Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4485 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey this is my first post on here so im hoping this hasnt been covered elsewhere, tried searching for it but didnt find anything along this lines so heres my question. Ive just started playing a few months ago only played seven rounds to date but have been inconsistent on my irons all the way up to the wedges. Part of the reason is i sweep the ball and try not to leave a divot on the swing. My woods and hybrids being meant more for a sweeping motion are great. So would a 2-pw set off hybrids work out better than irons. Short term, long term.

Thanks any and all responses appreaciated.

NIke VRS covert

Mini driver 14 degree

Nike covert 5 wood

taylormade sldr 4 hybrid

Taylormade Rocketballz Irons:  6-aw

Taylormade atv  56,60,64

Jpl Putter

Nxt tour s yellow


Posted

My wife has a set of all hybrids down through the sand wedge. It's great for her and allows her to play much better than she ever could if she was using irons.

She started playing in her 50s, doesn't like to practice (in fact WILL NOT practice), isn't exactly a natural at the game (except for putting and bump and runs), and has no real aspirations of getting better than she is.

For somebody in that situation I think it's a good move. For others maybe not.


Posted

Your best bet might be to take a look at the Adams a12os set of irons.  There are a number of variations in the clubs:  3-pw, 4-gw, 4-sw.  For a beginning golfer this set of irons is usually a pretty good option.  (A new set is around $400.)

Another option is the Adams Idea Tech V3R Hybrid Irons

There is a newer model - the Adams Idea Tech V4 Hybrid Irons. This model generally new would be around $700.  (below)

You should be able to go to Dick's or Golf Galaxy to give these clubs a test drive, and then decide for yourself if you think that they will work.

Adams a12os Hybrid Irons

Adams Idea Tech V4 Hybrid Irons

Drivers: Bag 1 - TM R11 (10.5°); Bag 2 - Ping G5 (9°),
Fairway woods: #1 - TM RBZ Tour (14.5°) & TM System 2 Raylor (17°); #2 - TM Burner (15°) & TM V-Steel (18°)
Hybrid: #1 - TM Rocketballz (19°); #2 - Ping G5 (19°)
Irons: #1 - Ping i3+; #2 - Hogan Edge  (both 4-pw, +1" shaft)
Wedges: #1 - Ping i3+ U wedge (52°) & Ping Eye 2+ BeCu (60°); #2 - Ping ISI Sand BeCu (52°) & Cleveland CG11 lob (60°)
Putters: Ping B60i & Anser 2, Odyssey White Steel 2-Ball & White Hot XG #9, Lamkim Jumbp grips
Golf Balls: Titleist Pro V1, Bridgestone B330, Callaway SR1, Slazenger Grips: Lamkin Crossline
Golf Shoes: Footjoy & Adidas; Golf Glove: Footjoy StaSof®; Golf Bag: Ping Hoofer
I love this game! :-D


Posted

You could also look at the Cleveland Altitudes.  Ive heard great things about them.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


Posted

I can attest to the awesomeness of the 588 Altitude because I own them. After lurking at a different forum with a high percentage of low handicap members singing their praises I took a chance. Well not much of a chance since I already had the 588 TT's and the clubs are made to mix and match. That's really what sets them apart. All it takes it hitting them to get past the ugliness.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Dave2512

I can attest to the awesomeness of the 588 Altitude because I own them. After lurking at a different forum with a high percentage of low handicap members singing their praises I took a chance. Well not much of a chance since I already had the 588 TT's and the clubs are made to mix and match. That's really what sets them apart. All it takes it hitting them to get past the ugliness.


Agree.  I played in a golf outing earlier this year with a guy who had a set of Altitudes and they are fugly and all the headcovers looks funny but they do work.  That guy had far from a perfect swing but all day long he was hitting shots that went high and far but still landed nice and soft.

Im not sure that Im ready for a full set of Altitudes but Id probably go with hybrids to replace the 3-5 irons.  Thats the setup I have right now with my Nike Slingshot HLs and I really like it.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


Posted

I didn't buy the 588 Altitude because I had problems getting the ball in the air. As I mentioned it was after reading reviews from low handicap golfers that the clubs felt more iron like than hybrid. More than one mentioned that if you could do a blindfold test it would be difficult to tell the difference between the Altitude and the TT on well struck shots. Which I found to be true, the steel shafts and shorter length are all iron. It's all about the iron feel, consistency and forgiveness for me. I liked my AMP Cell hybrids but there were times the ball ballooned or pop up, tough to do that with an iron. To hit it really bad really requires total swing implosion, something like a topped shot where it dives directly into the ground. Otherwise even shot that don't feel quite right fly in the intended direction with little loss of distance. Because of the strong lofts I went with 4-6, which is really 3-5. Though I wish they offered a 1 iron. That could be a very cool thing.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Thanks all to your responses the clubs mentioned were way out of my price range so went with pinemeadow excel strong hybrids 2-pw. They be here in a week and a half ill let u all know how they play.

NIke VRS covert

Mini driver 14 degree

Nike covert 5 wood

taylormade sldr 4 hybrid

Taylormade Rocketballz Irons:  6-aw

Taylormade atv  56,60,64

Jpl Putter

Nxt tour s yellow


  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Ok finally got the clubs yesterday got out with them today...only got 3-pw as they were sound out of the 2.  My distance seemed better than with irons but ive been experimenting between split grip and interlocking ( more distance with interlocking but with a bad slice, straight but short with a chance of hitting down to hard with split).  Altogether id have to say i like them, ill comment more later on as i get more experience with them.

NIke VRS covert

Mini driver 14 degree

Nike covert 5 wood

taylormade sldr 4 hybrid

Taylormade Rocketballz Irons:  6-aw

Taylormade atv  56,60,64

Jpl Putter

Nxt tour s yellow


Posted

Ok ive had some time to play a few rounds with these new clubs. First observation is that I am getting more distance, but feel i could be getting more if the balls flight wasnt so high. I hit a pitching wedge the other day and it went just as high in the air as it did length wise. Some of that has to do though with me hitting up on the hybrids as compared to trying to hit down on the irons. Did shoot best round so far with them though.

NIke VRS covert

Mini driver 14 degree

Nike covert 5 wood

taylormade sldr 4 hybrid

Taylormade Rocketballz Irons:  6-aw

Taylormade atv  56,60,64

Jpl Putter

Nxt tour s yellow


Note: This thread is 4485 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.