Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4977 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can any of you experts out there explain dynamic loft to me and how it's calculated?

I came across this site giving different explanations for terms: http://3jack.blogspot.com/2009/12/trackman-translations-part-iii.html

I can't seem to do the math (never was good at it... ) and get the 11.3° dynamic loft that they get. I assume it has something to do with this part: " adjusted for the impact of the bended shaft (typical +2° for a driver)"

How do you adjust for the impact of a bended shaft for other clubs beside driver?


Posted

dynamic loft is the loft on the face of any given club at impact based on how the club was brought to the ball....be it either ascending or descending.   for instance, my driver is 6.5 * of loft....sitting still.  this is called static loft.  I hit up on the ball 4 to 5 degrees with my driver, meaning at impact the dynamic loft of my driver is 10.5 to 11.5*....which is great launch for my SS.  if I were to come into the ball dead level, my dynamic loft would be 6.5* because I hit the ball with neither an asceending or descending blow.  if I were to hit down on the ball say 2* my dynamic loft would be 4.5* and launch extremely low, and barely leave the ground.  make sense?

works the same in irons too....if a typical 4 iron is 23 degrees, and if you hit down on it 2 degrees, all of the sudden that 4 iron is a 21 degree 4 iron (which is 3 iron territory) and goes as far as a typical 3 iron......that's part of how the tour guys hit their irons so far.

Driver: Adams 9064ld 6.5* w/ Oban Devotion 7 .... 281 cpm at 44"
Fairway Wood: Tour Edge xcg 4 3 wood w/ rapport blue velvet shaft

hybrid: Tour Edge Exotics cg4 17* 2 hybrid
Irons: Miura series 1957 "baby blades" w/ KBS tour shafts
Wedges: Miura: 52* wedge, 56* K grind, 59* Y grind
Putter: taylormade white smoke 35"


Posted

I believe it is pretty simple arithmetic... If you have the tools to give you the base numbers.  The most widely recognized tool - being a Trackman.

Trackman will provide you your Attack Angle (also commonly referred to Angle of Attack or AA) which will be + or - depending on your ascending or descending swing plane... And combine (add) it to your clubs static loft (as sblack5 stated).

Thus if your Attack Angle is +3 (swinging up), and you are playing with a 9* driver... Your Dynamic loft will be ~ 12*.  I use the approximation sign (~) as you also need to take into consideration the amount of lead/lag found in the shaft which is based on the position of the lead arm and shaft angle at impact (P7).

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

That's exactly thought I thought it was calculated but reading this I'm not sure:

[quote]In the sample we are dealing with, the golfer is hitting a 6-iron which has about 32* of loft. The golfer had a -3.4* attack angle which is about the Tour average and likely had some forward shaft lean.

The result? It took that 6-iron loft and turned it into a 11.3* loft at impact.[/quote]

How do you take a 6 iron with 32* of loft with a -3.4 AOA and get a dynamic loft 11.3*? Like I wrote in my first post, they've got the bit about "adjusting for the impact of a bended shaft" but that doesn't help me figure out how they end up with 11.3* dynamic loft.


Posted

That's a typo.  Or the author just has no clue.  There's just no way the face of a 32˚ 6i is 11.3˚ of loft at impact in anything but the punchiest of punch shots.  No fancy math you're missing there.  Perhaps trackman adjusts for average shaft bend at impact given typical flex for a club swung at the seen speed, and that could change things by a couple degrees in addition to the 32˚ loft minus 3.4˚ AoA minus extra forward shaft lean, but what you quoted is just wrong and doesn't make sense.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Spin Loft = Dynamic Loft - Angle of Attack

Dynamic Loft = Spin Loft + Angle of Attack

Spin loft is determined by the loft of the club, and the dynamics of the shaft at impact. So its really tough to measure, but even if the hands are ahead of the ball at impact, theres no way that there turning a 32 degree club into an 12 degree club on a normal shot.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by mdl

That's a typo.  Or the author just has no clue.  There's just no way the face of a 32˚ 6i is 11.3˚ of loft at impact in anything but the punchiest of punch shots.  No fancy math you're missing there.  Perhaps trackman adjusts for average shaft bend at impact given typical flex for a club swung at the seen speed, and that could change things by a couple degrees in addition to the 32˚ loft minus 3.4˚ AoA minus extra forward shaft lean, but what you quoted is just wrong and doesn't make sense.

Thanks. That's kind of what I thought, but I figured since that's such a highly regarded blog, it must be correct. Glad to know I'm not THAT dumb...

Originally Posted by saevel25

Spin Loft = Dynamic Loft - Angle of Attack

Dynamic Loft = Spin Loft + Angle of Attack

Spin loft is determined by the loft of the club, and the dynamics of the shaft at impact. So its really tough to measure, but even if the hands are ahead of the ball at impact, theres no way that there turning a 32 degree club into an 12 degree club on a normal shot.

Yeah, didn't seem right to me. Thanks for the info.


  • Administrator
Posted

Average LAUNCH ANGLE for a 6-iron on the PGA Tour is north of 14°.

http://mytrackman.com/TrackMan.Online.DrivingRange/PGANumbers.html

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Not sure if this will help or hurt the conversation... But here is my 6i Trackman numbers from a golf clinic I attended in March.

I'm using an MP-59 6i 30-deg static loft - hitting off a lie board - outdoors on a range.

Trackman 6i Numbers.png

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by deronsizemore

That's exactly thought I thought it was calculated but reading this I'm not sure:

[quote]In the sample we are dealing with, the golfer is hitting a 6-iron which has about 32* of loft. The golfer had a -3.4* attack angle which is about the Tour average and likely had some forward shaft lean.

The result? It took that 6-iron loft and turned it into a 11.3* loft at impact.[/quote]

How do you take a 6 iron with 32* of loft with a -3.4 AOA and get a dynamic loft 11.3*? Like I wrote in my first post, they've got the bit about "adjusting for the impact of a bended shaft" but that doesn't help me figure out how they end up with 11.3* dynamic loft.

Also, your quote states 11.3* loft at impact.  That doesn't mean dynamic loft... I believe your quote is referring to Launch Angle.

Here is the calculation for Launch Angle (taken from Trackman website):

Driver.............. Launch Angle = (Dynamic Loft) + ((.85%) (Angle of Attack))

Irons............... Launch Angle = (Dynamic Loft) + ((.75%) (Angle of Attack))

So in your example, for a 6i of -3.4 AoA and 11.3* Launch Angle... The Dynamic Loft was actually.....

Dynamic Loft = (11.3) - ((.75%) (-3.4)) = 11.3 - (-2.55) = +13.85

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Beachcomber

Also, your quote states 11.3* loft at impact.  That doesn't mean dynamic loft... I believe your quote is referring to Launch Angle.

Here is the calculation for Launch Angle (taken from Trackman website):

Driver.............. Launch Angle = (Dynamic Loft) + ((.85%) (Angle of Attack))

Irons............... Launch Angle = (Dynamic Loft) + ((.75%) (Angle of Attack))

So in your example, for a 6i of -3.4 AoA and 11.3* Launch Angle... The Dynamic Loft was actually.....

Dynamic Loft = (11.3) - ((.75%) (-3.4)) = 11.3 - (-2.55) = +13.85

I get 16.2 quickly doing things, actually. 11.3 is 14.7 away from the AoA, and so the dynamic loft should be 19.6 away from the AoA, or 16.2 away from horizontal.

Plus I'm certain you didn't mean 0.75% or 0.85%.

But there's a lot more to it than that. 11.3 is still really low, though, so I don't know if we should waste time figuring out numbers that may be junk anyway.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Beachcomber

Also, your quote states 11.3* loft at impact.  That doesn't mean dynamic loft... I believe your quote is referring to Launch Angle.

Here is the calculation for Launch Angle (taken from Trackman website):

Driver.............. Launch Angle = (Dynamic Loft) + ((.85%) (Angle of Attack))

Irons............... Launch Angle = (Dynamic Loft) + ((.75%) (Angle of Attack))

So in your example, for a 6i of -3.4 AoA and 11.3* Launch Angle... The Dynamic Loft was actually.....

Dynamic Loft = (11.3) - ((.75%) (-3.4)) = 11.3 - (-2.55) = +13.85

Originally Posted by iacas

I get 16.2 quickly doing things, actually. 11.3 is 14.7 away from the AoA, and so the dynamic loft should be 19.6 away from the AoA, or 16.2 away from horizontal.

Plus I'm certain you didn't mean 0.75% or 0.85%.

But there's a lot more to it than that. 11.3 is still really low, though, so I don't know if we should waste time figuring out numbers that may be junk anyway.

Wait... maybe there is a typo (in the original article I linked too) here, but with the formula for how to calculate dynamic loft? According to Saevel25 earlier:

Spin Loft = Dynamic Loft - Angle of Attack

Dynamic Loft = Spin Loft + Angle of Attack

If you take that formula using the trackman numbers supplied at the top of the blog entry, it works out to 11.3 degrees of dynamic loft. In the article, he has "Static Loft + Attack Angle" where I think he meant "Spin Loft + Attack Angle?"

11.3 - -3.4 = 14.7 Spin Loft

14.7 + -3.4 = 11.3 Dynamic Loft

Correct?


  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by deronsizemore

If you take that formula using the trackman numbers supplied at the top of the blog entry, it works out to 11.3 degrees of dynamic loft. In the article, he has "Static Loft + Attack Angle" where I think he meant "Spin Loft + Attack Angle?"

Static loft is basically irrelevant in the middle of a swing, yes. :)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4977 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.