Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4044 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Here is what I could find,

Titleist MB: 1025 Carbon Steel

Ping i25: 17-4 Stainless Steel

Mizuno: 1025E Carbon Steel

Callaway Apex Pro: 1020 Carbon Steel

Still, even more game improvement irons will have a harder steel casting, then they will forge in a softer face insert. Though it still might sound a bit more harsh than some muscleback irons, a lot of game improvement irons have good feel.

Looks like most forged irons tend to go with 1020/1025 Carbon Steel.

Caste irons probably use more stainless steel. Again the face might not be the same material as the body of the iron.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Here is what I could find,

Titleist MB: 1025 Carbon Steel

Ping i25: 17-4 Stainless Steel

Mizuno: 1025E Carbon Steel

Callaway Apex Pro: 1020 Carbon Steel

Still, even more game improvement irons will have a harder steel casting, then they will forge in a softer face insert. Though it still might sound a bit more harsh than some muscleback irons, a lot of game improvement irons have good feel.

Looks like most forged irons tend to go with 1020/1025 Carbon Steel.

Caste irons probably use more stainless steel. Again the face might not be the same material as the body of the iron.

Now with Boron! ;-)

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Here is what I could find,

Titleist MB: 1025 Carbon Steel

Ping i25: 17-4 Stainless Steel

Mizuno: 1025E Carbon Steel

Callaway Apex Pro: 1020 Carbon Steel

Still, even more game improvement irons will have a harder steel casting, then they will forge in a softer face insert. Though it still might sound a bit more harsh than some muscleback irons, a lot of game improvement irons have good feel.

Looks like most forged irons tend to go with 1020/1025 Carbon Steel.

Caste irons probably use more stainless steel. Again the face might not be the same material as the body of the iron.

What he said ;-)

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4044 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 12: stole about 10 minutes in the garage, doing my drill with foam balls. 
    • Day 116 12-6 Still working on getting to lead side. Tonight I also tried some skill work with clubface awareness.  Hit foam balls. 
    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.