Jump to content
IGNORED

Steel vs. Graphite

Wizardvette
 Share
Note: This thread is 6905 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Wizardvette Member

Wizardvette

I got a decent deal on a set of 3 & 5 Nike fairway woods with steel shafts. They will be replacing some "beginner" clubs with graphite shafts. Are there any pro's or cons to steel shafted woods? Will it drastically affect my swing? TIA.
In my Arsenal.
Driver: R580 9.5°
Irons: Nike CPR Steel 5-PW
Woods:
Nike T40 3 Fairway Nike T40 5 Fairway Hybrids: Nike CPR 22° Nike CPR 26° UST Irod ShaftSW: Nike 55°Forged Chrome SeriesPutter: Nike Blue Chip putterBalls: Nike One or Callaway Warbirds******************
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PGAfan790 Established Member

PGAfan790

Well i guess it depends on what feel you want from your club.

I have graphite woods, driver, and hybrid and then i have steel irons. Some of these other guys and gals can probably give you good specific info.

Mike Fisher
email me PGAfan790@aol.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lightrider Member

lightrider

I got a decent deal on a set of 3 & 5 Nike fairway woods with steel shafts. They will be replacing some "beginner" clubs with graphite shafts. Are there any pro's or cons to steel shafted woods? Will it drastically affect my swing? TIA.

Shaft determination is dependant upon alot of factors. The first is whether you swing is consistent enough to have repeatable results. Next your swing speed to flex and then its what you are wanting to do in terms of ball flight. Some shaft will help you carry the ball farther while other will go low and roll. Most people will play steel in a FW for control rather than distance.

Golfwrx.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wizardvette Member

Wizardvette

  • Author
Thanks guys. Control is what I'm aiming for, so steel was the better choice. Plus, the price...I got both for $150. They look as though they never even hit a ball.
In my Arsenal.
Driver: R580 9.5°
Irons: Nike CPR Steel 5-PW
Woods:
Nike T40 3 Fairway Nike T40 5 Fairway Hybrids: Nike CPR 22° Nike CPR 26° UST Irod ShaftSW: Nike 55°Forged Chrome SeriesPutter: Nike Blue Chip putterBalls: Nike One or Callaway Warbirds******************
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rafcin Great Member

Rafcin

...Are there any pro's or cons to steel shafted woods? ...

The biggest difference for me is the swingweight. Unless you're talking about some high-tech royal precision projectX or something like that, the steel shafts is heavier. Heavier club causes slower swing speed. It also changes the feel of the club by distributing the weight differently. I don't belive in the less control argument about graphite material. With today's technology, puring etc. I doubt there is so much difference, that weekend players will even realize it.

For me is pretty much - try one, try another - stick with whatever works / feels good, regardless of "what THE Book says"
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1

Putt4doh Member

Putt4doh

I'm with you Rafcin...the biggest difference I've found between steel and graphic is weight and to a lesser degree ball flight. With today's technology in graphite, they can build a shaft to do whatever you need it to...

That being said, play whatever feels better without sacrificing distance or accuracy.

What's in My Bag?

Driver: Taylor Made 510TP 8.5 w/proto Aldila NV 65X
Wood: PT 15 bore thru, X100
Hybrid: 503H, 19 deg, S300Irons: 680, 3-PW, Freq. Matched X100Wedges: Black Nickel Vokey 54.10, 60.08Putter: Scotty Cameron Newport Oil CanBall: ProV1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tsukihime Member

Tsukihime

The biggest difference for me is the swingweight. Unless you're talking about some high-tech royal precision projectX or something like that, the steel shafts is heavier. Heavier club causes slower swing speed. It also changes the feel of the club by distributing the weight differently. I don't belive in the less control argument about graphite material. With today's technology, puring etc. I doubt there is so much difference, that weekend players will even realize it.

Actually the difference is there , someone who has a swing speed of , lets say 105 with steel shaft , if he decides to switch from steel to graphite , the speed could change from like 105 , to 125 or more , so there is no way that , this player would be able to keep control of the club at that speed , theres a good chance that he will top the ball or slice it , since his swing is way too fast and the a good chance that when it comes to like irons 7-pw

since his swing speed is so fast that he will break the club , since graphite isnt as solid as steel , Graphite is made for people who have slow swings ,(usually Kids or Senior) so a person swigning at 75 with steel , by using graphite hes able increase his swing speed to match the other guy who swings at 105 with steel . So no , you dont hit less longer if you have graphite , its just a way for weaker people or people with slow swings to hit harder without having all the steel weight.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lightrider Member

lightrider

Actually the difference is there , someone who has a swing speed of , lets say 105 with steel shaft , if he decides to switch from steel to graphite , the speed could change from like 105 , to 125 or more , so there is no way that , this player would be able to keep control of the club at that speed , theres a good chance that he will top the ball or slice it , since his swing is way too fast and the a good chance that when it comes to like irons 7-pw

I honestly never heard of someone swinging so fast that it broke a shaft. 99% of the time its because of improper installation or poor striking. I also haven't seen a tremendous speed bump from steel to graphite shafts in swing speed difference. I have swung a 110 gram shaft and went down to 80 and my swing speed didn't vary that much. Also graphite shafts are made for all players now. They aren't my personal favorite shaft for irons but, there are a few that are made that will play just the same as steel. The only difference would be feel.

Golfwrx.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tsukihime Member

Tsukihime

I honestly never heard of someone swinging so fast that it broke a shaft. 99% of the time its because of improper installation or poor striking. I also haven't seen a tremendous speed bump from steel to graphite shafts in swing speed difference. I have swung a 110 gram shaft and went down to 80 and my swing speed didn't vary that much. Also graphite shafts are made for all players now. They aren't my personal favorite shaft for irons but, there are a few that are made that will play just the same as steel. The only difference would be feel.

Yeah sure i mean it depends what kind of hitter you are , im am considered a big hitter , 110+mph , so when it comes to irons like , 9 iron , when you have to get under the ball and you hit some dirt its hard on the shaft , and after a while there is a greater risk of breaking , actually i broke 2 irons like that (with graphite shaft) , not on the first shot off course , but after 5-6 rounds ,

but anyway i am not a graphite guy either , my swing get way too fast and im just not comfortable , cause im not able to control the club properly .
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lightrider Member

lightrider

Yeah sure i mean it depends what kind of hitter you are , im am considered a big hitter , 110+mph , so when it comes to irons like , 9 iron , when you have to get under the ball and you hit some dirt its hard on the shaft , and after a while there is a greater risk of breaking , actually i broke 2 irons like that (with graphite shaft) , not on the first shot off course , but after 5-6 rounds ,

Man, you must play on some hard dirt. What about PGA players that use graphite, like KJ Choi, does he change shaft every couple of rounds??? I don't hear Tiger or Hank Kuehne breaking driver shafts that often either.

Golfwrx.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everardo Great Member

Everardo

WOW! I know Canadian beer is stronger but a gain of 20 mph from Steel to Graphite...even 20 KPH is stretching it!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1

Tsukihime Member

Tsukihime

Man, you must play on some hard dirt. What about PGA players that use graphite, like KJ Choi, does he change shaft every couple of rounds??? I don't hear Tiger or Hank Kuehne breaking driver shafts that often either.

Im not talking about drivers , i do have graphite on my driver , everyone does , im taking about irons , mostly 7 to pw , those irons who needs to go under the ball for high velocity , i broke a 9 iron and a pitch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 6905 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up

  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.

  • Posts

    • StuM
      My Swing (StuM)

      By StuM ·

      Please forgive the sweaty shirt.  Just got off the treadmill and decided to do my Evolvr drill.  
    • klineka
      My Swing (billchao)

      By klineka ·

      I'd agree that 4w seems like the right play here. I'm not a course designer or anything but that hole looks like it could be so much more fun if everyone played from those front 2 tee boxes that are right outside your shot cone and they cut down most of the trees down that left side of the fairway. That would give risk reward to long hitters who want to try and push it up to that left fairway, allow more players to reach that second fairway, and still allowing it to be perfectly playable for someone who only hits driver like 150yds off the tee.   Yeah it looks like 4iron aimed at that inside edge of the right bunker is the play there, especially if you don't expect a 20mph tailwind again. If it is down wind again, 5iron would be just fine too, it'd still get you inside 150yds for your approach.  Keep in mind tee marker locations too, you measured that one from the back so if those tee markers are moved all the way towards the front of that box then 5 iron is probably best just to be sure that right bunker is never in play. 
    • StuM
      "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge

      By StuM ·

      Day 1: worked on my drill for my arms.
    • billchao
      Best Shot of the Week

      By billchao ·

      Hit my tee shot just into the penalty area and barely found it. Swung hard just in case I hit it. It was slightly downhill with a heavy tailwind. I don't actually hit my 9i 170 yards.
    • billchao
      My Swing (billchao)

      By billchao ·

      Right. The difference between being 120 out and 70 out for me (this is the important part) is negligible and not worth putting other risks into play off the tee.   Ok the argument against driver is that my shot cone is comically large. It puts every possible outcome into play. You can't see the green from the tee so there's a good chance I'd have to wait for it to clear which would slow down play. That's the third tee right in the middle of the firing range there. I really don't want to wait just to hit a terrible shot and I especially don't want to injure somebody. Yea I have no problem playing out of the rough short of the bunker if I'm just going to lay up short of the bunker, but I absolutely need to avoid flaring it right into the penalty area if I'm going to be laying up in the first place. As a general strategy I understand where you're coming from. But since we're specifically talking about me (this is a shot I'm going to have to hit on Saturday), I think the cost is fairly marginal. I hit the ball 8' closer on average from 50-100 than I do from 100-150 from the fairway and rough and the green success % difference is 4%. Bunker might as well be a penalty drop. Based on the data,  Here's my SG:A data compared to a 10: I honestly don't know how to use SG for decision making. That's why I was mostly looking at proximity to hole and green success rate for comparison. I mostly use SG as a way to track my progress. All good. Like I said, I appreciate the discussion. It makes me think. If I didn't want to see alternative/opposing viewpoints to my own I just wouldn't post anything. You should post it! In your own swing thread, of course. It's been a fun exercise.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

  I accept
The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...