Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3427 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Everywhere I go, I read that when you add length to clubs, you should adjust the lie as well. Even a clubfitter told me this.
It seems false to me if the goal of using longer clubs is to get into a more comfortable spine angle position (which typically is the goal, right?):

extensions_lie_angle.png

 

Try this to see what I'm on about:
- Grab a wedge "choked down" all the way down the grip so your index finger touches the bare shaft. As if you have a very short club.
- Now set up with the clubhead flat on the ground. You'll have to bend over a lot, as if you are a tall player with short clubs. Hold this position.
- Slide your hands back to the normal position on the grip without changing anything else, as if you extend your club. Now your hands are too close to your body.
- Push your hands away from you. Now the toe points up, and you are too far from the ball.
- Now raise your chest. This raises your hands, so the clubhead will be level with the ground again, it also slides closer to you.

It seems to me that if the lie was correct to begin with, it should still be correct after extending the club, because you extended the club in order to raise your chest which in turn raised your hands. Am I wrong?

Making the lie more upright instead of (or in combination with) adding length would actually strain my left wrist if the grip is properly held (in the fingers), because the wrist needs to bend down to get the shaft in the more vertical position required to get the clubhead level to the ground.

Edited by Roenie

Posted

If you add length you may also have to adjust swing weight

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Roenie said:

Everywhere I go, I read that when you add length to clubs, you should adjust the lie as well. Even a clubfitter told me this.
It seems false to me if the goal of using longer clubs is to get into a more comfortable spine angle position (which typically is the goal, right?):

extensions_lie_angle.png

 

Try this to see what I'm on about:
- Grab a wedge "choked down" all the way down the grip so your index finger touches the bare shaft. As if you have a very short club.
- Now set up with the clubhead flat on the ground. You'll have to bend over a lot, as if you are a tall player with short clubs. Hold this position.
- Slide your hands back to the normal position on the grip without changing anything else, as if you extend your club. Now your hands are too close to your body.
- Push your hands away from you. Now the toe points up, and you are too far from the ball.
- Now raise your chest. This raises your hands, so the clubhead will be level with the ground again, it also slides closer to you.

It seems to me that if the lie was correct to begin with, it should still be correct after extending the club, because you extended the club in order to raise your chest which in turn raised your hands. Am I wrong?

Making the lie more upright instead of (or in combination with) adding length would actually strain my left wrist if the grip is properly held (in the fingers), because the wrist needs to bend down to get the shaft in the more vertical position required to get the clubhead level to the ground.

Another reason to tweak the lie with a longer shaft is the 'droop' effect. The longer the shaft the more the shaft will bend down toward the ground through impact (essentially making it more 'toe down') so to get the club sole moving through the ground as level with a longer shaft you may need to make the lie a bit more upright to lift the slightly 'drooping' toe.

Kevin


Posted

Shaft length and lie angle are highly related, and adjusting one often requires adjusting the other. Also, the purpose of adjusting lie angle is to get clubface square at impact; if comfortable spine angle also results, so be it... but that's not the reason for adjusting lie.

16 hours ago, Roenie said:

It seems to me that if the lie was correct to begin with, it should still be correct after extending the club, because you extended the club in order to raise your chest which in turn raised your hands. Am I wrong?

Callaway clubfitting guidelines say that:

  1. Lie angle should be fit dynamically, determining lie angle at impact - not how the clubface sets at address. (...if lie was correct to begin with.. has no bearing. Is lie angle correct at impact?)
  2. Lie angle should be used to fine-tune the club after shafts are cut to proper length.
15 hours ago, natureboy said:

The longer the shaft the more the shaft will bend down toward the ground through impact (essentially making it more 'toe down')

Now, if shaft is lengthened 1/2", the club's lie will become 1 degree more upright. But as nb says, this will increase the toe down (lie angle flattens more at impact), so you would need a dynamic fitting to see how much the lie angle needed to be changed.

16 hours ago, newtogolf said:

If you add length you may also have to adjust swing weight

Very definitely. Increasing a club's length 1/2" increases swingweight +3 points; the opposite for trimming shaft length. You can lessen swingweight on lengthened club by putting on slightly heavier grip; a good clubfitter can calculate this for you.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3427 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The term I hear most often is "double teeing" which means the course/club has starting times from both the #1 and #10 tee.  I have encountered this many times and we know if we are the first group off #10, we may well get to #1 and have to wait because there are groups still with tee times yet to tee of #1.  In most instances, where the course/club has a starter, he normally explains this situation.  In this case, the pro advised what you would could/would encounter making the turn to #1.  And, that is exactly what happened.  Probably would have been wise to talk to the pro after playing back 9 and ask when you could go off #1 since apparently that club does not double tee.   Regardless, the outburst towards the other group was uncalled for.  And, I don't blame the member for being upset.  As a member of a private club, you are responsible for the actions of your guest.  I have played many times as a guest in the UK and I am pretty damn sure my host was responsible for my actions while at the club.  I know at the clubs I have belonged to here in the US, that is the way it is.  As a matter of fact, the member may find himself being brought before management and facing possible suspension.  So, I don't blame him for being upset.  However, as the host, he really should have stepped up and put a stop to the OP's actions.  OP makes this statement "I now understand that standards are different on the "private course." But I'll take those lessons to the muni, too."  No, the standards are not different.  You, sir, seem to be just a bit hard headed and belligerent, even if you are college professor...which possibly explains a lot.   JMHO
    • Day 32: worked for about 10 minutes on my drill. Filmed it as well for a check in. I think it’s slightly better but still seeing some issues. 
    • Day 44 (26 Dec 25)  -  played in the Friday men’s shootout with a twist - used the Toney Penna persimmons and MacGregor blades - had a blast playing these clubs.  They really help in zoning in on making solid ball contact.  Scoring was solid - had several looks at birdie and had a few par saves.  Overall a day of focused course management. 
    • Day 2: 2025.12.27 Eighteen holes at Kauri Cliffs. Focusing on trying to keep flex in right leg during backswing.
    • Day 136 12-26 Had a different practice planned today but life happened. Worked on "wide to wide" and still working on remaining flowy. Starting the club head in front of the ball as a drill, is helping with the flow of the swing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.