Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7268 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I got a decent deal on a set of 3 & 5 Nike fairway woods with steel shafts. They will be replacing some "beginner" clubs with graphite shafts. Are there any pro's or cons to steel shafted woods? Will it drastically affect my swing? TIA.
In my Arsenal.
Driver: R580 9.5°
Irons: Nike CPR Steel 5-PW
Woods:
Nike T40 3 Fairway Nike T40 5 Fairway Hybrids: Nike CPR 22° Nike CPR 26° UST Irod ShaftSW: Nike 55°Forged Chrome SeriesPutter: Nike Blue Chip putterBalls: Nike One or Callaway Warbirds
******************

Well i guess it depends on what feel you want from your club.

I have graphite woods, driver, and hybrid and then i have steel irons. Some of these other guys and gals can probably give you good specific info.

Mike Fisher
email me PGAfan790@aol.com


  Wizardvette said:
I got a decent deal on a set of 3 & 5 Nike fairway woods with steel shafts. They will be replacing some "beginner" clubs with graphite shafts. Are there any pro's or cons to steel shafted woods? Will it drastically affect my swing? TIA.

Shaft determination is dependant upon alot of factors. The first is whether you swing is consistent enough to have repeatable results. Next your swing speed to flex and then its what you are wanting to do in terms of ball flight. Some shaft will help you carry the ball farther while other will go low and roll. Most people will play steel in a FW for control rather than distance.

Golfwrx.com


Thanks guys. Control is what I'm aiming for, so steel was the better choice. Plus, the price...I got both for $150. They look as though they never even hit a ball.
In my Arsenal.
Driver: R580 9.5°
Irons: Nike CPR Steel 5-PW
Woods:
Nike T40 3 Fairway Nike T40 5 Fairway Hybrids: Nike CPR 22° Nike CPR 26° UST Irod ShaftSW: Nike 55°Forged Chrome SeriesPutter: Nike Blue Chip putterBalls: Nike One or Callaway Warbirds
******************

  Wizardvette said:
...Are there any pro's or cons to steel shafted woods? ...

The biggest difference for me is the swingweight. Unless you're talking about some high-tech royal precision projectX or something like that, the steel shafts is heavier. Heavier club causes slower swing speed. It also changes the feel of the club by distributing the weight differently. I don't belive in the less control argument about graphite material. With today's technology, puring etc. I doubt there is so much difference, that weekend players will even realize it.

For me is pretty much - try one, try another - stick with whatever works / feels good, regardless of "what THE Book says"
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm with you Rafcin...the biggest difference I've found between steel and graphic is weight and to a lesser degree ball flight. With today's technology in graphite, they can build a shaft to do whatever you need it to...

That being said, play whatever feels better without sacrificing distance or accuracy.

What's in My Bag?

Driver: Taylor Made 510TP 8.5 w/proto Aldila NV 65X
Wood: PT 15 bore thru, X100
Hybrid: 503H, 19 deg, S300Irons: 680, 3-PW, Freq. Matched X100Wedges: Black Nickel Vokey 54.10, 60.08Putter: Scotty Cameron Newport Oil CanBall: ProV1x


whatever helps you create the best repeatable swing whether it's steel or graphite that's what you should use. That's a simple answer.

  Rafcin said:
The biggest difference for me is the swingweight. Unless you're talking about some high-tech royal precision projectX or something like that, the steel shafts is heavier. Heavier club causes slower swing speed. It also changes the feel of the club by distributing the weight differently. I don't belive in the less control argument about graphite material. With today's technology, puring etc. I doubt there is so much difference, that weekend players will even realize it.

Actually the difference is there , someone who has a swing speed of , lets say 105 with steel shaft , if he decides to switch from steel to graphite , the speed could change from like 105 , to 125 or more , so there is no way that , this player would be able to keep control of the club at that speed , theres a good chance that he will top the ball or slice it , since his swing is way too fast and the a good chance that when it comes to like irons 7-pw

since his swing speed is so fast that he will break the club , since graphite isnt as solid as steel , Graphite is made for people who have slow swings ,(usually Kids or Senior) so a person swigning at 75 with steel , by using graphite hes able increase his swing speed to match the other guy who swings at 105 with steel . So no , you dont hit less longer if you have graphite , its just a way for weaker people or people with slow swings to hit harder without having all the steel weight.

  Tsukihime said:
Actually the difference is there , someone who has a swing speed of , lets say 105 with steel shaft , if he decides to switch from steel to graphite , the speed could change from like 105 , to 125 or more , so there is no way that , this player would be able to keep control of the club at that speed , theres a good chance that he will top the ball or slice it , since his swing is way too fast and the a good chance that when it comes to like irons 7-pw

I honestly never heard of someone swinging so fast that it broke a shaft. 99% of the time its because of improper installation or poor striking. I also haven't seen a tremendous speed bump from steel to graphite shafts in swing speed difference. I have swung a 110 gram shaft and went down to 80 and my swing speed didn't vary that much. Also graphite shafts are made for all players now. They aren't my personal favorite shaft for irons but, there are a few that are made that will play just the same as steel. The only difference would be feel.

Golfwrx.com


  lightrider said:
I honestly never heard of someone swinging so fast that it broke a shaft. 99% of the time its because of improper installation or poor striking. I also haven't seen a tremendous speed bump from steel to graphite shafts in swing speed difference. I have swung a 110 gram shaft and went down to 80 and my swing speed didn't vary that much. Also graphite shafts are made for all players now. They aren't my personal favorite shaft for irons but, there are a few that are made that will play just the same as steel. The only difference would be feel.

Yeah sure i mean it depends what kind of hitter you are , im am considered a big hitter , 110+mph , so when it comes to irons like , 9 iron , when you have to get under the ball and you hit some dirt its hard on the shaft , and after a while there is a greater risk of breaking , actually i broke 2 irons like that (with graphite shaft) , not on the first shot off course , but after 5-6 rounds ,

but anyway i am not a graphite guy either , my swing get way too fast and im just not comfortable , cause im not able to control the club properly .

  Tsukihime said:
Yeah sure i mean it depends what kind of hitter you are , im am considered a big hitter , 110+mph , so when it comes to irons like , 9 iron , when you have to get under the ball and you hit some dirt its hard on the shaft , and after a while there is a greater risk of breaking , actually i broke 2 irons like that (with graphite shaft) , not on the first shot off course , but after 5-6 rounds ,

Man, you must play on some hard dirt. What about PGA players that use graphite, like KJ Choi, does he change shaft every couple of rounds??? I don't hear Tiger or Hank Kuehne breaking driver shafts that often either.

Golfwrx.com


WOW! I know Canadian beer is stronger but a gain of 20 mph from Steel to Graphite...even 20 KPH is stretching it!
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  lightrider said:
Man, you must play on some hard dirt. What about PGA players that use graphite, like KJ Choi, does he change shaft every couple of rounds??? I don't hear Tiger or Hank Kuehne breaking driver shafts that often either.

Im not talking about drivers , i do have graphite on my driver , everyone does , im taking about irons , mostly 7 to pw , those irons who needs to go under the ball for high velocity , i broke a 9 iron and a pitch


Note: This thread is 7268 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 197 - 2025-04-15 Played 18 holes at Yeaman's Hall Club.
    • Day 13 (15 Apr 25)- late afternoon session with 6i full swings into the net and short pitches in the yard, before moving to Sw for controlled up and downs.  For kicks broke out the DCI 16° 1 iron and hit a few as into the net.  Definitely different beast. 
    • Day 24: Tax Day Stack Training Session for Full Speed Spectrum. Good session!
    • Very respectfully, I disagree.  I still believe there’s a small kernel of truth to my theory.  Hey, you, iacas and many others here are extremely knowledgeable, know the game inside out, know the tour inside out.  I’m just a schmuck who posted a take, admittedly unsupported and not up to reasonable high standards. There’s a background to my take - I’ll attempt to briefly describe it.  Back when Rory first came on tour, I thought he was great - most folks did, his talent was undeniable, and his youthful happy go lucky looking demeanor made him even more likable.  And he won early, fast - at the highest levels. And then the physical workouts started.  That was cool, man he’s looking good.  And as it went along, was even a bit shocking.  But all was still good in the Rory fan club. But as a few years rolled along and the majors stopped, folks like me started to question the effect of the physical build up.  (raising my hand here - - folks like me were probably concentrating 95% on the majors record, and failing to acknowledge his stellar play overall) The matches with Patrick Reed...  Somewhere around that time, Patrick became “the most hated man on tour”.  Raising my hand again, not sure if that timing is accurate, or even if that moniker was deserved.  But when Rory got into the screaming flex-off, it definitely detracted from the earlier Rory likability.  It’s kinda like he was lowering himself to Patrick’s level.  Not so great, for me at least. As the mid 2010s rolled along, and the majors drought continued, and the near misses at the Masters happened, the dreaded ‘choke’ perception inevitably raised its head and persisted.  I joined in with the chorus, not disliking Rory, but certainly questioning his ability to close the Masters or any other major.  Rightfully or wrongly, it was there. Then LIV came along.  As that developed, I saw the anti-LIV sentiment develop along with it, and I took offense to it.  My thought - these guys are being offered life changing $$, and the anti-LIV folks are trying to stop them from getting it. And then when Rory rose to ‘lead’ the anti-LIV sector, that really rubbed me the wrong way.  The press conferences, the parking lot shouting match - it just all seemed really distasteful to me.  And it seemed far far away from the early Rory, who I really liked. So all that (in my own mind) led me down the “Rory will never win.. yada yada”.  Not based on any real statistical analysis.  Not taking into account the incredible stats and winning record he had amassed. Purely based on perception and cultural silliness.  AND - the physical thing, which as I mentioned, I think there’s a tiny kernel of merit there. So - fast forward to Rory’s post win press conference.  THAT was the old Rory I remembered!  The totally cool guy, humble, forthright, honest, self deprecating.  He’s probably been like that all along.  And he’s certainly backed off the hard core anti-LIV persona, at least in public. That’s it.  Just a stupid unsupported take from a dumbsh*t golf fan.  For me, this was the most exciting major since the Tiger era. I really thought it would be a gladiator death match between Rory and Bryson.  I’m surprised that Bryson fell off - - I thought he was well-set-up to handle the pressure.  I’m sure he’ll be there many times in the future, along with Rory.
    • I've been watching golf for 35 years and I've seen my fair share of exciting events, but I cannot recall ever watching so much up and down in the fortunes of one player in one round of golf. How good the good shots were and how bad the bad shots were and how he was leading, then not, then leading again, then way clear, then tied, then behind, then leading, then in a playoff, then winning. Heck I aged just watching it on the TV - Rory must have gone through some stuff out there. Just incredible. Consider that Rory had two double bogeys, three bogeys, six birdies, and Rose made only 4 pars, 4 bogeys, and 10 birdies. 10! Round that place? Mind officially blown.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...