How do you compare Burner Superfast 2.0 driver to 2009 burner?

[very handicap]

I am currently using 2009 Burner driver and loving it. However, I'm hearing a lot of good things about Burner Superfast 2,0. Just want to find out from those who have used both on how do you compare between the 2 drivers. The point is if the performance improvement is only marginal (say 5%), it just won't make sense for me to waste the money to buy a new drivers. Many thanks.

[very handicap]

Anyone can help?  Thanks.

[very handicap]

Anyone?

[very handicap]

Upz

[very handicap]

Anyone?

[Vladimir Puttin']

One is painted white, the other isn't.

[WUTiger]

How about a comparison of Superfast 2.0 to other non-TM drivers?

Got to do a real three-way driver test this summer: Superfast 2.0, Callaway Hyper-X Tour (my normal driver, made in 2008), and Callaway RazR X... all in R flex shafts, with 10.5 degree loft heads. Hit a dozen balls with each on a sunny day with light breeze.

Had a good day hitting all three. Hyper-X and RazR X pretty well tied, decent loft and carry. Superfast went nearly as far as the other two, but took off with almost a 5-iron trajectory. I told the pro about it, and he said I might be better off in Superfast with a 9.5 degree loft. Superfast felt lightest and liveliest of three, just a bit too much hang time on the ball.

Suggestion: try multiple lofts in Superfast 2.0 to see which one is best, also check different shaft combinations.

Back to your original question: Some golfers might pick up 20 yards by switching to Superfast 2.0, while others might do better with the Burner-09. Individual differences in golfers come into play here. That's why we have launch monitors, so you can compare the two on specific performance factors.