Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3993 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Seeing as I have never had a fitting and my driver is seemingly producing unreal spin rates, I decided to go to Golf Galaxy and go get fitted for a new driver shaft. I expected to go in, hit some balls with some different shafts, see which one worked best, and leave with just a new shaft, but I ended up spending much more time and facing a harsh reality; something that may not be such a bad thing.

I got there and the fitter, Bobby, greeted me and had me hit a few shots with my 8 iron to warm up. The first shot was a bit off the toe and chunky and carried about 140 yards; 25-30 yards shorter than I usually hit an 8 iron. After a few more swings, I started hitting shots that were going about 165-168 yards. Nothing out of the ordinary, no "power boost" that some people say that GG has in its launch monitors.

Bobby then had me hit 5 drives with my driver. I averaged about 280 yards with a 115 mph swing speed and 3500 rpms of backspin, which even I knew was WAY too high. He instantly told me I shouldn't be hitting a stiff shaft in my driver, and that my swing and ball speeds put me almost to a 2x-stiff shaft. But he also said that my driver head (I have a Callaway RAZR Fit) wasn't doing me any good at all, and no matter what shaft I put in it I'd still have too much spin. To prove it he had me hit the Callaway Big Bertha with an x-stiff shaft in it. I got about 5-10 more yards and my rpms dropped to about 3000, but it was still too high. He then put the same shaft (which he said was the stiffest they had in store) in the Big Bertha Alpha, and I hit a few with it. Not much difference, my rpms were still in the 3000 range. Then he flipped the "gravity core" around and it helped a ton. Rpms were down now to the 2500-2600 range and I was hitting the ball about 315 yards and all with almost the exact same ball flight every time. He said he had an idea and called over the club tech to ask him. Basically what they decided was that I needed a driver with a lower CG and an x-stiff shaft tipped 1/4" to make it a little stiffer and reduce the spin rate more.

This gave me a bit of an interesting question, so I asked Bobby if I need to get my irons reshafted as well since I went up almost 2 flexes in my driver. He gladly gave me an easy way to find out: hit balls and see. He handed me a 6 iron with a stock shaft in it and had me hit a few balls and put some impact tape on the face. They went about 190-200, the usual distance for me, and felt decently solid, but looking at the impact tape they were all at least a little bit on the toe. So Bobby put a TT XP95 S300 shaft in it, and because I'm 6'3,  it was an inch longer than standard, and told me "just watch this." I took a smooth swing and hit one perfectly flush with a tight little draw. 225 yards. Instantly 25-30 more yards than I've been hitting my 6 irons, and it was much easier to control too. I took a few more swings and was getting the same distances with those, and finally I decided I'd really take a swing at one. I hit a high 15-yard draw that carried 235 and rolled out to 245. I couldn't believe my eyes. Even though 230-240 yard 6 irons are never bad, there was something that sucks; I need to get a new driver and iron set or have all my irons reshafted (I was told the latter would be more expensive and that I should go on and get a new iron set as well) . Normally I would think that this is just a way to earn some extra money, but I was never pressured to buy anything from GG, and Bobby recommended that I really decide on what I want to do regarding what to buy, and never shoved anything in my face. I think I'm going to take his word and get both a new driver and iron set with all the specs he recommended. I know I will probably not be hitting 240 yard 6 irons on the course, but I had distance and accuracy gains on the monitor so I think it was a good fitting. I had all my questions answered and then some, and even though I basically had a full set fitting, I was still only charged for the $15 shaft fitting. I was very impressed with everything.

WITB 

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha Alpha, 9*, Fubuki ZT X-Stiff Shaft

3 Wood: Taylormade Rocketballz Stage 2 15*, Aldila NV X-Stiff Shaft

5 Wood: Taylormade Burner Superfast 18*, Aldila NV X-Stiff Shaft

Irons: Callaway Apex Pro, 4-PW, TT XP 95 S300 Shafts

Wedges: Tour Edge TGS 52* and 56*, Taylormade Z-Spin 60*

Putter: Odyssey White Hot XG #9


Posted
Just a note here: It will be cheaper to reshaft your irons than buy new ones. You may prefer the new ones, but from a cost standpoint it is cheaper to reshaft them since you're only paying for the shaft instead of an entire club. Some food for thought: did he have you hit the same iron with two different shafts or did he have you hit your irons versus a new iron with a different shaft. If it's the latter, there is likely also a loft discrepancy contributing to the extra distance. Just a couple things to keep in mind while making your decision.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Interesting.  I think a big key for any monitor work is developing a point of reference with a club you know, as you did with your own 8-iron.

Thanks for the review.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  Pretzel said:

... but from a cost standpoint it is cheaper to reshaft them since you're only paying for the shaft instead of an entire club.

er...no you're not. Clubs don't shaft themselves - somebody has to do it. That means the existing shaft needs to be pulled, the head is then cleaned, prepped and weighed. New shaft tip prepped, dry fit, trim and swing weight adjust, epoxy, ferrule turned down, grip fitted and loft and lie check. That is not free by anyone (certainly not me) and time and components cost money. That means the cost of a reshaft is somewhere approaching $50 per club for a cheapish steel shaft. It's still cheaper than a new set of irons, but if you want to avoid even more costs, buy a secondhand set with the spec you want. Oh - and while you're at it, never assume the readings from a launch monitor in a GG store are anything other than laughable.


Posted
  Nemicu said:

... Oh - and while you're at it, never assume the readings from a launch monitor in a GG store are anything other than laughable.

From my experience at three area Golf Galaxy stores, the distance readings are pretty accurate. At my main store, the head fitter says the distances may be a bit conservative, because they don't want to exaggerate how far a club will go and make customers angry.

If anything, I'm a half club longer on my irons outdoors, than on baseline GG measures indoors.

It all depends on whether the launch monitor has been calibrated recently, whether the distance is inflated, and how skillful the fitter is at reading the results. (In a couple of non-GG shops I've visited, I always worry if I have to tell the fitter how to read the launch monitor results - I'm familiar with the technology, but hardly an expert).

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  Nemicu said:
er...no you're not. Clubs don't shaft themselves - somebody has to do it. That means the existing shaft needs to be pulled, the head is then cleaned, prepped and weighed. New shaft tip prepped, dry fit, trim and swing weight adjust, epoxy, ferrule turned down, grip fitted and loft and lie check. That is not free by anyone (certainly not me) and time and components cost money. That means the cost of a reshaft is somewhere approaching $50 per club for a cheapish steel shaft. It's still cheaper than a new set of irons, but if you want to avoid even more costs, buy a secondhand set with the spec you want. Oh - and while you're at it, never assume the readings from a launch monitor in a GG store are anything other than laughable.

In this, you said exactly what I said. I quote, "It's still cheaper than a new set of irons". I said that it would be cheaper to just reshaft the irons, which you also said, not that it may neccesarily be the best option for him. As for the reshafting cost, it's cheap and easy to do yourself. All you need is a heat gun, a vice (preferably with a little foam ring to put around the shaft), some good epoxy, and a little bit of know-how that is easily obtained using the vast resources of the Internet. This saves you anywhere from $10-25 a club depending on what the other place would charge. You're right that somebody has to do it, so why not let that somebody be you?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  Pretzel said:
Some food for thought: did he have you hit the same iron with two different shafts or did he have you hit your irons versus a new iron with a different shaft. If it's the latter, there is likely also a loft discrepancy contributing to the extra distance. Just a couple things to keep in mind while making your decision.

I actually hit the same 6 iron both times with 2 different shafts. It was a Callaway Apex Pro, which does probably have strong lofts, but so do my Taylormade Burner 2.0s

WITB 

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha Alpha, 9*, Fubuki ZT X-Stiff Shaft

3 Wood: Taylormade Rocketballz Stage 2 15*, Aldila NV X-Stiff Shaft

5 Wood: Taylormade Burner Superfast 18*, Aldila NV X-Stiff Shaft

Irons: Callaway Apex Pro, 4-PW, TT XP 95 S300 Shafts

Wedges: Tour Edge TGS 52* and 56*, Taylormade Z-Spin 60*

Putter: Odyssey White Hot XG #9


Posted
  Nemicu said:
Interesting they had so many left handed demos in store. But then again, the rest of your story is equally far fetched.

I'm just putting this on here as an experience I had. It's your choice whether you believe me or not. But I only hit 3 different demo clubs, I don't know why that's unbelievable, they have a relatively large stock of lefty clubs there.

WITB 

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha Alpha, 9*, Fubuki ZT X-Stiff Shaft

3 Wood: Taylormade Rocketballz Stage 2 15*, Aldila NV X-Stiff Shaft

5 Wood: Taylormade Burner Superfast 18*, Aldila NV X-Stiff Shaft

Irons: Callaway Apex Pro, 4-PW, TT XP 95 S300 Shafts

Wedges: Tour Edge TGS 52* and 56*, Taylormade Z-Spin 60*

Putter: Odyssey White Hot XG #9


Posted
  Pretzel said:
Just a note here: It will be cheaper to reshaft your irons than buy new ones. You may prefer the new ones, but from a cost standpoint it is cheaper to reshaft them since you're only paying for the shaft instead of an entire club.

I don't know why I didn't go on and reply to this too, but what I was told is that since my irons are already at least 2 years old, it would be cheaper to go on and get a new set with the new shafts instead of reshafting my irons because irons are meant to only last 3-4 years. That way I am just getting a new set rather than reshafting and then getting a new set in a year or two.

WITB 

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha Alpha, 9*, Fubuki ZT X-Stiff Shaft

3 Wood: Taylormade Rocketballz Stage 2 15*, Aldila NV X-Stiff Shaft

5 Wood: Taylormade Burner Superfast 18*, Aldila NV X-Stiff Shaft

Irons: Callaway Apex Pro, 4-PW, TT XP 95 S300 Shafts

Wedges: Tour Edge TGS 52* and 56*, Taylormade Z-Spin 60*

Putter: Odyssey White Hot XG #9


Posted
I don't know why I didn't go on and reply to this too, but what I was told is that since my irons are already at least 2 years old, it would be cheaper to go on and get a new set with the new shafts instead of reshafting my irons because irons are meant to only last 3-4 years. That way I am just getting a new set rather than reshafting and then getting a new set in a year or two.

They are meant to last far longer than 3-4 years, I'm not sure where you got that misinformation. I'm using irons that were manufactured in the mid-1980's and still work excellently. It's also MUCH more expensive to buy brand new irons than to reshaft. If you're buying irons used it's not as large a gap, but the reshafting is still the cheapest option available unless someone is practically giving away good clubs. Golf clubs generally aren't like a computer where they're near-useless after five years compared to the current models. If you were using wooden clubs still, then yes you should definitely upgrade, but if they're under 20 years old they're likely fairly similar to the new ones. That said, you could find performance benefits in the new ones as there have been advances in technology, just not ones large enough to require an upgrade to not fall behind. It's kind of like buying a shovel. Once you get to the metal ones with a decent design, they'll last you a long time. There may be other shovels that work slightly better in some regards, but you are in no way forced to use that shovel to keep up unless it provides a large difference for you (like going from a wooden shovel to a metal one). The differences are there and measurable, but they're sometimes not worth the cost (at least for me).

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
When I bought my irons the guy in shop suggested we should all change clubs every 3 years! To keep up with technology, and to make sure they're fitted to evolving swings! Which I guess there could be some truth in this for some people! but as a golf salesman, he would say this! As for clubs only lasting 3/4 years, then they must be selling some poor quality clubs!

Gaz Lee


Posted
  Pretzel said:
They are meant to last far longer than 3-4 years, I'm not sure where you got that misinformation. I'm using irons that were manufactured in the mid-1980's and still work excellently. It's also MUCH more expensive to buy brand new irons than to reshaft. If you're buying irons used it's not as large a gap, but the reshafting is still the cheapest option available unless someone is practically giving away good clubs. Golf clubs generally aren't like a computer where they're near-useless after five years compared to the current models. If you were using wooden clubs still, then yes you should definitely upgrade, but if they're under 20 years old they're likely fairly similar to the new ones. That said, you could find performance benefits in the new ones as there have been advances in technology, just not ones large enough to require an upgrade to not fall behind. It's kind of like buying a shovel. Once you get to the metal ones with a decent design, they'll last you a long time. There may be other shovels that work slightly better in some regards, but you are in no way forced to use that shovel to keep up unless it provides a large difference for you (like going from a wooden shovel to a metal one). The differences are there and measurable, but they're sometimes not worth the cost (at least for me).

I do understand that. Maybe I'm just leaning towards the irons because the irons I'm hitting now are super oversized, strong lofted and the shafts don't fit me. They were bought when I was just starting out and there was no thought of fitting or longevity going into them. The ones I hit in store just looked and felt better, probably because they were made better than mine, as they should be when they are newer and more expensive than mine were. And I also didn't get a chance to hit my irons with the new shafts in them. But honestly the performance was that much better in look, feel, distance, and accuracy that I would be willing to get a new set. On another note, I hadn't actually looked up a way to buy just the shafts until just now, and I cannot find any that are an inch longer like I need them. I haven't heard good things about shaft extender inserts, so I'd rather not go that route unless I need to.

WITB 

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha Alpha, 9*, Fubuki ZT X-Stiff Shaft

3 Wood: Taylormade Rocketballz Stage 2 15*, Aldila NV X-Stiff Shaft

5 Wood: Taylormade Burner Superfast 18*, Aldila NV X-Stiff Shaft

Irons: Callaway Apex Pro, 4-PW, TT XP 95 S300 Shafts

Wedges: Tour Edge TGS 52* and 56*, Taylormade Z-Spin 60*

Putter: Odyssey White Hot XG #9


Posted
I can understand wanting new irons, and I'm not trying to dissuade you. I'm merely giving you the facts to help clear up some misconceptions you had. As to the shaft length issue, I don't have any experience with that. I'm lucky in that I fit regular length clubs perfectly, so I don't have to worry about it. There is something to be said about feeling confident over a shot while looking at the topline of your club. Those Apex Pro's are beautiful. If you like the new clubs more and will enjoy the game that way, buy them provided you hit them well as you say you did! Those were great numbers, especially if the shot dispersion was also tight.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  Pretzel said:
I can understand wanting new irons, and I'm not trying to dissuade you. I'm merely giving you the facts to help clear up some misconceptions you had. As to the shaft length issue, I don't have any experience with that. I'm lucky in that I fit regular length clubs perfectly, so I don't have to worry about it. There is something to be said about feeling confident over a shot while looking at the topline of your club. Those Apex Pro's are beautiful. If you like the new clubs more and will enjoy the game that way, buy them provided you hit them well as you say you did! Those were great numbers, especially if the shot dispersion was also tight.

I appreciate it. I'm here to share opinions and learn more about the game, so anything of the sorts is accepted by me. But yeah, it makes total sense that I don't fit into regular length shafts, considering I'm probably like 4-5 inches taller than the people they are made for. Had I known it was causing me to hit shots off the toe then I would've gone sooner. I love the Apex Pros. Something about smaller clubheads and thinner toplines really suits my eye, and I had never realized how unnecessarily large my irons look until recently. Plus the Apex Pros feel SWEET. Nothing better than flushing one of them.

WITB 

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha Alpha, 9*, Fubuki ZT X-Stiff Shaft

3 Wood: Taylormade Rocketballz Stage 2 15*, Aldila NV X-Stiff Shaft

5 Wood: Taylormade Burner Superfast 18*, Aldila NV X-Stiff Shaft

Irons: Callaway Apex Pro, 4-PW, TT XP 95 S300 Shafts

Wedges: Tour Edge TGS 52* and 56*, Taylormade Z-Spin 60*

Putter: Odyssey White Hot XG #9


Note: This thread is 3993 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for trying to help me out,I'm leaning toward videoing myself,I will have my sister cam me,I gotta tell you that my swing is not a pretty thing..lol.
    • In general, don't see what is so harsh. If you don't like, it's not the law.. just make your own rules. I love vanity cappers Two additional points: 1) Most golfers are not that good: Yes, and most of them think they are better than they are. So a softer penalty would suit their vanity. No, thanks. The 'right' kind would not mind S&D. 2) Houses pinching fairways: If not OB, people would go in and try to hit out of people's yards. Trespassing galore. No, thanks.   
    • I hate articles like these. If you are playing just to have fun, it doesn't matter what rules you are following. Nobody will care if you hit one OB, drop, and then mark down a 5 instead of a 6. If it doesn't impact anyone else or hurt the course, then go wild. For competitive golf, I think stroke and distance or the MLR on OB/lost balls is fine. I don't see any reason to change it. The penalty being too harsh just doesn't register with me.
    • @Christoby - We really can't help you out more at this point. You haven't posted a swing (here or in the member swing subforum), and you haven't provided any concrete data that shows how high you hit it. Generally, you want to be able to hit it pretty high. PGA Tour average is around 100 feet, but also the best players tend to be a bit above that. The conventional wisdom is that it's best to be high with longer clubs and be able to flight it lower with wedges and short irons.  I would guess that you are not hitting it too high. But it's just a guess because you don't have videos or concrete data.  That said, don't do this: It's a band aid that will lead to bad habits.
    • This article makes the claim that stroke and distance is overly harsh. The Worst Rule In Golf | MyGolfSpy There should be a change here. Their claims as to why it is overly harsh.  1) Most golfers are not very good.  Yes, but the rules of golf have been around way before pro golfer existed, and most were not very good.  2) There are too much OB on many modern golf courses.  Maybe were the author lives there are tons of courses with housing developments and tons of OB everywhere, but I don't see it. When I played on courses with a lot of housing, it isn't crazy tight that OB really comes into play that often. So, I think this claim is not valid. 3) PGA Tour players have the benefit of galleries and ball spotters to find lost balls.  Yes, but I do not think it is consistent the further down you go the pro tour hierarchy. Also, this is just a claim to validate more bifurcation of the rules, and it's not really a good one.  4) A lot of golf courses are not properly marked with hazards or maintained.  This is true, but also the rules of golf cover this. A water hazard doesn't need to be marked for it to be a water hazard.   5) It slows down play because you have to go back to the previous spot to re hit the shot.  I get losing a golf ball in tall grass, or sometimes in normal rough sucks. If you hit one close to OB, or into the woods, hit a provisional. It speeds up play for a good portion of times you will have to take stroke and distance.  Then the articles go into a few not really well backed reasons to further bifurcate the rules to make OB less penalizing for amateurs. Basically, they want the modified local rule of placing the ball in the fairway with two stroke penalty to be a one stroke penalty. This means that OB is now less penal than a lateral hazard. Imagine if the water hazard is at the base of a steep-ish slope. If you drop there, you will have a horrible lie/stance. I think right off the bat this stance is not valid. They go into where PGA Tour players get benefits over amateurs. Things like temporary immovable objects allow them to get free relief. Courses normally do not have the stands or other equipment needed to run a tournament. The argument is very weak.  I might be willing to say that OB marked with a white stake and/or white line should be played like a lateral hazard. The scenario in my head is, what if there is a golf hole where there is a lake on the left, and OB on the right that goes down the entire hole. If you hit the ball into the lake, it is not playable. So, to me there is little difference between hitting it left in the water versus right OB. Though, you may be able to play it from the water. A lot of times a lateral hazard is not marked on the water's edge exactly. A lost ball is a lost ball. There is nothing staked, so it is hard to judge where it should be. So, stroke and distance make more sense.  Yea, I think the rules make sense with stroke and distance penalty. I would say not overly harsh.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...