Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Golf Digest - My Shot: Geoff Ogilvy


Note: This thread is 4040 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted
http://www.golfdigest.com/magazine/2014-12/my-shot-geoff-ogilvy Yep, I know these snobs. There are some on this forum I won't name names - some because I forget their handles. Membership collector guy I'm talking to you. :-) Sorry to go negative nabob but there's lots of more interesting positive thoughts in the piece. [QUOTE]SPEAKING OF GOLF SNOBS, I've identified four sub-species so far. The first is The Membership Collector . He belongs to several clubs, all of them expensive, exclusive and always on the tip of his tongue. The second is The Traditionalist . He raves about 6,000-yard seaside courses (preferably in Scotland), plays them with wooden woods and insists golf was better before they invented the bunker rake. Then there's Mr. Big & New . Buys a new driver every six months, has 40 Scotty Cameron putters, drives brand-new cars to courses that are 7,500 yards. Loves huge clubhouses with wine cellars. Then there's The History Guy . That's me. Always talking about old players, old courses, the history of majors and so on. Knows not only about architects, but when and where they were born. IT'S OBVIOUS that narrow driving zones, extreme length and dense grass don't suit me. I dislike them. So how did I win the 2006 U.S. Open at Winged Foot on one of the most penal setups in golf? Well, nobody hit a lot of fairways. On a course that is supposed to reward pure ball-striking and tremendous driving accuracy, the opposite happened, more or less. I wound up lumped in with everyone else. The penal setups are how Phil Mickelson, far from a precision player, has finished runner-up six times. In 2006, it came down to who was best from 100 yards and in. For that week, it was me.[/QUOTE]

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

That was well worth the click.

Interesting comment about Oosthuizen. He's one guy I like to watch and hope something of his swing seeps into my swing, too bad our ability to imitate lessens as we get older.

To me, everything about Ogilvy says "good guy". Seems like a good dude to have a beer with.

Thanks for posting it.

Steve

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

http://www.golfdigest.com/magazine/2014-12/my-shot-geoff-ogilvy

Yep, I know these snobs. There are some on this forum I won't name names - some because I forget their handles. Membership collector guy I'm talking to you.

Sorry to go negative nabob but there's lots of more interesting positive thoughts in the piece.

I think many people fall into one or two of these categories, and are not really golf snobs. A snob is someone who looks down upon other people for not doing what they are able to do.

For instance, I know one golfer on this site who has owned a new set of irons every month, and multiple putters etc. He just wants to find something suitable for his game.

The traditionalists are definitely not snobs, they certainly do not expect everyone to use old style clubs or play only links style courses. They just want to play the game the way older generations played it.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think many people fall into one or two of these categories, and are not really golf snobs. A snob is someone who looks down upon other people for not doing what they are able to do.

For instance, I know one golfer on this site who has owned a new set of irons every month, and multiple putters etc. He just wants to find something suitable for his game.

The traditionalists are definitely not snobs, they certainly do not expect everyone to use old style clubs or play only links style courses. They just want to play the game the way older generations played it.

The snobs are the ones who look down on people because they do not met their expectations.  Like the person who made the list of golf snobs, who thereby showed themselves to be the true snob.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Quote:

THE SHORT SHOT from a tight lie—the type I played from in front of Winged Foot's 18th in 2006—is causing all kinds of havoc. There are more cases of pitching yips, brought on by that very type of shot, than ever before. There's a very good player on tour, whom I don't care to identify, who has as bad a case of the pitching yips as I've ever seen. He's in a very dark place mentally and has become a master of disguising this weakness. He'll hit his ball to some extraordinarily difficult places to avoid hitting the 30-yard pitch from a tight lie. He's making a very good living, but sooner or later he'll face a 30-yard shot over a bunker on national TV when it really counts. He'll lay the sod over it three times in a row. And then you'll know who it is I'm talking about.

Anyone guess who this is?

Quote:
ALMOST EVERY TOUR PLAYER has a certain amount of "hang on" in their swing. I'm talking about a little bit of restraint in their release through impact, to prevent the ball from curving too much one way or the other. There are only two exceptions: Rory McIlroy and Angel Caberera. Rory holds absolutely nothing back, and his natural draw is a wonder. Angel, when he's on song, hits the most beautiful fade I've ever seen.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4040 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.