Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4094 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently bought a set of the Mizuno JPX-825 Pro irons and they are great.  The only thing I don't like is there is no 3-iron.  I think I am going to buy the Mizuno MP-H5 3-iron as a replacement.  The JPX-825 Pro's are all 1 degree stronger than the MP-H5's.  So, I was thinking that I would have the new iron bent one degree strong so that it fits with the rest of my set.

The bounce on the 3-iron is already 0 degrees, so will bending the club for a stronger loft make the bounce go negative?  What worries me is I am already a digger (that's why I think the JPX-825 Pros work so well for me) so will the change in bounce be noticeable?

Would it be better to have the 2-iron bent 2 degrees weak and make the lie and shaft length adjustments to match the 3-iron?  But, maybe that would make the bounce too high?

Any thoughts?  Thanks in advance for the help


Posted

The MP5 irons have Full Hollow Long Iron heads in 1i - 6i. I would contact Mizuno to make sure they can be bent for loft.

You might consider a JPX FLI-HI 3, which has a loft of 19* and a shaft length of 38.75" (same length as H5 3i). The latest  FLI-HI  clubhead, however, has more of a hybrid than an iron look.

If you're set on having a bridge club that has an iron look, consider going outside Mizuno. Mike Stachura has an article on FWs vs. driving irons in the October Golf Digest issue (p. 39). Callaway, Srixon and TaylorMade all have driving irons.

For example, the Apex UI 3i has a loft of 21°, but a shaft length of 39.5"; this is + 0.75" longer than the MP5 3i. So, the extra shaft length might give you extra distance over the 4i.

The TaylorMade UDI #3 has a 20° loft / 2° bounce and a 38.75" shaft, so you might consider it also

Again, you would have to test out the 3i or whatever to make sure the distance gap between the 4i is something you like - provided you can hit the 3i well.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As WUT, said I would consult before I had one of those bent.

An experienced club guy once told me that for a bend to be effective and retain the bend, it needed to be 2 degrees.

Not to be a smart- - -, but do you really think you will notice 1 degree?  I think it takes 4 degrees and a half inch of shaft to make 10 yards, so I am thinking 1 degree would be like 1-2 yards? So when you hit a 3 iron, are all your shots within 3 ft short or 3 ft past the target?  I understand your point of having even gaps, but as WUT said, it might be more useful to think out side the box and look at a different club entirlely to get what you want in yardage and trajectory.

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

So, I was thinking that I would have the new iron bent one degree strong so that it fits with the rest of my set.

The bounce on the 3-iron is already 0 degrees, so will bending the club for a stronger loft make the bounce go negative?

so will the change in bounce be noticeable?

Would it be better to have the 2-iron bent 2 degrees weak and make the lie and shaft length adjustments to match the 3-iron?  But, maybe that would make the bounce too high?

Any thoughts?  Thanks in advance for the help

The effects which it would cause on "Bounce" - NONE

If you would want to hit the 3 iron a bit longer, just move it back in your stance. It will fly lower and have less spin.

It really depends on what you are expecting when you play.

Are you looking for a high shot to carry 200 - 220?

Or a low lower shot for the same distance.

Also, depends if your use is only on a tee shot, or a long approach.

Describe what you are trying to achieve.

Clubs are usually adjusted for angle lie for a persons arm length and height.

Clubs tweaked for face angle are pretty tuff to do and tuff on the clubs.

Most adjustments are to the hosel of the club heads, for lie angle.

When a club is bent at the hosel forward to set the shaft position forward, this is what offset clubs were designed to do.

Having the hands just slightly forward at impact will give you the similar results.

Club Rat

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4094 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 12: stole about 10 minutes in the garage, doing my drill with foam balls. 
    • Day 116 12-6 Still working on getting to lead side. Tonight I also tried some skill work with clubface awareness.  Hit foam balls. 
    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.