Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4819 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
After trying a bunch of different ones I use Maui Jim's for everything...driving (a car), running, tennis, fishing, working out, golf, etc...  I sweat a ton and they stay on without issues.  Their customer service is incredible as well.  This is my favorite pair after owning 3-4 different ones in the last decade: [URL=http://www.mauijim.com/ho-okipa-7032.html]http://www.mauijim.com/ho-okipa-7032.html[/URL]

Maui Jim makes some great glasses. I wear them for driving, cycling, and fishing, but they're all polarized, which, while great on the road and for water sports, I DON'T like for golf. Personal preference....

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I wear Numa sunglasses. I prefer non-polarized lenses due to slight distortion from the polarization. One pair of Numa glasses I wear has interchangeable lenses to allow for sunny or cloudy days. Super light and never slip even when sweaty.

Posted

Regardless of what model you pick, I'd suggest checking them out in person with how you look down at a golf ball.    Last summer, I was getting a case of the sh*nks and couldn't figure out why, and it turned out my sunglasses were making me see the ball in the wrong position.    With a proper golf stance, you're not looking straight out at the ball through the center of the lens, but are looking downward at an angle through the lower part of the lens.    I experimented and found that if I tipped the sunglasses in and out of my vision the apparent ball position changed by a good 1/2 inch or more!     And this was using some highly rated Tifosi golf sunglasses that have been well reviewed on this site.

You won't likely find any image distortion when looking straight out through the center of the lens, but looking at an angle through the lower part of the lens you may find this position distortion that I found.    I've seen this issue when trying on some Oakley's, Kaenon, and other highly regarded glasses.   I also saw that the amount of distortion varied when trying on different samples of the same model!   My normal Maui Jim driving sunglasses don't seem to have this problem, but their polarization makes green reading harder.


Posted
Originally Posted by Clambake

Regardless of what model you pick, I'd suggest checking them out in person with how you look down at a golf ball.    Last summer, I was getting a case of the sh*nks and couldn't figure out why, and it turned out my sunglasses were making me see the ball in the wrong position.    With a proper golf stance, you're not looking straight out at the ball through the center of the lens, but are looking downward at an angle through the lower part of the lens.    I experimented and found that if I tipped the sunglasses in and out of my vision the apparent ball position changed by a good 1/2 inch or more!     And this was using some highly rated Tifosi golf sunglasses that have been well reviewed on this site.

You won't likely find any image distortion when looking straight out through the center of the lens, but looking at an angle through the lower part of the lens you may find this position distortion that I found.    I've seen this issue when trying on some Oakley's, Kaenon, and other highly regarded glasses.   I also saw that the amount of distortion varied when trying on different samples of the same model!   My normal Maui Jim driving sunglasses don't seem to have this problem, but their polarization makes green reading harder.

I have had this exact same problem.  You have to be very careful to avoid lenses with so much curvature that they distort where the ball is.  Always set up to the ball and then lift your glasses and see if you are still staring at the ball.

I have two pairs that I wear right now.  One is a pair of Smiths and the other are Nike Forge with Golf specific lenses.  They are both very nice and help alot.   Still, I will lift them or take them off on the greens quite a bit.


Posted

Had many pairs of sunglasses, but rudy project is probably my favorite.  Wide range of frames/lenses......they make some quality cycling gear as well

I've beat the crap out of my 'suncreeks' the past few summers at the beach (and the rest of the year) and they have been pretty bulletproof, hinges are even still tight

Maybe a little pricier, but they often have deals.....

http://www.rudyprojectusa.com/sunglasses_landing.php?group_id=1


Posted

i have a black pair of oakley radars with smoke lenses and a pair of oakley jawbones in white with iridium lenses,the latter which i prefer to use for cycling..the radars are nice and simple and hang loose over they bridge,secure enough to stay on but there rimless on the lower half of the the lense so its like your not wearing anything..i feel less pressure on my face and temples with these to.


Posted

1) Lens quality

2) Almost equally important is the fit. Make sure the frame fits you. Make sure the bottom edge of the lens isn't too short at address to where it interferes with line of sight with the ball.

3) Polarized lenses can interfere with reading greens. It takes the glare off the grass but sometimes that is a visual clue to grain and slope.

R11s driver

R11 3 wood

Glide sole design 5 wood

Cleveland CG16 irons

Vokey SM4 48*, Vokey SM4 52*, Vokey SM4 56* wedges

Yes! Eleanor putter


Note: This thread is 4819 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.