Jump to content
IGNORED

New irons with wider sole?


Note: This thread is 3636 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Hello,

Im a 2 hcp player and when I was younger I always played the big bertha irons with large sole with forgiving shots. 2 years ago I changed to the callaway razr forged irons which really looked nice and thought that would work well. However, everytime I borrow a club with a wider sole I hit the ball much better and much longer. I hit down on the ball quite much and dont know if the bounce is too little as I also tend to hit it thick quite often with the mid irons.

Has anyone had the same experience and are playing wide sole clubs although they are low handicap player?

Im looking to buy new irons that are not so thin and forged, Nike or another Callaway set would be nice, any suggestions?

thanks,

D

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That is an interesting question.  Is it the sole that is changing the shot or the center of gravity?  A big sole club would also have a lower center of gravity.  Also in general a 2 hcp player is striking down on the ball and at impact the sole should have no effect.  It may help keep the club from digging though.  The wide sole would also help if you got a fat one now and then.

I was thinking today about the "phrase working the ball".  Generally better player clubs are touted as being easier to work the ball.  I can certainly curve the ball with any club, how different could it be?  If you start talking about controlling trajectory that might be another story.  Just recently I have been able control the trajectory to a degree, that is a very helpful tool.

There is nothing wrong with "game improvement" club.  I have become a fan of Ping even though I only have one Ping club.  It appears to me that the engineering department is dominant in Ping, every other large manufacturer is definitely run by Marketing.  Add the G25 irons to your list.

Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That is an interesting question.  Is it the sole that is changing the shot or the center of gravity?  A big sole club would also have a lower center of gravity.  Also in general a 2 hcp player is striking down on the ball and at impact the sole should have no effect.  It may help keep the club from digging though.  The wide sole would also help if you got a fat one now and then.

I was thinking today about the "phrase working the ball".  Generally better player clubs are touted as being easier to work the ball.  I can certainly curve the ball with any club, how different could it be?  If you start talking about controlling trajectory that might be another story.  Just recently I have been able control the trajectory to a degree, that is a very helpful tool.

There is nothing wrong with "game improvement" club.  I have become a fan of Ping even though I only have one Ping club.  It appears to me that the engineering department is dominant in Ping, every other large manufacturer is definitely run by Marketing.  Add the G25 irons to your list.

Good luck.

Yeah the problem I have is that I think the blade clubs dig the ball a bit easier so I hit it thick more times. Could also be that I place the ball too much on my left foot :)

I agree that blade clubs are better for working the ball with different cuts but surprisingly I almost never need to do that, perhaps im playing courses that are too easy.

Ill def check the G25 out although those look really big, I also like Nike covert irons, even the forged ones.

Thanks again for your answer, very helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Mark Crossfield is a pro, was around scratch as an amature, has some of the best teaching videos on youtube, and says he still plays best with fat-soled game improvement irons.  I believe he's currently playing the Mizuno JPX-EZ.

http://youtu.be/3eL7fW-OoyU

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The turf grass and soil type where you play can make a wider sole more preferable. My only problem with wide sole clubs is that the short irons don't seem as accurate and have less touch.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3636 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Of course. I've used different words to start, but like 90-95% of the time it's been this one. And I'm unlikely to switch now.
    • Welcome to TST @Camjr.   We're glad you've joined.  
    • Angle is not a factor. I hit the ball 100’ high. Par is net birdie. My CH is 16. The rough between the bunkers is like 10’ wide though. That’s not something you’re going to try to hit on purpose. Most of the area to the left of that is fescue/native vegetation and I’m pretty sure there isn’t a flat lie in any of it. It’s the second hole.
    • Hello all.  I'm about to be 57 yrs old, started playing when I was 16, and have quit and restarted the game more times than I can count.  I had started playing a weekly round with a friend, and finally made the jump to Senior A shafted Tour Edge clubs.  Instantly gained 10 yds with an easier swing (why didn't I make that jump sooner???).  Glad to be a part of the group. Cheers all,
    • I think I like this hole.  It is a clear "Risk-Reward" choice.  Since most of the shots in your cone cleared the bunkers I would say they are a minor risk and not a big issue.  Playing the aggressive line may give you 70ish yards in from what looks to be playable rough while conservative play is 120ish from fairway.  I know you said 70 vs 120 is minor for you but how does the approach angle in impact your results?  I figure both strategies are playing for Birdie since holing out from either is mostly luck. Looking at your proximity hole I think it says @ 50 feet when hitting from the fairway from 100-150 and 40 feet if hitting 50-100 from the rough.  Neither of those is an easy birdie putt.   I like the approach angle from the rough between the bunkers & the adjacent tees over the angle from @ 120 in the fairway but I really do not like the idea of hitting onto the adjacent tee boxes and that may impact my confidence with making the shot.  Also, too far left may be a worse approach angle then from the fairway short of the bunkers. For me this may come down to how confident do I feel when I reach that tee box.  If I am stroking it well off the tee leading up to the hole I would try for over the bunkers and the better angle in but if I am struggling that day I would likely opt for the fairway to take more bad stuff out of play.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...