Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3406 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Everywhere I go, I read that when you add length to clubs, you should adjust the lie as well. Even a clubfitter told me this.
It seems false to me if the goal of using longer clubs is to get into a more comfortable spine angle position (which typically is the goal, right?):

extensions_lie_angle.png

 

Try this to see what I'm on about:
- Grab a wedge "choked down" all the way down the grip so your index finger touches the bare shaft. As if you have a very short club.
- Now set up with the clubhead flat on the ground. You'll have to bend over a lot, as if you are a tall player with short clubs. Hold this position.
- Slide your hands back to the normal position on the grip without changing anything else, as if you extend your club. Now your hands are too close to your body.
- Push your hands away from you. Now the toe points up, and you are too far from the ball.
- Now raise your chest. This raises your hands, so the clubhead will be level with the ground again, it also slides closer to you.

It seems to me that if the lie was correct to begin with, it should still be correct after extending the club, because you extended the club in order to raise your chest which in turn raised your hands. Am I wrong?

Making the lie more upright instead of (or in combination with) adding length would actually strain my left wrist if the grip is properly held (in the fingers), because the wrist needs to bend down to get the shaft in the more vertical position required to get the clubhead level to the ground.

Edited by Roenie

Posted

If you add length you may also have to adjust swing weight

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Roenie said:

Everywhere I go, I read that when you add length to clubs, you should adjust the lie as well. Even a clubfitter told me this.
It seems false to me if the goal of using longer clubs is to get into a more comfortable spine angle position (which typically is the goal, right?):

extensions_lie_angle.png

 

Try this to see what I'm on about:
- Grab a wedge "choked down" all the way down the grip so your index finger touches the bare shaft. As if you have a very short club.
- Now set up with the clubhead flat on the ground. You'll have to bend over a lot, as if you are a tall player with short clubs. Hold this position.
- Slide your hands back to the normal position on the grip without changing anything else, as if you extend your club. Now your hands are too close to your body.
- Push your hands away from you. Now the toe points up, and you are too far from the ball.
- Now raise your chest. This raises your hands, so the clubhead will be level with the ground again, it also slides closer to you.

It seems to me that if the lie was correct to begin with, it should still be correct after extending the club, because you extended the club in order to raise your chest which in turn raised your hands. Am I wrong?

Making the lie more upright instead of (or in combination with) adding length would actually strain my left wrist if the grip is properly held (in the fingers), because the wrist needs to bend down to get the shaft in the more vertical position required to get the clubhead level to the ground.

Another reason to tweak the lie with a longer shaft is the 'droop' effect. The longer the shaft the more the shaft will bend down toward the ground through impact (essentially making it more 'toe down') so to get the club sole moving through the ground as level with a longer shaft you may need to make the lie a bit more upright to lift the slightly 'drooping' toe.

Kevin


Posted

Shaft length and lie angle are highly related, and adjusting one often requires adjusting the other. Also, the purpose of adjusting lie angle is to get clubface square at impact; if comfortable spine angle also results, so be it... but that's not the reason for adjusting lie.

16 hours ago, Roenie said:

It seems to me that if the lie was correct to begin with, it should still be correct after extending the club, because you extended the club in order to raise your chest which in turn raised your hands. Am I wrong?

Callaway clubfitting guidelines say that:

  1. Lie angle should be fit dynamically, determining lie angle at impact - not how the clubface sets at address. (...if lie was correct to begin with.. has no bearing. Is lie angle correct at impact?)
  2. Lie angle should be used to fine-tune the club after shafts are cut to proper length.
15 hours ago, natureboy said:

The longer the shaft the more the shaft will bend down toward the ground through impact (essentially making it more 'toe down')

Now, if shaft is lengthened 1/2", the club's lie will become 1 degree more upright. But as nb says, this will increase the toe down (lie angle flattens more at impact), so you would need a dynamic fitting to see how much the lie angle needed to be changed.

16 hours ago, newtogolf said:

If you add length you may also have to adjust swing weight

Very definitely. Increasing a club's length 1/2" increases swingweight +3 points; the opposite for trimming shaft length. You can lessen swingweight on lengthened club by putting on slightly heavier grip; a good clubfitter can calculate this for you.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3406 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦⬛🟧 ⬛🟧🟧⬛🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 Awesome, @WillieT! Go get another!
    • Wordle 1,631 2/6* ⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.