Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Brandt Snedeker Gets New Instructor: Butch Harmon


Note: This thread is 4250 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

How much time do swing coaches like Butch Harmon spend with each player, and often does he have sessions with them? Five seems like quite a handful in terms of having to manage time for each person, in addition to (I think) him teaching other golfers, but I could be totally wrong.

-Rich

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hey Erik...or anyone, do you know anything about sabermetrics in baseball?

The putting thing reminds me about batting average.  As you said it is fickle, or there can be a lot of variation from year to year.  Maybe this is more true for rankings on tour than personal stats, i haven't looked into it too much yet....but batting average goes up and down every year and is partially dependant on batting average with balls in play (BABiP)...which is partially to mostly based on luck.

But when it comes down to it batting average does not tell very much of the story.  The ability to take walks or hit for extra bases is not portrayed in batting average.  To take those into account you have to look at on-base percentage, slugging percentage, or go more complex with weighted on base average or weighted runs created plus.

The whole point is that stats have a way of never answering the whole question and you have to look at the right stats to draw the correct conclusion.  Also, the numbers that people traditionally look at are not always the most important.

In baseball people have looked at batting average, homeruns, RBIs, and stolen bases...or errors on defense...as the most important ways to measure the value of a player....which s far from accurate.

Very long-winded, but I see a huge parallel between baseball sabermetrics and golf statistics you can use to get better...and that is a big reason I was pumped to read lowest score wins.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Hey Erik...or anyone, do you know anything about sabermetrics in baseball?

Yes.

The putting thing reminds me about batting average.  As you said it is fickle, or there can be a lot of variation from year to year.  Maybe this is more true for rankings on tour than personal stats, i haven't looked into it too much yet....but batting average goes up and down every year and is partially dependant on batting average with balls in play (BABiP)...which is partially to mostly based on luck.

Rankings are particularly volatile, oftentimes, unless they're for things like "GIR" where the stats themselves are somewhat consistent year to year. Putting itself is fickle. Combine the two into RANKING of PUTTING and you have a very fickle statistic.

Players can have hot and cold spells with the putter that last a long time, particularly when missing greens can still lead to an improvement of your putting statistics (even strokes gained - because you're chipping, and thus getting a read not only from your ball rolling toward the hole, but also the putts of others in your group who hit the green). And so on. What separates a good putter from a great putter on the PGA Tour is a very slim margin - the ranking is thus fickle.

Let's look at what one stroke over the course of a four-round tournament can do. That's 0.25 strokes gained putting per round. It's enough to…

  • Move you from first to ninth.
  • Move you from tenth to 40th.
  • Move you from 50th to 108th.

The whole point is that stats have a way of never answering the whole question and you have to look at the right stats to draw the correct conclusion.  Also, the numbers that people traditionally look at are not always the most important.

In baseball people have looked at batting average, homeruns, RBIs, and stolen bases...or errors on defense...as the most important ways to measure the value of a player....which s far from accurate.

Very long-winded, but I see a huge parallel between baseball sabermetrics and golf statistics you can use to get better...and that is a big reason I was pumped to read lowest score wins.

FWIW Let's take a look at the winners of PGA Tour events in the 2014 season, along with their rank in Putts Gained.

Frys.com Open (8)

Shriners (9)

CIMB (60)

WGC-HSBC (78)

McGladrey (49)

OHL Classic (98)

ToC (60)

Sony (8)

Humana (76)

Farmers (136)

Waste Management (176)

Pebble (8)

LA Open (74)

WGC Match (UR)

Honda (41)

Puerto Rico (101)

WGC-Cadillac (76)

Valspar (12)

Arnold Palmer (3)

Valero (180)

Shell (25)

Masters (74)

I'll stop there.

The average is between 54th and 55th in the world (and Jimmy Walker's three "8"s help quite a bit).

The Masters, btw, is a prime example. Everyone loves to say you've got to be a great putter to win at Augusta National, but it's not the case. The guys who win there hit the ball well. They hit lots of greens, reach lots of par fives in two, and so on.

Ball striking rules. It too can be fickle, but not nearly as much as putting.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4250 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I got scammed one time on FBM so I don’t trust it.
    • Yeah I’ve tried it but I don’t feel very comfortable doing it like that. Isn’t there like a website where I can do it so it’s safer??  
    • Day 200 3-4 Wider back swing, arms up a bit higher, and added in some flow work to start getting a since of a full swing. Still focusing on arching wrist through downswing. 
    • It's going to be very difficult for the 2026 Masters to match the 2025 edition for storyline. I honestly don't know that anyone else in the field could match the story of Rory finally winning after so many years and the blow ups over the years, not to mention the career slam being completed. No one this year that I can think of is remotely close to that kind of story. Combine that with the attempts at blow ups last year (Double on the 1st, 13, 18 on first try) and the stunningly good shots that he hit in the final round (7, 15, 17, 18 on second try).  Full gamut: https://www.masters.com/en_US/watch/2025-04-13/17445961638226475/every_single_shot_from_rory_mcilroys_final_round.html
    • Let's kick off the 2026 Masters talk with… a look back at 2025 (coming soon):
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.