Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6560 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I've tried just about everything out there at one time or another and I keep coming back to Taylormade, not just for the driver but the irons also. I'm a weekend duffer and would love to get out more and if I did maybe I would be using more precision instruments. But for the average golfer I don't think you can go wrong with Taylormade. They are long, very forgiving and look and feel good. I don't think you can ask for anything more in clubs. I currently have the following and am very happy with them:
Taylormade r7 460
Taylormade r7 irons
Bobby Jones rescue 19% and 3 wood but I think the Taylormade 3 wood is probably as good.

Posted
The TM fairway woods are some of the most forgiving I've ever been around. The V Steel line was the most used FWY wood ever on the Pro Tour and you can get those REALLY cheap now...I carry the 18* 5 wood and may never take it out of the bag. They are not the longest woods I've ever hit, but they are probably the straightest.

Driver: Tour Edge Exotics 9* with Stiff Grafalloy Blue Shaft
3 Wood: Titleist 906F2 15* with Stiff Grafalloy Blue Prototype Comp NT Shaft
5 wood: Taylor Made V Steel 18* with Stiff Grafalloy Blue Prototype Comp NT Shaft
Hybrid: Nickent Hybrid 3 iron with DG S300 Steel Shaft
Irons: Mizuno MP-33 4-PW...


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
I absolutely believe in the moveable weight technology. My tendency has been a high fade off the tee. Moving the weights around has definitely helped me keep the ball straighter and lower.

I will say that I had an r7 460 for much of the past year and the two moveable weights just didn't do much for me. I bought that one after giving my original r7 quad to my son. Later in the season I bought a superquad and my drives immediately got better.

I haven't really compared any drivers side by side. As far as distance goes, I have no doubt that the inconsistencies in my swing speed account for most changes in the distance I achieve, but I will also say that club set up is really important. For me, when I hit the ball too high, it drops like a stone and doesn't roll. I'm getting a lot more roll with the superquad.

Differences in shafts and lofts count for a lot.

In my TM r7 Stand bag:
Driver- r11 10.5° Reg shaft

Fairway wood - r11 3 wood
Hybrids- r11 3, 4 & 5
Irons- M1 6-AW, xft 50, xft 54.12 , xft 60.08°
Still have / love my r7 CGB Max 6-PW, xft 50, xft 54.12, xft 60.08° which I keep in Myrtle Beach, Tommy Armour 855 Putter


Posted
Lots of ink gets spilled around here about what clubs are the best... I don't think there is as big a gap in performance between manufacturers as club pushers would like us to believe. TaylorMade has done an outstanding job marketing to the younger crowd and they make great equipment, hence, their liberal use on Tour.

For the average player/consumer, club/manufacturer choice comes down to performance and knowing some of the intangibles: style, general performance, and preference.

I think the biggest gap lies between players- and game-improvement clubs.

Jeff

10.5° Callaway FT-iZ Tour

18°, 20°, 23° Adams Idea Pro Prototype Hybrid

4-9 Titleist 690.CB
48° Titleist Vokey Tour Nickel
54°, 58° Titleist Vokey Tour Oil Can

Scotty Cameron NP2, 33"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6560 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,638 3/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • It may not have been block practice, though, is one of the main points here. You may have been serving and from the same place, but you were likely trying to do slightly different things. It seems that would only be blocked practice if you were trying to hit the same exact ball hit to you to the same exact place in the far court. I'm not sure that's as random as if the ball that you're given to hit is at different places, too, but again…
    • I played tennis in college. I thought block practice was great for serves because you were starting the point and  you could easily adjust where you wanted to place the ball based off the same motion. I equate those to tee balls. I despised block practice for groundstrokes once you reached a certain level and your fundamentals were good. To me, hitting a 100 crosscourt backhands in a row was silly because I would never do that in a match. I needed to randomize it by hitting some deep, some angled, all with different speeds and spins. I share that same thought about iron play. Because we seldom hit the same approach shots hole after hole, I prefer to practice irons randomly. 
    • Wordle 1,638 2/6* 🟨⬛🟨🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,638 3/6* ⬛🟦⬛⬛⬛ 🟦⬛⬛🟦🟦 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.