Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5293 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am looking for input and feedback about an evolving idea. I hate the idea of buying some brand new snazzy irons, to go along with my (what is becoming) snazzy set of clubs.

What is your guys expirience with buying old clubs, reshafting, and gripping... essentially just keeping the ol' beatin up head.

I am thinking about going for the copper heads.. I think it would be classy and timeless...

any input appreciated?

In my Matrix XTT bag,
on my Sun Mountain Speed Cart
LD M-Speed 10.5* Driver
V18 full set of starter clubs
3W, 3iw, 4iw, 5-S Irons and Wedges Kirk Currie KC4 PutterHome Course:Pajaro Valley Golf Clubwww.pajarovalleygolf.com


Posted
I had a great set of the Copper Eye 2's. You can also get the heads polished and tumbled and they will look amazing.

Here are the keys...

1. make sure you get the square groove model, not the plus (+) model. They will hold their value and are better clubs.

2. get your fitting done and find out what color you are...however, the black dots retain value better.

3. make sure you find the lowest serial number possible. You can call Ping and they will tell you when the club was made and the specs on the set.

Driver: 9.5 905R 757 Speeder X stiff
3 Wood: 13.0 Sonartec GS Tour Red Ice 70X
Hybrid: 17.0 Sonartec MD Stiff UST IROD
Irons: 690cb 4-PW w/Rifle 6.0
Wedges: Cleveland 900 Series Gunmetal 50, 54, 60Putter: Scotty Cameron Studio Newport 370g head


Posted
Thanks for the feedback. I don't really care about value, I just want a kinda classy set. Know what I mean? Something that looks cool, and is functional.

Square grooves and black dot (that is my fit) are the specs I am looking for.

In my Matrix XTT bag,
on my Sun Mountain Speed Cart
LD M-Speed 10.5* Driver
V18 full set of starter clubs
3W, 3iw, 4iw, 5-S Irons and Wedges Kirk Currie KC4 PutterHome Course:Pajaro Valley Golf Clubwww.pajarovalleygolf.com


Posted
I primarily play Ping Eye2+ irons with a 1994 build date (when I feel like torturing myself, I play the irons in my avatar). I'll give you the Cliffs Notes version of information available via ebay's buyers' guide and pinggolf.com's knowledge base...along with personal experience from reading, calling Ping's customer service, and with dealing with clubfitters and having conversations with fellow Eye2 owners (friends, playing partners & other owners I've met).

Eye2+ irons built after 1990 can be bent up to 2 degrees. Good clubfitters that know Ping Eye2s understand this factoid about the build date "bendability" differences, but most likely will still make you sign a waiver (a liability waiver for adjusting old clubs is usually standard protocol for clubfitters anyhow). So, what this means is that when you're shopping for a set in the best shape possible, you can widen your options and look for color codes that can be bent to your specs. And maybe the blue dot on the irons you're bending to black-dot specs better matches your bag, headcovers...shirt...or (pun intended) eyes?

For example, mine are black dots bent to blue specs. And I bent the PW to 47.5. Mine will never be sold, so I'm not hurting or misleading any future owners. Not that I ever would anyhow, but I'm sure you get the idea of this "forewarning".

Bendability is a huge advantage with the later + models in case someone slips growth hormone in your nightly martini and you go from 5'9" to 6 feet in height in a matter of months...or (more realistically) you get a proper, professional fitting and/or lesson resulting in a swing change. According to Ping's website and knowledge base, the Eye2s built before 1990 cannot be bent (adjusted for loft and lie) whatsoever. The + models also have less bounce and slightly stronger lofts. Rather than argue what Ping Eye2 version is "better" (which is silly), these comments of mine on bendability, bounce and loft are points to consider if you're putting yours into play rather than into a display case or flipping them for a profit.

The original KT shafts were a disaster if I'm remembering correctly...I've heard of them snapping for no reason. Ping then put KT-M shafts in the Eye2s following the KT flop fiasco. JZ shafts with the red-colored Ping man graphic on the shafts stickers' are stiff flex, the blue are regular flex. Shaft changes are OK, so yes, you can have your clubfitter put in shafts you want.

The BeCu are indeed cool. A playing partner of mine who's got serious game has both the BeCu irons and the traditional Eye2s, and has added lead tape to his BeCu set so the sets "feel" the same. The tape is somewhat unsightly on such a pretty set of irons...but they're still dang pretty. I've read that soaking them overnight in Coca-Cola (or probably Pepsi, to be fair) shines 'em up nicely. Try Googling your butt off for more info...or maybe someone will chime in here in this thread.

Get matching serial numbers on your set, then call Ping to verify build specifications and authenticity (stock swingweight, shaft lengths, etc.). As I mentioned, mine are no longer true black dots, so it's very possible that the set you're considering has been altered by a previous owner. That's why it's a good idea to immediately take them to a respected clubfitter to have your "new to you" set checked for correct loft and lie. In my humble opinion, this is also true of any used clubs you buy. You never know how they've been doctored...or how many times a previous owner has damaged that PW by slamming it into hardpan turf due to a bad shot...and bad temper.

If you're buying the non-BeCu Eye2s, the cavity backs, if dirty and somewhat unsightly, can be brought back to life via scrubbing with a toothbrush and Bar Keepers Friend. It'll take you about the time to finish a six-pack...if you, uh...take your time.

Ping Eye2 owners are a loyal, passionate group, akin to owners of classic cars of a certain make and model. You may only see a 57 Chevy at a Sunday car show, yet you'll see Ping Eye2 irons on many of your local golf courses on that same Sunday...and on tour. No need to change irons when your handicap goes from 20 to 2 with PingEye2s.

Check out Ping's website under "classics" and ebay's buyers' guide for better and further information. Hope I helped...and have fun with your search.

Posted
Hey everyone, I'm a brand new user and can't start a thread yet, but wanted to introduce myself.

My name is John and I'm an avid golfer ever since I played my first round the day Tiger Woods won his first Masters. I'm 23 and about to start working at an accounting firm in DC.

The reason I am posting under this thread is because I, too, have a set of Ping Eye 2's. They were left to me by my grandfather after he passed away (he introduced me to the game). I recently did a little research on them in an attempt to figure out about reshafting them and I was amazed to see how popular the club is and how well it has retained its value.

I was wondering if anyone could tell me about my set, because it is a little unusual. I have a 1-PW blue dot set. They appear standard length next to my friend's clubs and the shafts look to be original steel (with some really old PING shaft bands on them...very tattered). The weird thing about these clubs is that on the back they have a "Pat. Pending" and "Karsten Manufacturing" logo is upside down relative to the rest of the type face. I knew it was weird when I saw a great company like PING with a Pat. Pending on the back of its club. I did more research and noticed how these clubs have retained their value remarkably well, but I also saw a lot of other things like "Square grooves", the dangers of reshafting, etc.

So...does anyone care to give me a brief primer on the Ping Eye 2's? I would love to get them reshafted (I'm 6'4" and think I need longer shafts) and regripped, but will this be as gauche as putting a CD player in a classic car? The clubs are in remarkably good condition and still hit great...I just want to maintain them in honor of the game, the "classic" element of the Ping Eye 2's, and the memory of the man who introduced me to this great game of golf.

Any insight is greatly appreciated,

John

Posted
You can get an extension for each club for pretty cheap at a Golfsmith, or something. While you're at it you can get them re-gripped as well. Extensions are pretty simple - although you'll need new grips since they have to cut the old ones off to get to the end of the shaft.
"Shouldn't you be going faster? I mean, you're doing 40 in a 65..."

Driver: Burner TP 9.5*
3 Wood: 906F2 15*
2I: Eye 23I-PW: 3100 I/HWedges: Vokey Spin-Milled 56*06, MP-R 52*07/60*05Putter: Victoria IIBall: Pro V1xCheck out my new blog: Thousand Yard DriveHome Course: Kenton County...

Posted
Wow,
My dad has an old set of Eye2's, black dot. I didn't realize they were this popular. He doesn't play anymore, and since they were my grandfather's clubs (strange coincidence) I don't think he's too inclined to let me hit them. He's kinda trying to "preserve" them.

I hate to change the subject of this topic, but are they a good game improving set of clubs? Should I try to get him to pass the torch and let me hit them, or just update what i have with newer technology? I'm just wondering if anyone has some insight on how these clubs would help and EXTREMELY high handicap golfer.
Thanks in advance,

Flux
I'm only at 13 clubs in the bag, what do you reccomend as a 14th? My foot wedge?


In the bag:
Driver - HiBore XL 10.5* Reg. Flex Fit- on Fuji GoldWoods - Tightlies GT2: 3 wood 15* & 5 wood 19* Surpass 7 wood 24*Irons - Eye 2 4-PW & a cheesey 1 iron blade I use for punch...

Posted
Hey flux,

That is a weird coincidence with both our grandfathers sharing similar golf club preferences!

Yeah, I never realized how popular the Eye2's were until my friend was researching Callaway X-16's and found the PGA.com site for used club trade in values. It listed the top used club search as Ping Eye 2's...that's when I started looking into them.

To answer your question, I think the Eye 2's were viewed as the first game improvement style iron. I hit them as well as I've hit any other club. My friend (he's a solid, but not great golfer...shoots low 90's) hits my Ping's as well if not better than his Callaway X-16's, which are a very good game improvement club for the high handicapper.

Thus, I think you might be surprised at how well you can hit Ping's even though they are almost 25 years old. Work on the old man and see if he'll let you take them out. They were meant to be played with, and short of you throwing them around or hitting off a tree root, I can't imagine you'd do too much damage to them. The only way I could understand your dad not using them is if he hopes to resell them one day. If not...why would you want to have clubs sit around unused?

-John

Posted
I found a set of black dot Eye 2 in a yard sale the other day for $20. I thought I had hit a jack pot as a back up set. I regripped them (golf pride tour velvet) and I think my Nike Pro-combos are in danger of being replaced, by these older, classic, pings.

In the Staff bag:
D1
906F 15.5º
585H 19º
AP2 4-gw 56º & 60º Tiger Woods Newport Art of Putting 2.0 Pro Platinum


Posted
Thats the deal I am waiting for... $200ish is the max I am looking at.

In my Matrix XTT bag,
on my Sun Mountain Speed Cart
LD M-Speed 10.5* Driver
V18 full set of starter clubs
3W, 3iw, 4iw, 5-S Irons and Wedges Kirk Currie KC4 PutterHome Course:Pajaro Valley Golf Clubwww.pajarovalleygolf.com


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
I have a set of original v-groove black dot Eye 2s, zz-lite shafts, c-9 swing weight, built on 05/31/83. All this courtesy of registering my set with Ping and then inquiring about them. Had 'em regripped and they play nicely, though I'm looking for a Ping hybrid/g2 hl combo to retire the longer irons from play.

So what about cleaning stains/etc from them. The cavities are somewhat dingy, and the some of the paint in the cavities has what looks like rust spots.

Rick

Posted
My Irons are pretty old and dulled. I got some Mother's metal polish one night and buffed them up to a nice shine a few weeks ago, but it only lasted about 2 rounds worth of play.
I'm only at 13 clubs in the bag, what do you reccomend as a 14th? My foot wedge?


In the bag:
Driver - HiBore XL 10.5* Reg. Flex Fit- on Fuji GoldWoods - Tightlies GT2: 3 wood 15* & 5 wood 19* Surpass 7 wood 24*Irons - Eye 2 4-PW & a cheesey 1 iron blade I use for punch...

  • 3 years later...
Posted

I have a rare set of Ping Eye 2 irons with the K shafts.  I'm not talking the KT or KT-M shafts.  These just have the letter K with light blue bands on the shaft band.  The steps go pretty low down toward the club and I've been told they are a stiff shaft.  However, I've seen them on Ebay and they are said to be regular shafts.  Does anyone know the flex of the Ping K shaft?  I believe they came out in 1984.


Posted

Yes, the Ping Eye 2s you own are the originals during the first year of production.  The patent was pending at the time so they could not imprint the patent number.  Your model has V grooves and was before Karsten came out with the square groove model in 1984.  The head itself in your set is also a litte different.  The soles are a little thinner and there is just the slightest difference in the cavity.  It's tough to see it but if you put them side by side you can tell.  In regard to Ping Eye 2 plus irons (that I've read in other threads) I think it's inferior to the Ping Eye 2 square groove model.  The heads are bulkier (especailly in the sand and lob wedges) and I don't think they have as good playability.  I just love the way the square groove model looks at address.

Originally Posted by siege02nd

Hey everyone, I'm a brand new user and can't start a thread yet, but wanted to introduce myself.

My name is John and I'm an avid golfer ever since I played my first round the day Tiger Woods won his first Masters. I'm 23 and about to start working at an accounting firm in DC.

The reason I am posting under this thread is because I, too, have a set of Ping Eye 2's. They were left to me by my grandfather after he passed away (he introduced me to the game). I recently did a little research on them in an attempt to figure out about reshafting them and I was amazed to see how popular the club is and how well it has retained its value.

I was wondering if anyone could tell me about my set, because it is a little unusual. I have a 1-PW blue dot set. They appear standard length next to my friend's clubs and the shafts look to be original steel (with some really old PING shaft bands on them...very tattered). The weird thing about these clubs is that on the back they have a "Pat. Pending" and "Karsten Manufacturing" logo is upside down relative to the rest of the type face. I knew it was weird when I saw a great company like PING with a Pat. Pending on the back of its club. I did more research and noticed how these clubs have retained their value remarkably well, but I also saw a lot of other things like "Square grooves", the dangers of reshafting, etc.

So...does anyone care to give me a brief primer on the Ping Eye 2's? I would love to get them reshafted (I'm 6'4" and think I need longer shafts) and regripped, but will this be as gauche as putting a CD player in a classic car? The clubs are in remarkably good condition and still hit great...I just want to maintain them in honor of the game, the "classic" element of the Ping Eye 2's, and the memory of the man who introduced me to this great game of golf.

Any insight is greatly appreciated,

John




Posted

Check out this Listing on EBAY....http://cgi.ebay.com/PING-RESTORE-REFINISH-YOUR-IRONS-ONLY-12-/270552165434?_trksid=p3286.m7&_trkparms=algo%3DLVI%26itu%3DUCI%26otn%3D3%26po%3DLVI%26ps%3D63%26clkid%3D540510666575555614#ht_3258wt_1136

Clubmaker that only restores PING Equipment......Looks pretty Snazzy.   Crazy coincidence I ran across this earlier tonight prior to logging on to Sandtrap.....I'm not a currently a Ping man, although I did own a set of copper Eye-2's in the late 80's.   Shoulda kept them.  Good luck with your project.

Snowman0157
 


Posted

I just bought a set of Ping Eye 2's with a blue dot from a guy at work.  The upright lie and extra length is exactly the right fit for me.  The set is a 3-PW with all matching serial numbers.  I paid $100 for them so I am very pleased with the deal.  Some of the shafts have a little rust on them...but the shafts on the 4 iron and the wedge are pretty bad.  Is it worth it to send them back to get done now or should I wait until winter and send the whole set back to Ping to be reshafted this winter?I like the clubs and the main issue is the cosmetics of the shafts....they seem to be fine for use.  I have read that Ping does outstanding work and the club will be like new when they come back.  Has anyone had a recent experience with having this kind of work done?


Note: This thread is 5293 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.