Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2696 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey everyone,

Long time lurker, first time poster. Recently fell in love with golf and decided I need to get a set rather than use a hodge podge bag of clubs. I'm trying to decide between the Cobra Max irons and Callaway XRs. 

1) Cobra Max
a) I had a demo 7 iron of this set, and it was the first club I ever hit really well. I was hitting it consistently 150 yards straight. At the same time I didnt necessarily love the feel. 
b)Also had a cobra 5 iron amp cell demo that I hit well
c) $100 cheaper than the XRs
d) Rated as "Super Game Improvement"

e) Have a draw bias. I tend to hook my shots (rarely ever slice) so I'm not sure this is ideal for me.

2) Callaway XRs
a) Get's great reviews
b) Rated as only "Game Improvement" but I've read tons of reviews saying they are great for all players and give more distance
c) I feel like I could "grow into" these clubs
d) $100 more expensive

e) Never hit them, cant find them at a demo place near me so would be buying blind/

d) Look almost unused. In better shape than the Cobra Max Irons.

So how much difference is there between super game improvement and just game improvement irons? Which would serve me best? I've been playing for like 3 months, best round ever was 96. 

Thanks for any replies!


Posted
5 hours ago, Eagles228 said:

 


So how much difference is there between super game improvement and just game improvement irons? Which would serve me best? I've been playing for like 3 months, best round ever was 96. 

 

"super"

It is all marketing fluff, IMHO.  Find the tools that fit you best and go for it.  I am in the same boat as you.  this is my first year.  I went and hit a bunch of clubs and ended up with Ping G30 irons.  Almost half the price of the latest and greatest, but they work well for me.

Always remember, the same country that invented golf and called it a game, invented bag pipes and called it music.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Tough to make a good decision without hitting.  That said, if you shot 96 after 3 months that is a good score.  I've hit the XR's and they hit nicely.  More than 10 years ago I bought some Wilson Ci7s without hitting them and they worked well, so you don't always need to demo.

In the 70's (40+ years ago) there wasn't a demo program like today.  If you were able to try one out great, if not you bought the clubs and worked through it.

I bought the XR OS because I'm old and with torn rotator cuff tendons I need the height with half a swing.

You also have to consider what you can sell the clubs for if they don't work out.  I'm thinking the Callaways will sell easier.

John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2696 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.