Jump to content
IGNORED

Short Slant vs. L Neck Putter


Note: This thread is 3306 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

I'm looking for some information on some putters.  I bought the Taylormade Spider Blade Slant putter recently.  Really like it.  It is the short slant model.  I purchased this one because it has the same offset as my previous putter.  However, the lie is different at 70 deg, vs. my old one which was more like 74.  I don't mind that, but it does move the ball further away in my address.  Which brings up my question.

The other model has an L-Neck, so the hosel joins the shaft further.  I am wondering if this would change the distance between my feet and the club head.  Both putters are 38 inches, with a 70 deg lie.  If this hosel shape would bring the clubhead in half an inch I might like that better as it gives me a better view over the ball.  I'm just not sure if they accomodate for the hosel design in some way and the alignment would be the same or not.

does this make sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

The other model has an L-Neck, so the hosel joins the shaft further.  I am wondering if this would change the distance between my feet and the club head.  Both putters are 38 inches, with a 70 deg lie.  If this hosel shape would bring the clubhead in half an inch I might like that better as it gives me a better view over the ball.  I'm just not sure if they accomodate for the hosel design in some way and the alignment would be the same or not.

The hosel style won't change the measurements of the putter. Not saying it won't make a difference in your perception but it's not actually changing the lie angle or where the club head is.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3306 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • You get that percentage aiming 9 yards right of the bunker, basically 1 yard away from the center of the fairway, so if he aim more left or rigth than that, yes his FIR is going to be lower.  
    • Uhhhhh… I’d bet against him hitting it 43% of the time, especially as he would be aiming away from the bunker left.
    • As I said before, "The scoring averages are going to be a little higher but is not going to make a difference on club selection."  Also remember that normally FIR is 60%, the other 40% is not always rough (hazard, bunker, trees) so in reality that 1/5 is more like 1/15 or 0.066 a hole or 15 yards.   I re-run the numbers but with the exact yards and using rough and the numbers just went up a little bit but the decision making remains the same, Driver is the best choice.  With driver (50 yards from green), from left to righ I considered left of cart path "trees/recovery" because you told us that trees left were tall so I guess if you pull it you are not going to carry them. Rigth of the car path you have 9 yards of rough, 20 yards of greenside bunker, 4 yards of rough, then the 20 yards of fairway, 3 yards of bunker (I considered 20 yards of roll so you are not going to carry the 2nd pot bunker), 18 yards of rough and finally trees/recovery. You are going to hit this fairway 43% of the times. Rough represent only 27% of your shots.  Scoring average increased from 3.78 to 3.83. At this distance theres only 0.15 difference between rough and fairway, that's why I tell you is almost negligible for strategy purposes unless rough is really penal. Here are the rest of the possibilities, also with the exact numbers and rough. Wood:     3iron: 4iron:  Average score for a PGA pro from 355 is 3.91. For an easy hole like this I guess it could be a little lower. 
    • Is there anything specific in the 81 minutes? 🙂 
    • Wordle 1,111 3/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜⬜⬜🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...