Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4833 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all,

Been lurking here for a while, finally decided to join to ask this:

At my FLGS, which deals in preowned and trade-ins, sits a set of Ping G10 irons with steel shafts, 4-PW. They've obviously been used but are in very good shape; they don't even need regripping. $240. I took the 6 to the indoor range and hit a few; very easy to swing, gave me just under the 150 yards I'd expect from a 6, and just a slight push (which is all player, and I was able to straighten it out with some ball address changes). Every review I can find says that these irons were a very good choice... in 2009. Newer than my current "Sunday bag" of Callaway Big Bertha knockoffs, but I wonder if maybe I'm leaving some genuinely helpful tech on the table by buying nearly 5 years old.

The reason I started looking again is that Golfsmith posted their e-mail ad for slashed prices on older model years of the TM Burner series GI irons, specifically the Burner Plus ($300) and Burner 2.0 ($400). I didn't get to demo either of these, but I did take an R11 6-iron for a spin... and *hated* it. I realize that's not an accurate comparison; the R11's a high-end "workable" set intended for people with actual ball-striking skill, while the Burners are GIs intended for... well, players like me, but it's still a bit of a stigma for the lower-end iron sets to overcome. I do have a Burner driver, 3w and "Heated" 4h (Burner knockoff), so I think TaylorMade makes some good stuff for me in this line, but I just dunno...

So, I guess the question for the gallery is, would the Ping G10 iron set be a good buy today for a high handicapper? Or, have there been any quantum leaps in GI club design between 2009 and now, and I should keep looking for a new set (or at least a newer used set)? I'm aware of the 2010 regulation changes that will *eventually* make these G10s non-conforming for the casual golfer, but that's 10 years down the road, and I don't plan on playing any elite tournaments in the meantime.


Posted

I believe that you can still buy Ping G15 clubs new (you can at the very least buy Ping G20's)

The value (IMHO) of ping is that they have a fantastic fitting system.  So unless you have been fit for Pings before and know your color code and shaft length, it is best (IMHO) to consider looking at the oldest ping club that you can still buy new and consider getting fit.

That being said, if you are still struggling to get consistent contact, I would suggest spending the money instead of on clubs on a few lessons instead.  You will likely find that your clubs (as with even the best golfers) are often times not the limiting factor in a persons game.

Likely as you continue to improve, you will start to groove a swing and once you have that swing set you will be able to determine which clubs are right for you.

In my bag:

some golf clubs

a few golf balls

a bag of tee's some already broken the rest soon to be

a snickers wrapper (if you have seen me play, you would know you are not going anywhere for a while)

and an empty bottle of water


Posted
Originally Posted by clearwaterms

I believe that you can still buy Ping G15 clubs new (you can at the very least buy Ping G20's)

The value (IMHO) of ping is that they have a fantastic fitting system.  So unless you have been fit for Pings before and know your color code and shaft length, it is best (IMHO) to consider looking at the oldest ping club that you can still buy new and consider getting fit.

That being said, if you are still struggling to get consistent contact, I would suggest spending the money instead of on clubs on a few lessons instead.  You will likely find that your clubs (as with even the best golfers) are often times not the limiting factor in a persons game.

Likely as you continue to improve, you will start to groove a swing and once you have that swing set you will be able to determine which clubs are right for you.

Good points. Perhaps it would be prudent to say that this would be my first full set of irons; the "Sunday bag" I currently play with is odd lofts only, and I find sometimes I miss having that 6 or 8, which to me means that it's time to invest in a full set. The long irons in the set I have are also graphite shafted (UST Comp 75; nothing fancy), and compared to steel-shafted demo clubs in the store I find it doesn't gain me any distance, so I'd rather have steel, for as much consistency as I can get.

I have spent some time and money on lessons, and my ball striking and flight path are much better than when I started playing (which is also when I got these irons fitted to me). So, I feel that a new full set of irons that I can continue to improve with is in order.

I will take a second look at the dot color now that I know what they mean. According to Ping's basic fitting tool, I'm right on the cusp between black and blue (so one step further upright), and between standard shaft length and an extra 1/4". These felt good, but pushed, which may mean they were a little flat, or it may just be the Indian and not the arrow (like I said, they straightened out by moving the ball an inch or two forward).

Let's assume, for a minute, that the G10s ended up being a perfect fit (or could get that way with a minor tweak; Ping's own docs say the G10s can be adjusted up to five colors from their starting color). Good buy at $240, or would you still recommend looking for newer even if that means more money?


Posted
Get the Ping fitting and see if the G10s match. If not you could send them to Ping for adjustment but that will cost you at least the shipping. You wouldn't have to pay too much more for new Pings though with no extra charge if they have to be assembled at Ping.

:tmade: SLDRs 14* driver, 17* fairway, 19* and 22* hybrids | :odyssey: Versa White #1 putter

:nike: XR Pro 24*, 27*, 31*, 35.5*, 40*, 45*, 50* irons | :vokey: SM4 54*, 58* wedges


Posted

One thing to consider is how much clubhead speed you have. If you have moderate clubhead speed, the Ping G10's super-friendly perimeter weighted head, plus a high-launch shaft may cause your short irons to balloon. Not much fun on a windy day.

I tried the G10 a couple of years ago, and ended going with the Callaway X20. Both had the UGI head, but the X20 had a stock Uniflex shaft with a middle kickpoint. It had medium launch rather than ballooning like the G10s did.

Just something to consider.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha B16 OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If I were you I would check out the Burner 1.0 irons and the Burner plus(I use 1.0). They are both great iron sets and are extremely forgiving.

Driver: :tmade: Burner '08 10.5* 3 wood: :tmade: Rocketballz 15* 3 hybrid: :tmade: Burner Superlaunch 18* 4 hybrid: :tmade: Rescue 11 21* Irons: :tmade: Burner 1.0 5-AW Wedges: :vokey: Spin Milled 54* :cleve: CG16 58* Putter: :odyssey: 2 Ball Blade Grips: Golf Pride VDR white Balls: :titleist: Velocity Bag: :tmade: Audi bag


Note: This thread is 4833 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Depends on how short you were coming up on these shots. A bit more wind? Also, maybe you were swinging at 2-3 mph slower the next day.  I think the biggest thing is not adjusting. Like making assuming your stock shot is not enough and taking 1 club up. Not sure what type of adjustments you were making in your decision making. 
    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.