Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
looperboss

Technasonic Check-Go Use

4 posts in this topic

After water balancing my golf balls for several years, I decided to purchase a Check-Go Pro. I compared 3 dozen golf balls that had been previously water balanced and found that the equilibrium point found by the Check-Go (top of the ball in the unit) was very close to the equator found by water balancing- 90 degrees off where Technasonic states that the "heavy" side of the ball would be (along the equator found when spinning the unit). This was found to be the case in 33 of the 36 golf balls I tested.

After thinking about this, it occurred to me that the heavy side of the ball would tend to gravitate to the top or bottom of the axis while spinning in the unit rather than the equator, otherwise would the ball not wobble while spinning in the unit? I would think that in order to reach equilibrium that the heavy side of the ball would need to be found on the axis rather than the equator.

Anyone's thoughts?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I once did what you did above - it's apparent I took the game too seriously at one time. My game did not rate that consideration.

At the same time, I think golf ball quality standards are improved from 10 years ago...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by looperboss

After thinking about this, it occurred to me that the heavy side of the ball would tend to gravitate to the top or bottom of the axis while spinning in the unit rather than the equator, otherwise would the ball not wobble while spinning in the unit? I would think that in order to reach equilibrium that the heavy side of the ball would need to be found on the axis rather than the equator.

Anyone's thoughts?

I don't know anything about water balancing but I've spun quite a few balls up in my "Check-n-go"  These things are often gifts for the golfer who has everything and my wife and daughters ran out of golf stuff to buy for Father's Day, birthday, and Christmas.

I got into using it for a while after I bought some really cheap balls that were "house" brand at Golfsmith.  By cheap I mean 24 or 30 (I dont' remember) balls for about $10. My game was in terrible shape and I decided that it didn't matter what ball I used. The only part of my game that didn't suck before I bought the balls was putting.

Then I started noticing that my putts were taking unexpected breaks around the hole. Like a downhill right to left that gets 6 inches from the hole and turns back right. After seeing this more than any golfer should see in a lifetime, I dusted off the "Check-n-go"  My intention was to spin the balls and mark the equator as an alignment aid. I marked a few and went to the practice green a couple of times. I putted fairly well with the alignment aid but I found the line around the ball to be a distraction because I was always worried that I lined the ball up wrong.

I re-read the box and the instructions and realized that if a ball was out of balance as much as they said they could be, who knows how true they would roll the last half of the putt. I also noticed that when I would spin the balls, that some of the balls took a long time to settle down in the machine.

Since centrifugal force is going to make the heavy side rotate around the equator, I reasoned that if this thing really works then I should be able to spin one and mark it, then turn it upside down and place a second mark 180 degrees opposite of the first mark and a line intersecting both dots should be perpendicular to the line marking the equator. Worked every time.

I mentioned that some of the balls took longer to settle down in the machine....what I mean by that is some balls would have a violent wobble when starting up and others would spin up very smooth and reach max speed quickly.

I've looked at 4 ball types, the above mentioned cheap store brand, Titleist ProV1 (I love 'em), Noodles, and Taylormade Pentas.  The difference as far as "Check-n-go" is concerned is that the cheaper balls took longer to spin up.  To me this would indicate that cheaper balls are more likely to be out of balance or out or round.

To double back on the putting problem that got me started on this experiment, I took brand new unmarked cheap balls and brand new unmarked ProV1s to the practice green and the cheap balls behaved exactly as I'd expected with more lip outs, more odd breaks at the end of the putt, and less putts holed when compared to the Pro V1s on the same greeen, same day, same line, same conditions, same everything.

I

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As an aside to the usefulness of water balancing a golf ball, Ralph Maltby has a putting demonstration video that shows the results of having the ball balanced. I have also caddied for several years and have seen what appears (no way to be able to tell with certainty that this is the case) to be the effect of having the "heavy" side of the ball favoring one side of the ball or the other rather than the equator (line upon which the ball ball rolls) on a putt. The result is that when the ball starts to die, it will veer dramatically toward the heavy side depending on how much off balance the ball is and how much the center of gravity of the ball is off the equator. I have seen putts that are just outside the hole staying straight, sometimes even seemingly breaking uphill. The quality of the read is tested by putting the same line a few more times and getting different results, human error notwithstanding.

Comparing the spinning of the golf ball to wheel spin balancing is not a true comparison as mentioned on the Check-Go marketing material. Spin balancing a wheel takes place in two dimensions (plane) while golf ball spin balancing takes place in 3 dimensions. If the center of gravity is free to move in 3 dimensions as with the Check-Go, the ball can only reach rotational equilibrium by forcing the center of gravity to the axis of the spin rather than forcing it to the equator.

I presume that when players consistently use a spun golf ball as recommended, they will get consistent results so having the heavy side of the ball to one side or the other will not make a huge difference to a recreational golfer using the markings as directed in the unit's instruction manual.

I have yet to test putt balls to compare Check-Go vs. water balancing so stay tuned...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • That was really cool. I wish I had been out there to watch it live. 
    • When the courses open for the year around here (North Dakota), I try to get out and do something everyday.  Whether it be chipping and putting for an hour, range session, or get a quick 9 holes in I try to do something daily.  Not sure if that qualifies as "playing" daily.
    • (Feel free to move if this isn't an appropriate location) I purchased a SkyTrak launch monitor, and I have been very pleased with the product thus far. I feel that my review/experiences over the past few years may be able to help some or create good discussion on practicing. I don't have practice facilities readily accessible (25 min drive), so I've spent countless hours refining my swing in my garage with a mat/net.  3 years ago I was a 12 hcp and often struggled to make consistent solid contact, but have since lowered my hcp to the 4-6 range. It took a little while to learn the "feel" of different hits/misses while hitting into a net, but I was soon able to identify many different misses (fat, thin, toe, big slice, duck hook, etc) as well as a relatively solid hit.  It was easy to make improvements to my swing, because the difference between my "better" shots and my "worse" shots was easy to determine.   As I continued to improve my ball striking on the mat, I saw positive (although somewhat delayed) results on the course.  Last year, I had finally eliminated the majority of major mis-hits, and my "worse" shots turned into smaller draws and slices as well as small errors in distance control and starting flight path. I found that my mat/net practice sessions mostly consisted of solid feeling hits that went in the general vicinity of my target.  I was no longer getting specific enough feedback to further hone my ball striking.  I would spend a full week practicing what felt great at home, but when I took it to the course, I realized that I actually had a mild-moderate slice/draw that I wasn't aware of.  Basically, it was like hitting an 8 iron and knowing that my ball likely landed somewhere on the green or fringe, but, but not knowing if it was left, right, short, or long. I spent more time going to the range and hitting the course, but my schedule just doesn't allow me to go more than once or twice per week.  My improvement plateaued.   I did some research, and ultimately settled on the $2k SkyTrak instead of the variety of different options.  I considered the Optishot2 and GC2 based on other reviews, but ultimately settled with an in-between.   It was easy to setup, and after 5 minutes of experimenting with different ball positions, I've found it to be very accurate and consistent to the best that I can tell.  I can't attest to the accuracy of the more specific measurements (spin, launch angle, club head speed, etc), but what I "feel" seems to be very consistent with what I see.  The only thing that doesn't "feel" like what I see, is that my stock standard "good" feeling shot has a decent draw to it instead of being straight (remember my problem above?).  Adjusting my baseline "feel" to what is reality, any shots that feel like a draw actually show up as a bigger draw, and what feels like a fade is actually a straight shot.   I can consistently judge a fade, draw, flighted, flop, and my carry to within ~5 yards after I strike the ball.  It truly feels like I'm hitting on the range but with more specific information at my disposal (carry, launch angle, max height, spin).  Even if the numbers aren't perfectly accurate, they seem to be accurate relative to other shots within the same launch monitor (aka spin numbers increase and decrease as would be expected based on swing/club, even if I can't confirm their overall accuracy). I have no clue if SkyTrak was the best bang-for-buck, or if there are better products out there.  I also haven't been able to take it outdoors to confirm flight patterns.  It seems like a very poor setup for anyone wanting to take it to the range - indoor mat/net setup is its niche from my understanding.   I'm only a week in to using it, so my feeling may change over time, but I thought I would share my experience and offer to answer any questions if anyone has them.  Happy golfing!
    • So, I have another lesson on saturday but I've been working hard maintaining my posture during the swing. Over the last few months i developed a trend where on the down swing i would lean my left shoulder toward the ball and my right shoulder would come under and 4 times out of 5 i hit the ball fat. Yesterday's range session showed tremendous improvement, and i was back to hitting good shots again. Now that I have this down, I think it's time for another lesson so I can work on whatever he tells me next. Also, I bought a nike blades 4 iron for fun because I've always liked the look of blades but don't have the balls to actually play them, and I was shocked at how much distance I got, even on mishits. I was even more surprised when I put it on a tee and was hitting the ball almost as far as my 3 wood... just a lot more accurate. Can anyone say Beginners Luck? I think the true cause for this is actually the loft of the 4 iron. The one i have now(Cobra King Forged TEC), has so little loft it feels like i'm attempting to hit driver off the deck and is super tough to hit.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. henry granic
      henry granic
      (61 years old)
    2. Jscrillah
      Jscrillah
      (45 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon