Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4235 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I want to put a regular flex shaft in my Rocketballz #5 utility, but I'd like it just a bit stiffer, perhaps the equivalent of one hard-step. The shortest shaft available is 38.5" and the current shaft length is a shade over 38", so if I understand it correctly, cutting the shaft down to original length would actually likely soften the shaft, much the same as cutting 5i shaft to fit a 6i when soft-stepping. Could I trim 1/2" from the tip? It will have to be shimmed as the hosel on the TM is .370 and the 950GH is .355. OR a recommendation for another reasonably priced mid-high launch utility shaft? I can get the 950GH for less than $20 here in Japan.

Posted

The 950 GH utility shaft is .370" ....The 950GH (iron) is available in SR flex which is basically an in-between flex between regular and stiff which may suit your needs. 39.5" length is available, part code SRI-A16 PRO.

Alternatively, you could reverse engineer the utility shaft and soft step a stiff flex.


Posted
The 950 GH utility shaft is .370" ....The 950GH (iron) is available in SR flex which is basically an in-between flex between regular and stiff which may suit your needs. 39.5" length is available, part code SRI-A16 PRO. Alternatively, you could reverse engineer the utility shaft and soft step a stiff flex.

My new SpeedBlades were stiffs soft-stepped once and I didn't like the feel/trajectory. I read one article (only one, mind you) which said soft-stepping actually only affected the kick point. But regardless, if I did go this route, do what, buy a longer stiff shaft and cut it down? As for the SR, I haven't seen it on sites so it may not be offered here in Japan. In working on this, I found an alternative shaft, the NS Pro Zelos7 hybrid shaft. It seems to be comparable to the NS Pro950GH HT shafts so far as trajectory


Posted
Further research on the Zelos7 has led me to believe that I may want to use the NS Pro Zelos7 Hybrid in my Rocketballz Rescues because I think it will perform much like the 950GH HT shafts in my SpeedBlades. But my regular flex HT shafts were hard-stepped once and they have more than enough height in their trajectory. How can I increase the stiffness of the Zelos7 about 1/3 step? There's only one shaft length, with a .370" tip, and I found one site that, if Google Translate is right, indicates that these shafts are only to be butt trimmed, (or 'bat' trimmed as Google Translate puts it). So how do you tweak stiffness if there is only one shaft length and you can't tip trim?

  • Moderator
Posted

Further research on the Zelos7 has led me to believe that I may want to use the NS Pro Zelos7 Hybrid in my Rocketballz Rescues because I think it will perform much like the 950GH HT shafts in my SpeedBlades. But my regular flex HT shafts were hard-stepped once and they have more than enough height in their trajectory. How can I increase the stiffness of the Zelos7 about 1/3 step? There's only one shaft length, with a .370" tip, and I found one site that, if Google Translate is right, indicates that these shafts are only to be butt trimmed, (or 'bat' trimmed as Google Translate puts it). So how do you tweak stiffness if there is only one shaft length and you can't tip trim?

Not sure.  Have you tried contacting Nippon and asking them directly?  I'm sure they would be glad to answer your questions.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Contacting Nippin is the next step. Thought I would check on here first in case there was a known, easy solution. Since the great majority of sites that I pull up are in Japanese, I expect that it is going to mean a phone call in Japanese. Basic things I can handle on the phone but the expected conversation on this is going to stretch my language skills.

Note: This thread is 4235 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.