Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3980 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone, have a question about these clubs I just purchased. I bought a set of rbz graphite regular shafts 6-AW. Went on ebay and purchased a 4 and a 5 iron to match up the set. Took them out a couple of times on the course and couldn't hit them very well. I know it's not the clubs and that it's something in my swing that I am doing wrong. Because I can go to the range and hit the heck out of them all day long. They feel pretty good. I think it might even be a mental thing that I'm doing wron. Had to go to graphite because of my arthritis. Yes, I am a Senior Citizen. :)

I have a chance to pick up a set of Rocketbladez 6-P for a couple of hundred bucks. Hit them at ******** and they seem really solid. And from what I have read they got pretty good reviews. I asked the Taylormade rep at the store about the difference's in the two and he told me basically that the rocketbladez have more forgiveness at the bottom. I think they are nicer looking club than the rbz's so that's a plus. But I would be giving up 3 clubs. I would have to purchase a 4 and a 5 iron and I wouldn't have the AW wedge.

I have a way better deal with what I have now, but it the other clubs are going to work out better for me, I would definately go back to the store and trade them in. I have a 90 day return policy on the rbz's in which I paid $140.00  for. The rocketbladez are $200.00. So I would have to come up with a difference with about $80.00. Are these Rocketbladez that much better than the rbz's. I can't tell, and would probably have to take them out on the course to see if they work any better for me. I know these clubs are not the newest on the block, but I really just wanted to get a decent set of Taylormade's

Anyone have any experience with these two clubs?

thanks,

martinbr


Posted

To answer your question about wither the R-bladez are better than the RBZ irons, I don't know for sure.  What I can tell you from personal experience is that I hit the R-bladez irons much better than the RBZ irons my league playing partner carries.  We've swapped irons on par-3s a few times.  He hits his RBZ irons better than he hit my R-Bladez.  I hit mine better than I hit his RBZ irons.  He hits the RBZ irons overall better than I hit my R-Bladez.

So much for comparison.  I have the same 6-AW Rocketbladez set with graphite shafts.  To me, they hit really soft, go high and straight.  I don't hit them that long, but I'll take the forgiveness and straight ball flight over distance, I guess.

Added #4 and 5 hybrids to fill out the set.  Don't carry an iron longer than a #6 because the hybrids are so much easier to hit.

dave

The ultimate "old man" setup:

Ping G30 driver
Ping G Fairway woods - 5 and 7 woods
Callaway X-Hot #5 hybrid; Old school secret weapon
Ping G #6-9 irons; W and U wedges
Vokey 54 and 58* Wedges
Odyssey Versa Putter
Golf Balls

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Anyone have any experience with these two clubs?

thanks,

martinbr

Welcome to the site.

The biggest difference IMO is the "cleaner" look of the RocketBladez at address. Performance wise they are very similar.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Hi everyone, have a question about these clubs I just purchased. I bought a set of rbz graphite regular shafts 6-AW. Went on ebay and purchased a 4 and a 5 iron to match up the set. Took them out a couple of times on the course and couldn't hit them very well. I know it's not the clubs and that it's something in my swing that I am doing wrong. Because I can go to the range and hit the heck out of them all day long. They feel pretty good. I think it might even be a mental thing that I'm doing wron. Had to go to graphite because of my arthritis. Yes, I am a Senior Citizen. :)

I have a chance to pick up a set of Rocketbladez 6-P for a couple of hundred bucks. Hit them at ******** and they seem really solid. And from what I have read they got pretty good reviews. I asked the Taylormade rep at the store about the difference's in the two and he told me basically that the rocketbladez have more forgiveness at the bottom. I think they are nicer looking club than the rbz's so that's a plus. But I would be giving up 3 clubs. I would have to purchase a 4 and a 5 iron and I wouldn't have the AW wedge.

I have a way better deal with what I have now, but it the other clubs are going to work out better for me, I would definately go back to the store and trade them in. I have a 90 day return policy on the rbz's in which I paid $140.00  for. The rocketbladez are $200.00. So I would have to come up with a difference with about $80.00. Are these Rocketbladez that much better than the rbz's. I can't tell, and would probably have to take them out on the course to see if they work any better for me. I know these clubs are not the newest on the block, but I really just wanted to get a decent set of Taylormade's

Anyone have any experience with these two clubs?

thanks.

To answer your question about wither the R-bladez are better than the RBZ irons, I don't know for sure.  What I can tell you from personal experience is that I hit the R-bladez irons much better than the RBZ irons my league playing partner carries.  We've swapped irons on par-3s a few times.  He hits his RBZ irons better than he hit my R-Bladez.  I hit mine better than I hit his RBZ irons.  He hits the RBZ irons overall better than I hit my R-Bladez.

So much for comparison.  I have the same 6-AW Rocketbladez set with graphite shafts.  To me, they hit really soft, go high and straight.  I don't hit them that long, but I'll take the forgiveness and straight ball flight over distance, I guess.

Added #4 and 5 hybrids to fill out the set.  Don't carry an iron longer than a #6 because the hybrids are so much easier to hit.

dave


Well they definitely longer than my other clubs. But I just want to get something I can get off the grass and onto the green. Screw the distance, even if I have to take a longer club. I am going to keep them for awhile and if they don't work out, I will use them as a trade in or sell them and get something else. I have a set of clone r11's that feel really good. Actually, I don't even know why I bought these things. Just looked like a pretty good deal.


Posted

Welcome to the site.

The biggest difference IMO is the "cleaner" look of the RocketBladez at address. Performance wise they are very similar.


mvmac, have you tried the rbz's before? How did you like them?

martinbr


  • Moderator
Posted

mvmac, have you tried the rbz's before? How did you like them?

martinbr

Just on the range. Thought they were good, performed the way they were suppose to. Launch the ball high, forgiving off miss-hits.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Never hit the RBZ's. My Son has the RocketBladez, with stiff shafts. I have hit the PW, 8i, 7i, and 5i. All preformed very well, very easy to hit, and were a bit longer than my Titleist CB 695's which are forged, so the RB, felt a bit different, still a good club imho.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Just on the range. Thought they were good, performed the way they were suppose to. Launch the ball high, forgiving off miss-hits.


thanks!


Posted

Never hit the RBZ's. My Son has the RocketBladez, with stiff shafts. I have hit the PW, 8i, 7i, and 5i. All preformed very well, very easy to hit, and were a bit longer than my Titleist CB 695's which are forged, so the RB, felt a bit different, still a good club imho.


Yeah, I think I'm going to keep these for awhile. When I become a better player I will probably dump them and get something else.

martinbr


Note: This thread is 3980 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.