Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2588 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

is a 5.5 shaft a "stiff" shaft? whats the deal on the numbers??

 910 D2 Driver 9.5*, adams.gif Speedline Hybrid Fairway 15*, adams.gif Idea Pro Gold Tour Prototype 20*, wilson_staff.gif FG Forged Tour Irons 4-PW, cleveland.gif CG 11 Gap Wedge 52*, cleveland.gif CG 10 wedges 56* and 60*, odyssey.gif White Ice Rossie Putter

 srixon.gif Z-Star ('11)


Posted

I guess you're talking about the Project X shafts.

The higher the number the stiffer the shaft.

5.0 regular

5.5 stiff

6.0 very stiff

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha 10.5* 

3WD:  Callaway Big Bertha 15* / X2 Hot H4 Hybrid
Irons:  Callaway Apex 4-PW Project X 5.5 shafts

Wedges: Callaway MackDaddy 2  52/58
Putter: Odyessey Metal X Milled 1


Posted

yes. that answers my question, thanks

 910 D2 Driver 9.5*, adams.gif Speedline Hybrid Fairway 15*, adams.gif Idea Pro Gold Tour Prototype 20*, wilson_staff.gif FG Forged Tour Irons 4-PW, cleveland.gif CG 11 Gap Wedge 52*, cleveland.gif CG 10 wedges 56* and 60*, odyssey.gif White Ice Rossie Putter

 srixon.gif Z-Star ('11)


Posted

Here's a shaft-flex comparison chart courtesy of GolfWrx.com. It compares TT/Dynamic Gold, Project X and KBS shaft varieties using Frequency Coefficient Matching (FCM).

The different shaft manufacturers don't have a common flex rating system. This chart compares the three varieties using the FCM ratings used in Project X shafts (5.0, 5.5, etc.)

For example a Dynamic Gold S300 - rated as stiff - has an FCM of 5.8, whereas the PX 6.0 - also rated as stiff - has an FCM of 6.0... So the PX "stiff" is a little stiffer than the DG "stiff." Your 5.5 would be rated as "firm" (between regular and stiff) by PX.

FCM_chart_TTPxKbs.jpg

_________________________________________

The chart also contains subscripts on some shaft categories, ss for softstep and hs for hardstep.

  • Softstepping: You put a 3i shaft in a 4i, 4i into a 5i, etc. throughout the set. This softens the shaft by about one-third a flex.
  • Hardstepping: You put a 4i shaft into a 3 iron, 5i into a 4i, etc., throughout the set. This stiffens the shaft by about one-third a flex.

(Talk to a clubsmith about this; it's a complex process - the stepping also involves shaft length adjustments.)

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 6 years later...
Posted

Got a driver 5.0 flex, asked for a senior or light flex. Got a replacement that shows 5.0 also, sure seems like the same shaft. Anything usually available such as 4.5, 4.0 on a driver?


Posted

My clubfitter says 5.5 graphite is roughly equivalent to an "R".....However, he cautioned, "R", "S" "A", etc flexes are subjective and vary by manufacturer.  One manufacturer's  "R"  may be more like "S"  by another, and visa versa.
""


  • 3 months later...
Posted

I have a set of irons with Mizuno graphite shafts (shafts are from Japan)   ....they are labelled Lite-Flex and on the other side of the the label Flex 8...I would like to know what Flex they would be in America....also kick point if possible.

 

Thanks


Note: This thread is 2588 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.