Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

New member here from New Hampshire USA

2 posts in this topic

Hi everyone. My name is Ray and I just discovered this golf community, looked great so I joined right away! I'm middle age but just started golfing last July (2012) so I'm NEW and I'm not that good ;-) but I'm loving it. I bought a complete beginners set of Walter Hagen clubs and have been getting good use out of them since last July. Right now it's literally 2 degrees outside and the ground is snow covered but I'm golfing almost everyday thanks to high enough ceilings in my basement to swing my irons and an Optishot home simulator. (recomended for stuck in cold climates golfers) I can't full swing my drivers so i'm playing everything par 3.  It's not real golf but it shows me what my swing is doing so it's way better than hitting into a net because i'm getting good feedback ... and it's fun!

ANYWAY I work 3rd shift so I'll be visiting the forum a lot from my office during the weekdays so you'll be seening a lot of me. And i'll have a TON of questions.

I have NO IDEA what my handicap is because I'm new to the game, Someday I'd LOVE to know what it is.

So that's my story, i'm happy to have found this forum and i look forward to getting to (cyber) know you all!



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Thanks ... looks like a great forum! Glad to be a part of it.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • No doubt any computer in the last 20 years at least has the processing power, it's more the logistics of it. We'd need all new voting machines, or secure online voting (which I might be in favor of). All of the votes would need to get entered into a huge database with much more chance for error on different levels, plus you could have bugs, etc.  Right now, because our vote-counting is so granular, any technical issues are generally localized to particular precincts. Any glitches in a nationwide count would have much larger implications.  So, while possible, I still think it would be a pretty big challenge to make sure it goes off without a major hitch. We all know how well the government does with websites and technology 
    • I think the hole size is fair and does not need to be changed.  Also, how many millions of rounds have been played with the current size hole?    To me it is like the narrow definition of "hazard" - I don't like it but it has been the rule since the R&A created them.. it would be like allowing 4 strikes for an out in baseball.
    • Agree, and we have strayed pretty far from the original system of stronger state governments. They control their own fates in congress, so it makes sense to me that popular vote should control the presidency. I would even support that for party nominations. 
    • Thankfully they didn't play that song. 
    • I didn't vote (yet). I suspect that if the hole had always been some other specific size (e.g., 2x, 3x, 4x ball diameter; or 4 inches, 6 inches, etc.) I probably would have considered that to be correct and wouldn't give it a second thought, unless someone else had a different standard--like the standardizing of golf ball size a few decades ago.   I also suspect that if there were no standard hole size, I would have considered that to be correct. After all, greens are all different sizes, configurations, and we consider that part of the game. Probably would be reflected in the slope/rating.   Imagine: "What do you think of Rory's putt coming up here, Roger?" "I don't know, Jim: He's got a short putt here for birdie, but on this green they used a 3 inch hole today. Not like the fourth hole where they gave them a 6 inch target--that was easier despite the way the green tilts toward the creek.   And not like Oakmont last week, where they went with 5 inch holes on all 18 greens on Sunday to give the guys a lot more birdie opportunities." So I suppose my answer is "No, because if it were larger or smaller, we would adjust--our scores (everyone's) would be lower or higher-- it would just be a "new normal."
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 17hoffmanc
      (18 years old)
    2. jamo
      (24 years old)
  • Blog Entries