Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4404 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Few years ago I was into this hard core but stopped for about a year. I took up golf 5 months ago and I struggle with distance (i'm 29 and quite slim build). Anyway a guy told me to go gym so I started P90X again and I can definitely feel me hitting slightly further. I don't work out as much though because I do 18 holes once or twice a week. Doing a 5-6 day workout is too much with golf rounds ontop so I workout 3 days a week now

Chest and Back

Shoulders and Arms

Legs and Back

Be interesting to see if anyone else does this workout whilst playing golf and to see what they do different


Posted

I did it and a hybrid of P90X, P90X+ and Insanity for about 18 months.

Then I took some time off.

I've just restarted again about 3 weeks ago.

(I'm the 47 year old guy with two bad knees and asthma - and under this workout I run circles and lift more than 90% of the kids around me 20 years younger).

It's great for anything.  General fitness, etc.  I would say that it's a bit intense for most. and also too hard for most people I see around.  But one can build up to it.  I wouldn't change anything about it for golf.  Maybe one thing, it's VERY shoulder and core intensive, so be aware of your shoulders and how they feel during the workout and during rounds.  Also, the Back workouts don't really address the lower/lumbar area much - I'd augment with sets of romainian deadlifts or the like.

But if all you are doing is the lifting workouts and avoiding the others (Cardio, Plyo and Yoga) - then you are seriously missing hte point of it.

That said, those are great lifting workouts.  So if that's what you want - it's great.  But at this point, it's not the program.  It's just supersetting three days a week and hitting each body area once a week.  You don't need the vids for lifting - just the techniques and the workout logs.  I get those done in half the time because I don't listen to the creepy man.

If I had to pick with your schedule - I'd do half of each of those and add some form of cardio each of those days.  Yoga often if you can, and do abs while watching TV as a bonus.  That specific Yoga workout is the keystone, IMO.

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I did it and a hybrid of P90X, P90X+ and Insanity for about 18 months.

Then I took some time off.

I've just restarted again about 3 weeks ago.

(I'm the 47 year old guy with two bad knees and asthma - and under this workout I run circles and lift more than 90% of the kids around me 20 years younger).

It's great for anything.  General fitness, etc.  I would say that it's a bit intense for most. and also too hard for most people I see around.  But one can build up to it.  I wouldn't change anything about it for golf.  Maybe one thing, it's VERY shoulder and core intensive, so be aware of your shoulders and how they feel during the workout and during rounds.  Also, the Back workouts don't really address the lower/lumbar area much - I'd augment with sets of romainian deadlifts or the like.

But if all you are doing is the lifting workouts and avoiding the others (Cardio, Plyo and Yoga) - then you are seriously missing hte point of it.

That said, those are great lifting workouts.  So if that's what you want - it's great.  But at this point, it's not the program.  It's just supersetting three days a week and hitting each body area once a week.  You don't need the vids for lifting - just the techniques and the workout logs.  I get those done in half the time because I don't listen to the creepy man.

If I had to pick with your schedule - I'd do half of each of those and add some form of cardio each of those days.  Yoga often if you can, and do abs while watching TV as a bonus.  That specific Yoga workout is the keystone, IMO.

I do the abs with the 3 workouts I forgot to mention to mon-wed-fri I do ab ripper. I used to do the Yoga but its quite hard but I will definitely give it ago again. I fly threw the other workouts i'm a pullup/pushup monster lol.

Are there any good routines for the back that you said this program misses? Lower/Lumbar area you mentioned?

Cheers


Posted

Not routines, I just replace a couple of the pull up sets (from the 3 workouts:  chest and back, legs and back, Back and biceps) with romanian deadlifts (straight legs, straight back, bend at the waist, heavy weights, and just straighten the back to stand up  - pretty much bowing with weight hanging from your arms - focus on the hams, butt and lower back).

Frankly, if you are ditching cardio and plyo - get an Insanity DVD and just do the 10 minute warmup from those - it's great.  Not a full push, but MUCH better than nothing.

  • Upvote 1

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Not routines, I just replace a couple of the pull up sets (from the 3 workouts:  chest and back, legs and back, Back and biceps) with romanian deadlifts (straight legs, straight back, bend at the waist, heavy weights, and just straighten the back to stand up  - pretty much bowing with weight hanging from your arms - focus on the hams, butt and lower back).

Frankly, if you are ditching cardio and plyo - get an Insanity DVD and just do the 10 minute warmup from those - it's great.  Not a full push, but MUCH better than nothing.

Awesome i'll give it a try. I have the insanity DVD lyring around somewhere as well. I just find with the cardio and plyo it just seems to go on for way too long.

Thanks for the great advice though.

EDIT: Which Insanity DVD was the one with that warmup? I have all the DVD's for that program. Thanks


Posted

EDIT: Which Insanity DVD was the one with that warmup? I have all the DVD's for that program. Thanks

they all have a warmup

I tended to replace the Plyo and Cardio days with the "Pure Cardio" Insanity DVD.  This was after Plyo and Cardio got easy to do.  (At first, they were freakly difficult - but the body adapts, doesn't it?).  Pure C never got easy for me....not....at.....alll

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

they all have a warmup

I tended to replace the Plyo and Cardio days with the "Pure Cardio" Insanity DVD.  This was after Plyo and Cardio got easy to do.  (At first, they were freakly difficult - but the body adapts, doesn't it?).  Pure C never got easy for me....not....at.....alll

Didn't know if they have different warmup routines like P90X.

I will give the Pure Cardio a shot see how I get on. You've made me want to do Yoga again now lol. I can see me getting back into this pretty hardcore now.


Posted

I've tried all the Beach Body stuff except T25. My favorite is 10 Minute Trainer because it can be anything you want it to. You can stack the programs, use just 10 minutes after lifting, incorporate it into your cardio etc. If time is tight and I just do 10 minutes because I finish it I still feel like I did completed something. I use it almost daily because I like band work. Typically I do it at night after dinner. I do my main workout in the morning before work. I don't do any golf specific exercise. IMO time spent on drills and practice is more worthwhile.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I've tried all the Beach Body stuff except T25. My favorite is 10 Minute Trainer because it can be anything you want it to. You can stack the programs, use just 10 minutes after lifting, incorporate it into your cardio etc. If time is tight and I just do 10 minutes because I finish it I still feel like I did completed something. I use it almost daily because I like band work. Typically I do it at night after dinner. I do my main workout in the morning before work. I don't do any golf specific exercise. IMO time spent on drills and practice is more worthwhile.

Thanks for tips. I don't have much time to workout probably an hour a night at home. I tend to cut it short to work on little things around the house like putting and grip drills just to make sure I do it the same when I am on the course. With the bad weather though I hear its the best time to workout lol.

I'll have a look at that 10 min trainer you mentioned as well. I just want to try get more distance really. My accuracy with my irons is very good but I struggle for distance. With my age (29 and slim build) I would have thought I can hit it a bit further. I can only hit my driver 200 and 9 iron 105 :(

Just trying whatever I can to get the extra distance to make the game a bit easier.

On a short par 4 its pretty much Driver > Hybrid 19 > PW > Putt for par (usually 2 for bogey)


Posted

I'm guessing your lack of distance has little to do with your build and everything to do with being new to golf. Your time would be better spent with some lessons. I'm certainly not discouraging exercise but at your age I doubt lack of fitness is the cause. I can't even remember what it feels like to be 29.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm guessing your lack of distance has little to do with your build and everything to do with being new to golf. Your time would be better spent with some lessons. I'm certainly not discouraging exercise but at your age I doubt lack of fitness is the cause. I can't even remember what it feels like to be 29.

lol no comment on the age situation.

I have had 3 lessons but it felt very much watch and tell, where he would just watch what i'm doing and say ok you are doing this wrong, try this. I know this is a traditional teaching method but I would prefer to actually see for myself what I am doing wrong. For £23 for half hour I felt a bit ripped off. He did help me get started and I used what he taught me and got a lot better but most of what he taught me can be found on youtube. We don't have any pro's in our area that work with technology which I would easily pay for. I definitely think as I am progressing I am hitting further. I couldn't even hit my driver when I first started literally missed the ball every time lol.


  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
Hi My only advice to golfers is that if you want to get better at golf, it is no longer enough to get fit. You need to get as close to the sport as possible! So that exercises you choose need to match the mechanics of the golf swing otherwise they will not carry over to performance. Steve

Note: This thread is 4404 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.