Report
-
Topics Being Discussed Right Now on The Sand Trap
-
- 28 replies
- 504 views
-
- 7,135 replies
- 774,564 views
-
- 15 replies
- 8,285 views
-
- 140 replies
- 4,818 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1,297 views
-
-
TST Partners
Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.
Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. -
Popular Now
-
-
Posts
-
-
-
By GolfLug ·
Matt, all of the above requirements to certify the scores and steps of any changes still stand. A DQ is very much in effect for not meeting any of them after the 15 extra minutes to use an honest eraser (EDIT: with the marker's agreement) if necessary. -
By Maroon88 ·
for me it depends on several things: how much fringe there is (if less than 3-4 ft, i usually putt) the length of grass off the green (if tightly mown, putt > chip) how smooth the fringe is (if bumpy--CHIP!) how much run out i need on the green. Either way i read it like a putt once the balls on the green. If chipping I find my landing spot and read the roll out to the hole from there. That said, I love the creativity the short game demands. -
By saevel25 ·
Unless the player just say F-it, and leaves the course, not correcting signing for a lower score, then there will be no DQ's. This rule, if the PGA Tour players correct the score with in 15 minutes, negates the DQ. Maybe going back to how the committee is allowed to modify the process for processing the scores. In the USGA rulebook, the rules say that once the scorecard is returned to the committee, the player must not change the scorecard. So, does their new procedure violate this? So, is the PGA Tour rules stating the card is not considered "returned" to the committee until after it is validated, and no 15-minute window is granted?
-
