Jump to content
IGNORED

My Review: Bridgestone J40 Cavity Back Irons


Note: This thread is 3332 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I obtained a brand new set of Bridgestone J40 CB irons about a month ago.  They came standard length and lie with Nippon NS Pro 1050gh shafts (reg flex).  I put them in the bag right away and played 6 rounds with them and wanted to share my thoughts and review of these irons with everyone.....

I've never been one to really care too much about the looks of a club as I prefer performance all day over looks.  With this being said, if you can have a club that performs great and looks amazing on top of it, why not?  Keeping the look classic, Bridgestone did a great job and arguably they are the best looking irons out there.  Smooth lines and classic looks has you thinking that it's a blade at first until you realize that it is a true cavity back.  I lost track of the compliments that I received from people that saw them and thought they were beautiful.

While they are cavity backs, these irons are more player irons than game improvement.  There is much less offset and the head of each iron is much thinner than most cavity back offerings from other manufacturers.  They are fully forged (not just a forged face) and are well made.

I was coming off playing Taylormade R11 irons and you could clearly see that the J40's were better made with their forged heads but also had smaller heads, less offset, and would be potentially less forgiving.  This turned out to be very true.  The first thing I noticed was the rather large difference in lofts versus the R11's and the J40s.  Now each set of irons are going to have their own lofts but the difference was quite big comparing the R11's versus the J40's.  We are not talking about just a degree or two here and there, the difference was at least one club and in some cases even more than that.  It started at the 4 iron of the J40's which had the same loft as the 5 iron did in the R11's.  It continued as you went higher with the 9 iron of the J40's being 43 degrees which was almost equal to the PW of the R11 (45 degrees).

Just this difference alone took some getting used to as far as picking the right club was concerned.  I tried not to let it affect me but I know that it did, the fact that I was supposed to be playing newer and better irons yet for some reason they were not going nearly as far as my older irons that were of poorer quality.  While my ball flight improved (that's why I got the new irons), the distance loss was noticable and was going to take a lot of getting used to.

The J40's were less forgiving but I noticed that they seemed to "cut" through the rough better which made shots out of rough a bit easier.  I had to be very careful though as they were overall much less forgiving than the R11's.  If you got too steep with one of the J40's on a shot from the fairway, you were going to pay for it.

Both sets of irons had regular flex shafts and I was expecting I would like the Bridgestone's more since the shafts were heavier.  Maybe I just have not gotten used to them enough but last weekend I put the R11's back in the bag and shot my first round of sub 80.  I'm not giving up completely on the J40's, I just need to play them more and get used to them more.  They are great irons, but your ball striking has to be very good and I guess mine is just not there yet.  I am dissapointed with the Nippon shafts.  Apparently the J40's are offered with the Project X shafts which I have heard nothing but good things about and I should have probably gotten these irons with those shafts.

Overall a very good set of irons that I plan on "growing into" as my game continues to improve.  While they are cavity backs, I would say that they are much more of a players irons versus a game improvement iron though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

How about posting a copy of this review here:

http://thesandtrap.com/products/bridgestone-j40-dual-pocket-cavity-irons

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There are two j 40's....

One is a V cavity conventional with a MPF of 455... A players club really...

And a straight cavity with a MPF of 682... Game improvment...

Your r11's have a MPF of 508 conventional...Players club... ( not forged right?)

But I dont believe the maltby thing to some extent...

Dont know which one you have but there is no reason you should not be able to hit it coming from the r11's...( espeacially the straght cavity) Its my experience with old blades, blades,  and forged clubs that the sweet spot is more towards the hosel... So when you set up you should be like cupping the ball if you know what I mean....

I hit the callaway x forged at a demo and that has a 373 MPF... I hit that better that any club out there... Even the ultr game improvments...

Just my opinion...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 1 year later...
  • Moderator

If anyone is looking for a new set of these, I have a few I'm selling due to job loss.


Welcome to the forum.  We have a section for equipment sale called Marketplace. If you take pictures, you can post them there with a price.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3332 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 120 - Played 18; much better than yesterday. Miss right now is off the heel of the club, so I need to sort that out. 
    • Today we played Pease Golf Course in Portsmouth, NH. Course was in great shape but my game didn't show up. I will say I pitched and chipped fairly well but almost everything else was very hit or miss. Cost myself a lot hitting an in play drive with pulling my approach shots maybe 85% of the time. Finally figured out I had been swaying most of the round. Only took me until 13 to figure it out. Used what felt like a much more centered turn and the ballstriking improved. 18 tomorrow using a 2 man scramble format. Just looking to contribute. Been a blast though. 
    • Day 22: Hit balls with 7-iron using mevo+ to track dispersion. Was out for a long time after work; 86 balls but the first 50+ were 50% swings focusing on top of backswing feel and then just hitting the ball as a psychic reward. Finished with 20 balls close to full speed. Pretty happy with dispersion and also no horrendous misses. I’m chunking my priority piece out into two separate feels, first and more important is the position/balance at top of backswing which is what I was working on. Once I have that engrained I’ll move to transition part. 
    • FWIW I never really had issues with the previous generation of Snells. But… I'm not sure I played them a ton, either.
    • I know Dean Snell designed the original Pro V along with a couple of other brands tour balls.  How exactly does the Snell ball have problems.  Did he change something in the design or is a manufacturing error since he cannot afford the unlimited R&D budgets of the big manufacturers to iron out flaws
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...