Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4582 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by saevel25

Still thought, for longer clubs, the lie doesn't really matter that much, it wont start the ball that far off left to be significant.

I know. :)


Originally Posted by saevel25

I have to agree, in both my leagues i play in, i can count on two hands the number of players that play a draw. That's out of 50-60 people. So, maybe 1 out of 10, maybe 1 out of 9 people play a draw from the sample group of people i play golf with. Majority of those people who slice, hit a pull slice. Rarely do you see a push slice, even a pull slice with an open enough face can look like a push slice.

Precisely. Virtually nobody who has played golf for a few months actually plays a (target) push-slice (face right of target, path left of that). Virtually everyone who slices does so with a face LEFT of the target.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Precisely. Virtually nobody who has played golf for a few months actually plays a (target) push-slice (face right of target, path left of that). Virtually everyone who slices does so with a face LEFT of the target.

Not me right now.

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I do think a draw is longer, at least mine is. Lasered a bunch of drives this morning: 10 fades: 8/10 in the fairway. Avg. 260-270 (shorter than I thought). 10 draws: 3/10 in the fairway (clearly I have some work to do). Avg. 280-290. I have no idea why this is, but I'm thinking the spin rate on my fades is a bit higher.

Posted
Originally Posted by SoundandFury

I do think a draw is longer, at least mine is. Lasered a bunch of drives this morning:

10 fades: 8/10 in the fairway. Avg. 260-270 (shorter than I thought).

10 draws: 3/10 in the fairway (clearly I have some work to do). Avg. 280-290.

I have no idea why this is, but I'm thinking the spin rate on my fades is a bit higher.

I think if you can hit a high draw with a lot of swing speed, which I have never been able to do this could be the case.

Fade's are a bit easier to control when it goes bad.  It always seems when many of us start out with a tight fade, something happens over time causing the fade to become more and more severe.  It is frustrating and we start dreaming of high draws, but in the end you can still control it relatively easily .  And of course you lose distance when this happens.

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

I'm still waiting for the actual "data" that shows anything. A draw is hit with a face that's rotated LESS through impact. If anything, there's less "release" of the club with a draw than a fade. I understand what you think you're saying about the arms coming off the body or working in a different direction than the hips (though they are in a fade too), but so what? That's just letting your arms swing off your chest, which faders will often do early in the downswing, while drawers do it later in the downswing.

I still say the answer is the one I gave well above: draws TEND to be hit with lower spin loft, and the way many people TEND to hit draws leads to less consistent and "touchier" impact alignments than how people TEND to hit fades.

Upright clubs would promote a ball that starts a bit farther left. I seriously doubt that "most players hit draws" - the slice is still BY FAR the predominant shot shape among "most players."

You can check out the trackman data anytime...just visit thier website. It's been proven that the way we understand a fade/draw has changed. Your discussion of spin is very accurate, but I have experimented with the feel of both and know for a fact that your hands play a far more critical role that either of us discussed. Either way, we are saying very similar things...and I doubt arguing over semantics is worth it at this point.

HOWEVER, I recently did some research on club manufacturing specs. Over the past 4 years...clubs have become more upright and turned down. Take a look at the rocketbladz specs and my case is made. Although an upright club promotes a shot starting left, it also forces your hands to become more upright at impact if you plan to hit it straight...there are only two ways to accomplish this, and they both lead to swing planes that resemble a "traditional" draw/hook.

No other need to argue...the specs speak for themselves. I've had to flatten every club I've bought this year to 2005 "standard" lie angles (which by the way took a lot of searching to find). They were right off the rack, Mizuno MP-59's... explain that?


Posted
Originally Posted by Second Chance

You can check out the trackman data anytime...just visit thier website. It's been proven that the way we understand a fade/draw has changed. Your discussion of spin is very accurate, but I have experimented with the feel of both and know for a fact that your hands play a far more critical role that either of us discussed. Either way, we are saying very similar things...and I doubt arguing over semantics is worth it at this point.

HOWEVER, I recently did some research on club manufacturing specs. Over the past 4 years...clubs have become more upright and turned down. Take a look at the rocketbladz specs and my case is made. Although an upright club promotes a shot starting left, it also forces your hands to become more upright at impact if you plan to hit it straight...there are only two ways to accomplish this, and they both lead to swing planes that resemble a "traditional" draw/hook.

No other need to argue...the specs speak for themselves. I've had to flatten every club I've bought this year to 2005 "standard" lie angles (which by the way took a lot of searching to find). They were right off the rack, Mizuno MP-59's... explain that?

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Second Chance

You can check out the trackman data anytime...just visit thier website. It's been proven that the way we understand a fade/draw has changed.

Look, not to belabor the point, but I'm pretty confident in my knowledge of the ball flight, spin, club dynamics, etc. And I don't mean the way people thought prior to 1991, or anything like that. I mean the latest, current knowledge.


Originally Posted by Second Chance

Your discussion of spin is very accurate, but I have experimented with the feel of both and know for a fact that your hands play a far more critical role that either of us discussed.

That's you. And don't quote "feels" to me. You want to talk science, let's talk science. You want to talk your "feels" then I'm out and wish you good luck discussing anything beyond what YOUR swing needs to do or feel like or whatever to produce the relevant and correct impact conditions.

Originally Posted by Second Chance

HOWEVER, I recently did some research on club manufacturing specs. Over the past 4 years...clubs have become more upright and turned down. Take a look at the rocketbladz specs and my case is made.

They do this so the ball starts more to the left. A ball that starts a little farther left with the same path will indeed slice less, but the majority of golfers are NOT hitting draws. The majority still slice.

Originally Posted by Second Chance

Although an upright club promotes a shot starting left, it also forces your hands to become more upright at impact if you plan to hit it straight...there are only two ways to accomplish this, and they both lead to swing planes that resemble a "traditional" draw/hook.

I agree with the bold. I do not agree with anything there that's not bold.

But YOU may have some unique things that you FEEL like you do in YOUR swing. That doesn't mean they work for everyone, and it definitely doesn't mean your "science" is correct.

P.S. Again, a few degrees more upright - especially with a longer shaft that will have a bit more droop - does not affect start lines. And again, most people are not hitting draws. It just ain't close to the truth.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I can't disagree with your feedback...and your experience in this field. I just think that once people under how the swing path and impact angles affect ball flight it becomes an issue of feel. Some feel it in their hands, others in their legs/arms, etc.


Note: This thread is 4582 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • In driving a car you have all sorts of random or variable parts, though. Different speeds, corners, conditions, size of turns… even different cars and sizes, different traffic and laws (lights, signs, etc.). I don't think I've seen anyone doing "block practice" to practice the same exact turn 100 times, then trying it in the real world.
    • IMHO, block practice is good. Any new motor pattern or a 'move' has to be committed to muscle memory and be reproducable at command without conscious thought as the final goal. I don't see how this is that much different than learning how to drive a car, or let's say how to handle the steering for example. One must do it enough times and then also do it in different situations to commit to all layers of brain - judgment of demand, decision making, judgment of response and finally execution. Unless each layer is familiar of each of their role in the specific motor move, it is not truly learned and you will simply fall back to the original pattern. I think the random practice is simply committing the learned pattern to different scenarios or intervals of time to replicate in the real world (actual rounds). It breeds further familiarity learned from block practice. Steer the car a hundred times to learn the move (block) and then drive the car all over town to make it real world (random) to a level of maturity. I don't see how block and random have to be in conflict with each other.  
    • Yea, I think the first thing is to define block, variable, and random practice with regards to golf.  The easiest one might be in practicing distance control for putting. Block practice would be just hitting 50 putts from 5 feet, then 50 putts from 10 ft then 50 putts from 15 ft. While random practice would having a different distance putt for every putt.  In terms of learning a new motor pattern, like let's say you want to make sure the clubhead goes outside the hands in the backswing. I am not sure how to structure random practice. Maybe block practice is just making the same 100 movements over and over again. I don't get how a random practice is structured for something like learning a new motor pattern for the golf swing.  Like, if a NFL QB needs to work on their throw. They want to get the ball higher above the shoulder. How would random practice be structured? Would they just need someone there to say, yes or no for feedback? That way the QB can go through an assortment of passing drills and throws trying to get the wright throwing motion?  For me, how do you structure the feedback and be time effective. Let's say you want to work on the club path in the backswing. You go out to the course to get some random practice. Do you need to set up the camera at each spot, check after each shot to make it random?  I know that feedback is also a HUGE part of learning. I could say, I went to the golf course and worked on my swing. If I made 40 golf swings on the course, what if none of them were good reps because I couldn't get any feedback? What if I regressed? 
    • I found it odd that both Drs. (Raymond Prior and Greg Rose) in their separate videos gave the same exact math problem (23 x 12), and both made the point of comparing block practice to solving the same exact math problem (23 x 12) over and over again. But I've made the point that when you are learning your multiplication tables… you do a bunch of similar multiplications over and over again. You do 7 x 8, then 9 x 4, then 3 x 5, then 2 x 6, and so on. So, I think when golf instructors talk about block practice, they're really not understanding what it actually is, and they're assuming that someone trying to kinda do the same thing is block practice, but when Dr. Raymond Prior said on my podcast that what I was describing was variable practice… then… well, that changes things. It changes the results of everything you've heard about how "block" practice is bad (or ineffective).
    • Day 121 12-11 Practice session this morning. Slowing the swing down. 3/4 swings, Getting to lead side better, trying to feel more in sync with swing. Hit foam balls. Good session overall. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.