Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3187 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

Which of the two is the better super-game improvement iron Cobra Max or Cobra Fly-Z XL?  Which will yield better results for beginners?


Posted
2 minutes ago, pshep68 said:

Hi,

Which of the two is the better super-game improvement iron Cobra Max or Cobra Fly-Z XL?  Which will yield better results for beginners?

This is going to sound like a cop-out, but it will depend on the golfer.  You should get a fitting, or at least try hitting each.

If you can't (or don't want to) do that, just flip a coin.  ;-)

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
32 minutes ago, pshep68 said:

Hi,

Which of the two is the better super-game improvement iron Cobra Max or Cobra Fly-Z XL?  Which will yield better results for beginners?

I think Cobra Max has a slight hosel offset which is usually a good thing for beginners.

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Cobra Max irons have distinct offset, which can help beginners with hand position. Set designed with low center of gravity to help with high launch. Middle irons are hollow, and short irons and wedges are cavity-back. Also had mix with low-end hybrids instead of irons.

Cobra FlyZ XL irons: reviews said they had a draw bias, and hit the ball high and fairly straight. Two mix variations: 4i-GW, and 4H-6H, 7i-GW.

They appear to be similar; not sure which one hit the market first.

 

 

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
23 hours ago, Hardspoon said:

This is going to sound like a cop-out, but it will depend on the golfer.  You should get a fitting, or at least try hitting each.

If you can't (or don't want to) do that, just flip a coin.  ;-)

Hi,

Thank you for the reply.  It is greatly appreciated.  A fitting or hitting is not an option.


Note: This thread is 3187 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.