Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

More bounce on irons

4 posts in this topic


Im a 2 hcp player and am currently using the callaway razr forged irons:

My problem is that I tend to hit it quite fat and when trying clubs with more bounce I tend to hit the sweet spot more often.

I have been looking at the ap2 and also even the ap1s. Which other clubs would you suggest for a 2 hcp player that wants more bounce in his irons.

Also, do you think bounce could be part of the problem in my case? The razr forged have really thin soles.

thanks alot,



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

So are you saying you don't like the thin sole on the bottom of the irons because it digs a bit in the turf, magnifying shots that you hit fat? Or do you just hit a lot of shots fat, which makes the previous problem a real kick in the pants? One thing to keep in mind is that, if you're testing the other irons on a mat for a simulator, mats will hide fat shots really well at a golf shop. Just because you hit it better at a shop from their mats doesn't mean it will translate into on-course results unless you test it head to head with your current irons and still find it better.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks for the reply. I dont hit fat shots often but I do hit them more often with these irons than with my previous higher bounce sole bertha irons. Im a bit of a digger with the irons so I think have a sharp sole doesnt benefit me much.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Of all things for optimization 'puring' would make the least difference in consistency. Shafts are not out of round or lacking in straightness as they used to. So, I agree. Puring can be not as beneficial considering how good new shafts are. The ball-bearing puring is a lazy way of doing it. I think using frequency counter is a proper method. And even with that all you are really doing is confirming that the frequency (stiffness) of the shaft is what it says it is.   If the orientation of the heavy side is made facing the target (generally direction clubface expected at impact) it may give you the stiffest orientation. It may not necessarily be the best, i.e., there's no point finding the stiff orientation spine if you are expecting a R-flex. Mind you, all of this is splitting hair in the first place. I am not sure how any of this affects consistency of shaft kick shot after shot anyway. Any shaft is consistent to a flex level in whatever orientation it is set at - heavy side, light side, strong side, weak side, etc. Bottom line.. hit the ball on a launch monitor and if launches and spins best then that is the purest shaft in combo with the head and grip. I will say this that bending fatigue (flex of shaft softens over hundreds of hits..) is a real phenomenon and if you are an avid hack (once a week) then you should consider shaft or even driver replacement every 3-4 years as a rule of thumb IMHO. Of course performance would have to be your best guide.      
    • I'm not sure if this qualifies as "best shot" or "worst shot."    I was about 160 yards from the green on a par 4.  I yanked it hard left and the ball hit a tree about 100 yards away and about 60 yards from the green.   The ball stopped about 6 feet behind the pin and I sunk the putt for birdie.    
    • Note to self.   My index is going to go up even with that low score of 85 since the rating and slope is so much lower. I guess I need to start shooting more lower scores.
    • Having ditched my 3 wood in favor of 5 wood, I decided to experiment a bit and place a four wood back in play. By wood, I mean "real" wood. I have a set of Ben Hogan Speed Slot woods that I fool around with from time to time. I find that when my game is on, the older woods work pretty well. I like the small heads although there is no margin for error. The only concern I have, and not really one that I  am too worried about, is using the older woods with modern/Surylyn or Urethane covered balls.  So far, I have not noticed any nicks or anything, but then again, they have not been hit all that much. I thought about buying a box or two of Balatas, but if you go Titleist, they are a bit pricey.I have not tried the other brands such as Top Flight Z, Dunlop, Maxfli,  Wilson which are a little less expensive.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Jmwest76
      (40 years old)
    2. Mikael Detterberg
      Mikael Detterberg
      (34 years old)
    3. SBrown
      (26 years old)
    4. scottyarcy
      (33 years old)
  • Blog Entries