaway Hex Black Tour


Posted



Originally Posted by beagle

Thanks dhanson for the pictures.  My club heads look closer to the top picture but without the yellow lines.

Unfortunately I cannot show you a picture but I'll try to describe it for you.

1. Same surface as top picture

2. Tom Weiskopf  is where those yellow lines appear.  His signature has first name and second name below first name

3. To the right of the signature is the word: P)E)R)S)O)N)A)L  as depicted with crescent shaped lines.

These clubs may in fact be of 1960s vintage.  I just don't want to sell them for $5 each of they have significant vintage value.

They are either vintage/antique clubs or simply "old" clubs that golfers have up in their attics.

I'll try and get a pic if I can.

Beagle


If those clubs are worth $5 each that would be significantly more than expected.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Note: This thread is 5171 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.